DG's Takeaways from South Carolina

#1

DiderotsGhost

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
4,666
Likes
23,783
#1
Another painful loss for the good guys. We've improved significantly since last season, but still frustrating to lose games like this. Here are my thoughts.


Offense

Tyson Helton. Helton has been a favorite scapegoat for fans this season, but this game more than any other showcases that he's a very good OC. Helton outschemed Muschamp's D consistently thorughout this game. This is the best offensive gameplan I can remember seeing for a UT team in a long while. Combine that with what we saw against Auburn and I'm pretty happy with Helton. To the extent that we've struggled on offense this season, it's had little to do with Helton.

JG. This week, we heard the familiar criticism that JG is poor at reading defenses, but JG didn't really play to script. He did a great job reading the D, recognizing the blitz, and taking advantage of weaknesses. Yet, he had quite a few balls sail on him, which is atypical for JG. He struggled on the last drive with timing, as well. Overall, not a bad game for JG, but also not a great game. I'd give him a "B-" for this one, but still encouraged by his overall improvement in reading defenses.

Jordan + Chandler. Both Jordan and Chandler played great games. Jordan in particular managed to find ways to get yards on plays where he wasn't really give much. I think both of these guys are among the most underrated SEC RBs right now. They are finding ways to get yards with little help from the O-line.

Fils-Aime. I've generally felt that Pruitt's decisions on players have made sense, but I've gotta question why we weren't using CFA at RB before now. In any case, he had a great game and Tyson Helton took full advantage of his skill set. Bravo to CFA and Helton.

Pass blocking. The O-line has continued to improve on pass blocking, but still overall far short of where they need to be. Nevertheless, it's encouraging that they are getting better.

O-line penalties. On the other hand, the O-line penalties were maddening! How many false starts did we have? Look, I get that Butch left a mess at OL; not enough depth; not enough strength; but this coaching staff needs to get a handle on the penalties. This was a 3-point game and we could've easily won it without the penalties.

Scheming away from O-line weaknesses. Already said Helton did an excellent job, but he really pulled out every trick in the book to scheme around the O-line's weaknesses in run blocking.

Overall offense. Lots of room for improvement on offense, but overall, I thought offense was pretty good this game. It was a solid "B+"


Defense

Ugh. On the other hand, the defense was just awful the entire 2nd Half plus that last SC drive in the 1st Half. At some point, Bryan McClendon figured out a weak point in the defense and hammered it relentlessly. South Carolina ran for 224 yards on us, averaging 5.6 yards per carry, and I'd wager to guess those stats are much worse if you look at them only after we took a 14-3 lead. From that point on, South Carolina just obliterated our defense nearly every drive.

Bituli. In spite of our defensive ineptitude, we did have some guys with big games. Bituli was responsible for the pass deflection that resulted in a Shy Tuttle interception. Bituli also should've been credited with a fumble recovery on the one play that the refs screwed up.


Other Things

Bad calls by refs are a consistent theme. I don't think I've ever seen a season where we've been on the wrong end of so many awful calls. We should've had a fumble recovery; instead South Carolina scores a TD because the refs somehow didn't notice that the ball carrier lost the ball almost as soon as he touched it. The defensive pass interference call that lead to a field goal for South Carolina was also terrible. I haven't complained too much about the bad calls, because it really didn't make a difference in games we were getting blown out, but it may have very well handed this game to South Carolina. (And Auburn had a chance late because of a terrible touchdown call that was actually an INT).

Recruiting. It's obvious to anyone we need help at O-line, but I think we need help on D-line even more. Our run D has been awful and we're losing several Seniors (Tuttle, Bain, Johnson, Phillips). We're improving on pass D as the season goes along, but Pruitt's biggest challenge right now is going to be to figure out how to make this run D competitive. If we can't stop teams from running *WHEN WE KNOW THEY ARE GOING TO RUN*, we're not going to win many games.

Bowl game. As annoyed as I was at SEC Network for constantly showing the bowl game graphic, this loss hurts our chances substantially. We now need to beat Charlotte next week and then win 2 out of 3 against Kentucky, Mizzou, and Vandy. It's do-able, but it will not be easy.

Overall takeaways. This is a tricky game to analyze. We saw significant improvement in some areas, but our run D was horrendous! .South Carolina has not even been that good at running the ball. If SC can run that well on us, Kentucky and Mizzou could absolutely eat us alive! Also the O-line penalties continue to hurt us badly. While not as obvious as the porous run D, it's entirely conceivably that the O-line penalties cost us anywhere from 3 - 14 points.

The Big Picture. In spite of our frustrations in this game, important to keep the big picture in mind. 1st year coaches are almost never successful. Even the all-time greats have struggled in the 1st season (Saban, Carroll, Stoops, etc, etc, etc). As much as I want to see improvement week to week and during this last month of the season, ultimately, we'll get a better sense of what kinda coach Pruitt is during the offseason (recruiting) and during Years 2 and 3. Year #1 very rarely tells you much about how a coach will perform in the long-run.

That's it for this week.

GBO!
 
Last edited:
#5
#5
Good job once again. Always a good read. Especially agree with your assessment of Helton's scheme to work around our o-line deficiencies and your focus on the big picture, something many on here can't see when blinded by their "win-immediately-or-the-coach-sucks" mentality.
 
#7
#7
Another painful loss for the good guys. We've improved significantly since last season, but still frustrating to lose games like this. Here are my thoughts.


Offense

Tyson Helton. Helton has been a favorite scapegoat for fans this season, but this game more than any other showcases that he's a very good OC. Helton outschemed Muschamp's D consistently thorughout this game. This is the best offensive gameplan I can remember seeing for a UT team in a long while. Combine that with what we saw against Auburn and I'm pretty happy with Helton. To the extent that we've struggled on offense this season, it's had little to do with Helton.

JG. This week, we heard the familiar criticism that JG is poor at reading defenses, but JG didn't really play to script. He did a great job reading the D, recognizing the blitz, and taking advantage of weaknesses. Yet, he had quite a few balls sail on him, which is atypical for JG. He struggled on the last drive with timing, as well. Overall, not a bad game for JG, but also not a great game. I'd give him a "B-" for this one, but still encouraged by his overall improvement in reading defenses.

Jordan + Chandler. Both Jordan and Chandler played great games. Jordan in particular managed to find ways to get yards on plays where he wasn't really give much. I think both of these guys are among the most underrated SEC RBs right now. They are finding ways to get yards with little help from the O-line.

Fils-Aime. I've generally felt that Pruitt's decisions on players have made sense, but I've gotta question why we weren't using CFA at RB before now. In any case, he had a great game and Tyson Helton took full advantage of his skill set. Bravo to CFA and Helton.

Pass blocking. The O-line has continued to improve on pass blocking, but still overall far short of where they need to be. Nevertheless, it's encouraging that they are getting better.

O-line penalties. On the other hand, the O-line penalties were maddening! How many false starts did we have? Look, I get that Butch left a mess at OL; not enough depth; not enough strength; but this coaching staff needs to get a handle on the penalties. This was a 3-point game and we could've easily won it without the penalties.

Scheming away from O-line weaknesses. Already said Helton did an excellent job, but he really pulled out every trick in the book to scheme around the O-line's weaknesses in run blocking.

Overall offense. Lots of room for improvement on offense, but overall, I thought offense was pretty good this game. It was a solid "B+"


Defense

Ugh. On the other hand, the defense was just awful the entire 2nd Half plus that last SC drive in the 1st Half. At some point, Bryan McClendon figured out a weak point in the defense and hammered it relentlessly. South Carolina ran for 224 yards on us, averaging 5.6 yards per carry, and I'd wager to guess those stats are much worse if you look at them only after we took a 14-3 lead. From that point on, South Carolina just obliterated our defense nearly every drive.

Bituli. In spite of our defensive ineptitude, we did have some guys with big games. Bituli was responsible for the pass deflection that resulted in a Shy Tuttle interception. Bituli also should've been credited with a fumble recovery on the one play that the refs screwed up.


Other Things

Bad calls by refs are a consistent theme. I don't think I've ever seen a season where we've been on the wrong end of so many awful calls. We should've had a fumble recovery; instead South Carolina scores a TD because the refs somehow didn't notice that the ball carrier lost the ball almost as soon as he touched it. The defensive pass interference call that lead to a field goal for South Carolina was also terrible. I haven't complained too much about the bad calls, because it really didn't make a difference in games we were getting blown out, but it may have very well handed this game to South Carolina. (And Auburn had a chance late because of a terrible touchdown call that was actually an INT).

Recruiting. It's obvious to anyone we need help at O-line, but I think we need help on D-line even more. Our run D has been awful and we're losing several Seniors (Tuttle, Bain, Johnson, Phillips). We're improving on pass D as the season goes along, but Pruitt's biggest challenge right now is going to be to figure out how to make this run D competitive. If we can't stop teams from running *WHEN WE KNOW THEY ARE GOING TO RUN*, we're not going to win many games.

Bowl game. As annoyed as I was at SEC Network for constantly showing the bowl game graphic, this loss hurts our chances substantially. We now need to beat Charlotte next week and then win 2 out of 3 against Kentucky, Mizzou, and Vandy. It's do-able, but it will not be easy.

Overall takeaways. This is a tricky game to analyze. We saw significant improvement in some areas, but our run D was horrendous! .South Carolina has not even been that good at running the ball. If SC can run that well on us, Kentucky and Mizzou could absolutely eat us alive! Also the O-line penalties continue to hurt us badly. While not as obvious as the porous run D, it's entirely conceivably that the O-line penalties cost us anywhere from 3 - 14 points.

The Big Picture. In spite of our frustrations in this game, important to keep the big picture in mind. 1st year coaches are almost never successful. Even the all-time greats have struggled in the 1st season (Saban, Carroll, Stoops, etc, etc, etc). As much as I want to see improvement week to week and during this last month of the season, ultimately, we'll get a better sense of what kinda coach Pruitt is during the offseason (recruiting) and during Years 2 and 3. Year #1 very rarely tells you much about how a coach will perform in the long-run.

That's it for this week.

GBO!
The bad calls area; the touchdown catch for Usc where the receiver was out of the end zone before he had control of the ball was another head shaker. They review every touchdown except the ones questionable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RollerVol
#8
#8
This is to neither support or discredit the OP’s post. Simply stated as fact.

First year as a head coach in college football:

Saban (Toledo) 9-2 conference co-champion; 6-5 the year before he arrived

Carroll (USC) 6-6; 5-7 the year before he arrived

Stoops (Oklahoma) 7-5; 5-6 the year before he arrived

Correct me if you’re aware of any mistakes made here.
 
#9
#9
This is to neither support or discredit the OP’s post. Simply stated as fact.

First year as a head coach in college football:

Saban (Toledo) 9-2 conference co-champion; 6-5 the year before he arrived

Carroll (USC) 6-6; 5-7 the year before he arrived

Stoops (Oklahoma) 7-5; 5-6 the year before he arrived

Correct me if you’re aware of any mistakes made here.

Don't forget:

Charlie Weis (Notre Dame) 9-3, 6-6 previous year
Larry Coker (Miami) 12-0, 11-1 previous year
Jim Mora (UCLA) 9-5, 6-8 previous year

Or these:

Barry Alvarez (Wisconsin) 1-10, 2-9 previous year
Don James (Kent State) 3-8, 3-7 previous year
Frank Beamer (VA Tech) 2-9, 9-2-1 previous year

As weird as it seems, the correlation between 1st year results and overall success in college football is pretty low. I suspect that this is because college football is a very developmental sport, so normally you're seeing the "development" from the previous coach during Year 1.
 
#10
#10
Helton had his best plan and called a good game. I'm not gonna confuse the idea that hes been doing that all year tho. He caught rightful questioning early and is getting his props now. The scheme runs much better when JG is not asked to make a lot of reads he hit a high percentage of the swings and slants where its predetermined where the ball is going. If hes asked to read down field where it's not a called throw to a specific spot hes going to struggle.

On the flip side the defense normally gets their feet under them after a quarter, makes adjustments, and settles in. They got worse as the game went on. They never really slowed down SCs running game and later started giving up pass plays down field.

I felt like Pruitt should have punted instead of going for it. But outside that theres not much to complain about as far as decisions go and that's one you can make an argument for. Maybe being more aggressive before the half ended. Expected a few penalties on offense especially by the OL but that level is concerning.

UT did something they havent been doing against conferences teams in getting out the gate better. Finding 6 wins got harder but they are still there to get.
 
#11
#11
Another painful loss for the good guys. We've improved significantly since last season, but still frustrating to lose games like this. Here are my thoughts.


Offense

Tyson Helton. Helton has been a favorite scapegoat for fans this season, but this game more than any other showcases that he's a very good OC. Helton outschemed Muschamp's D consistently thorughout this game. This is the best offensive gameplan I can remember seeing for a UT team in a long while. Combine that with what we saw against Auburn and I'm pretty happy with Helton. To the extent that we've struggled on offense this season, it's had little to do with Helton.

JG. This week, we heard the familiar criticism that JG is poor at reading defenses, but JG didn't really play to script. He did a great job reading the D, recognizing the blitz, and taking advantage of weaknesses. Yet, he had quite a few balls sail on him, which is atypical for JG. He struggled on the last drive with timing, as well. Overall, not a bad game for JG, but also not a great game. I'd give him a "B-" for this one, but still encouraged by his overall improvement in reading defenses.

Jordan + Chandler. Both Jordan and Chandler played great games. Jordan in particular managed to find ways to get yards on plays where he wasn't really give much. I think both of these guys are among the most underrated SEC RBs right now. They are finding ways to get yards with little help from the O-line.

Fils-Aime. I've generally felt that Pruitt's decisions on players have made sense, but I've gotta question why we weren't using CFA at RB before now. In any case, he had a great game and Tyson Helton took full advantage of his skill set. Bravo to CFA and Helton.

Pass blocking. The O-line has continued to improve on pass blocking, but still overall far short of where they need to be. Nevertheless, it's encouraging that they are getting better.

O-line penalties. On the other hand, the O-line penalties were maddening! How many false starts did we have? Look, I get that Butch left a mess at OL; not enough depth; not enough strength; but this coaching staff needs to get a handle on the penalties. This was a 3-point game and we could've easily won it without the penalties.

Scheming away from O-line weaknesses. Already said Helton did an excellent job, but he really pulled out every trick in the book to scheme around the O-line's weaknesses in run blocking.

Overall offense. Lots of room for improvement on offense, but overall, I thought offense was pretty good this game. It was a solid "B+"


Defense

Ugh. On the other hand, the defense was just awful the entire 2nd Half plus that last SC drive in the 1st Half. At some point, Bryan McClendon figured out a weak point in the defense and hammered it relentlessly. South Carolina ran for 224 yards on us, averaging 5.6 yards per carry, and I'd wager to guess those stats are much worse if you look at them only after we took a 14-3 lead. From that point on, South Carolina just obliterated our defense nearly every drive.

Bituli. In spite of our defensive ineptitude, we did have some guys with big games. Bituli was responsible for the pass deflection that resulted in a Shy Tuttle interception. Bituli also should've been credited with a fumble recovery on the one play that the refs screwed up.


Other Things

Bad calls by refs are a consistent theme. I don't think I've ever seen a season where we've been on the wrong end of so many awful calls. We should've had a fumble recovery; instead South Carolina scores a TD because the refs somehow didn't notice that the ball carrier lost the ball almost as soon as he touched it. The defensive pass interference call that lead to a field goal for South Carolina was also terrible. I haven't complained too much about the bad calls, because it really didn't make a difference in games we were getting blown out, but it may have very well handed this game to South Carolina. (And Auburn had a chance late because of a terrible touchdown call that was actually an INT).

Recruiting. It's obvious to anyone we need help at O-line, but I think we need help on D-line even more. Our run D has been awful and we're losing several Seniors (Tuttle, Bain, Johnson, Phillips). We're improving on pass D as the season goes along, but Pruitt's biggest challenge right now is going to be to figure out how to make this run D competitive. If we can't stop teams from running *WHEN WE KNOW THEY ARE GOING TO RUN*, we're not going to win many games.

Bowl game. As annoyed as I was at SEC Network for constantly showing the bowl game graphic, this loss hurts our chances substantially. We now need to beat Charlotte next week and then win 2 out of 3 against Kentucky, Mizzou, and Vandy. It's do-able, but it will not be easy.

Overall takeaways. This is a tricky game to analyze. We saw significant improvement in some areas, but our run D was horrendous! .South Carolina has not even been that good at running the ball. If SC can run that well on us, Kentucky and Mizzou could absolutely eat us alive! Also the O-line penalties continue to hurt us badly. While not as obvious as the porous run D, it's entirely conceivably that the O-line penalties cost us anywhere from 3 - 14 points.

The Big Picture. In spite of our frustrations in this game, important to keep the big picture in mind. 1st year coaches are almost never successful. Even the all-time greats have struggled in the 1st season (Saban, Carroll, Stoops, etc, etc, etc). As much as I want to see improvement week to week and during this last month of the season, ultimately, we'll get a better sense of what kinda coach Pruitt is during the offseason (recruiting) and during Years 2 and 3. Year #1 very rarely tells you much about how a coach will perform in the long-run.

That's it for this week.

GBO!
Spot on. No arguments here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RollerVol
#12
#12
USC had better enjoy that homecoming. That will possibly be the last win they get from us in a while. The game was a good game just wish score had been reversed.
 
#13
#13
I would only add a comment about the secondary. Shades of Mosely chasing Oklahoma and Florida receivers in route to game-winning touchdowns. I hope it really is true that Taylor is going to be great, but it was painful to watch him get burnt twice, either of which could have avoided the loss. The no-call on the fumble was maddening, as were the dumbazz unsportsmanship penalties. Seems uncharacteristic for MC in particular. We had that game won.
 
#14
#14
Another painful loss for the good guys. We've improved significantly since last season, but still frustrating to lose games like this. Here are my thoughts.


Offense

Tyson Helton. Helton has been a favorite scapegoat for fans this season, but this game more than any other showcases that he's a very good OC. Helton outschemed Muschamp's D consistently thorughout this game. This is the best offensive gameplan I can remember seeing for a UT team in a long while. Combine that with what we saw against Auburn and I'm pretty happy with Helton. To the extent that we've struggled on offense this season, it's had little to do with Helton.

JG. This week, we heard the familiar criticism that JG is poor at reading defenses, but JG didn't really play to script. He did a great job reading the D, recognizing the blitz, and taking advantage of weaknesses. Yet, he had quite a few balls sail on him, which is atypical for JG. He struggled on the last drive with timing, as well. Overall, not a bad game for JG, but also not a great game. I'd give him a "B-" for this one, but still encouraged by his overall improvement in reading defenses.

Jordan + Chandler. Both Jordan and Chandler played great games. Jordan in particular managed to find ways to get yards on plays where he wasn't really give much. I think both of these guys are among the most underrated SEC RBs right now. They are finding ways to get yards with little help from the O-line.

Fils-Aime. I've generally felt that Pruitt's decisions on players have made sense, but I've gotta question why we weren't using CFA at RB before now. In any case, he had a great game and Tyson Helton took full advantage of his skill set. Bravo to CFA and Helton.

Pass blocking. The O-line has continued to improve on pass blocking, but still overall far short of where they need to be. Nevertheless, it's encouraging that they are getting better.

O-line penalties. On the other hand, the O-line penalties were maddening! How many false starts did we have? Look, I get that Butch left a mess at OL; not enough depth; not enough strength; but this coaching staff needs to get a handle on the penalties. This was a 3-point game and we could've easily won it without the penalties.

Scheming away from O-line weaknesses. Already said Helton did an excellent job, but he really pulled out every trick in the book to scheme around the O-line's weaknesses in run blocking.

Overall offense. Lots of room for improvement on offense, but overall, I thought offense was pretty good this game. It was a solid "B+"


Defense

Ugh. On the other hand, the defense was just awful the entire 2nd Half plus that last SC drive in the 1st Half. At some point, Bryan McClendon figured out a weak point in the defense and hammered it relentlessly. South Carolina ran for 224 yards on us, averaging 5.6 yards per carry, and I'd wager to guess those stats are much worse if you look at them only after we took a 14-3 lead. From that point on, South Carolina just obliterated our defense nearly every drive.

Bituli. In spite of our defensive ineptitude, we did have some guys with big games. Bituli was responsible for the pass deflection that resulted in a Shy Tuttle interception. Bituli also should've been credited with a fumble recovery on the one play that the refs screwed up.


Other Things

Bad calls by refs are a consistent theme. I don't think I've ever seen a season where we've been on the wrong end of so many awful calls. We should've had a fumble recovery; instead South Carolina scores a TD because the refs somehow didn't notice that the ball carrier lost the ball almost as soon as he touched it. The defensive pass interference call that lead to a field goal for South Carolina was also terrible. I haven't complained too much about the bad calls, because it really didn't make a difference in games we were getting blown out, but it may have very well handed this game to South Carolina. (And Auburn had a chance late because of a terrible touchdown call that was actually an INT).

Recruiting. It's obvious to anyone we need help at O-line, but I think we need help on D-line even more. Our run D has been awful and we're losing several Seniors (Tuttle, Bain, Johnson, Phillips). We're improving on pass D as the season goes along, but Pruitt's biggest challenge right now is going to be to figure out how to make this run D competitive. If we can't stop teams from running *WHEN WE KNOW THEY ARE GOING TO RUN*, we're not going to win many games.

Bowl game. As annoyed as I was at SEC Network for constantly showing the bowl game graphic, this loss hurts our chances substantially. We now need to beat Charlotte next week and then win 2 out of 3 against Kentucky, Mizzou, and Vandy. It's do-able, but it will not be easy.

Overall takeaways. This is a tricky game to analyze. We saw significant improvement in some areas, but our run D was horrendous! .South Carolina has not even been that good at running the ball. If SC can run that well on us, Kentucky and Mizzou could absolutely eat us alive! Also the O-line penalties continue to hurt us badly. While not as obvious as the porous run D, it's entirely conceivably that the O-line penalties cost us anywhere from 3 - 14 points.

The Big Picture. In spite of our frustrations in this game, important to keep the big picture in mind. 1st year coaches are almost never successful. Even the all-time greats have struggled in the 1st season (Saban, Carroll, Stoops, etc, etc, etc). As much as I want to see improvement week to week and during this last month of the season, ultimately, we'll get a better sense of what kinda coach Pruitt is during the offseason (recruiting) and during Years 2 and 3. Year #1 very rarely tells you much about how a coach will perform in the long-run.

That's it for this week.

GBO!
Thanks for keeping it real and understanding where we are at and not speaking out of our you know what. Breath of fresh air. Keep it up man! Everything you stated is exactly how I feel
 
#15
#15
Another painful loss for the good guys. We've improved significantly since last season, but still frustrating to lose games like this. Here are my thoughts.


Offense

Tyson Helton. Helton has been a favorite scapegoat for fans this season, but this game more than any other showcases that he's a very good OC. Helton outschemed Muschamp's D consistently thorughout this game. This is the best offensive gameplan I can remember seeing for a UT team in a long while. Combine that with what we saw against Auburn and I'm pretty happy with Helton. To the extent that we've struggled on offense this season, it's had little to do with Helton.

JG. This week, we heard the familiar criticism that JG is poor at reading defenses, but JG didn't really play to script. He did a great job reading the D, recognizing the blitz, and taking advantage of weaknesses. Yet, he had quite a few balls sail on him, which is atypical for JG. He struggled on the last drive with timing, as well. Overall, not a bad game for JG, but also not a great game. I'd give him a "B-" for this one, but still encouraged by his overall improvement in reading defenses.

Jordan + Chandler. Both Jordan and Chandler played great games. Jordan in particular managed to find ways to get yards on plays where he wasn't really give much. I think both of these guys are among the most underrated SEC RBs right now. They are finding ways to get yards with little help from the O-line.

Fils-Aime. I've generally felt that Pruitt's decisions on players have made sense, but I've gotta question why we weren't using CFA at RB before now. In any case, he had a great game and Tyson Helton took full advantage of his skill set. Bravo to CFA and Helton.

Pass blocking. The O-line has continued to improve on pass blocking, but still overall far short of where they need to be. Nevertheless, it's encouraging that they are getting better.

O-line penalties. On the other hand, the O-line penalties were maddening! How many false starts did we have? Look, I get that Butch left a mess at OL; not enough depth; not enough strength; but this coaching staff needs to get a handle on the penalties. This was a 3-point game and we could've easily won it without the penalties.

Scheming away from O-line weaknesses. Already said Helton did an excellent job, but he really pulled out every trick in the book to scheme around the O-line's weaknesses in run blocking.

Overall offense. Lots of room for improvement on offense, but overall, I thought offense was pretty good this game. It was a solid "B+"


Defense

Ugh. On the other hand, the defense was just awful the entire 2nd Half plus that last SC drive in the 1st Half. At some point, Bryan McClendon figured out a weak point in the defense and hammered it relentlessly. South Carolina ran for 224 yards on us, averaging 5.6 yards per carry, and I'd wager to guess those stats are much worse if you look at them only after we took a 14-3 lead. From that point on, South Carolina just obliterated our defense nearly every drive.

Bituli. In spite of our defensive ineptitude, we did have some guys with big games. Bituli was responsible for the pass deflection that resulted in a Shy Tuttle interception. Bituli also should've been credited with a fumble recovery on the one play that the refs screwed up.


Other Things

Bad calls by refs are a consistent theme. I don't think I've ever seen a season where we've been on the wrong end of so many awful calls. We should've had a fumble recovery; instead South Carolina scores a TD because the refs somehow didn't notice that the ball carrier lost the ball almost as soon as he touched it. The defensive pass interference call that lead to a field goal for South Carolina was also terrible. I haven't complained too much about the bad calls, because it really didn't make a difference in games we were getting blown out, but it may have very well handed this game to South Carolina. (And Auburn had a chance late because of a terrible touchdown call that was actually an INT).

Recruiting. It's obvious to anyone we need help at O-line, but I think we need help on D-line even more. Our run D has been awful and we're losing several Seniors (Tuttle, Bain, Johnson, Phillips). We're improving on pass D as the season goes along, but Pruitt's biggest challenge right now is going to be to figure out how to make this run D competitive. If we can't stop teams from running *WHEN WE KNOW THEY ARE GOING TO RUN*, we're not going to win many games.

Bowl game. As annoyed as I was at SEC Network for constantly showing the bowl game graphic, this loss hurts our chances substantially. We now need to beat Charlotte next week and then win 2 out of 3 against Kentucky, Mizzou, and Vandy. It's do-able, but it will not be easy.

Overall takeaways. This is a tricky game to analyze. We saw significant improvement in some areas, but our run D was horrendous! .South Carolina has not even been that good at running the ball. If SC can run that well on us, Kentucky and Mizzou could absolutely eat us alive! Also the O-line penalties continue to hurt us badly. While not as obvious as the porous run D, it's entirely conceivably that the O-line penalties cost us anywhere from 3 - 14 points.

The Big Picture. In spite of our frustrations in this game, important to keep the big picture in mind. 1st year coaches are almost never successful. Even the all-time greats have struggled in the 1st season (Saban, Carroll, Stoops, etc, etc, etc). As much as I want to see improvement week to week and during this last month of the season, ultimately, we'll get a better sense of what kinda coach Pruitt is during the offseason (recruiting) and during Years 2 and 3. Year #1 very rarely tells you much about how a coach will perform in the long-run.

That's it for this week.

GBO!


Thank you, DG, for proving that there is a bit of sanity left around here. Gonna be an interesting last 4 weeks of the regular season.
 
#16
#16
ignot Saw a lot of snaps at ILB. Run fits weren’t great but it’s a learning experience. Great to see Pruitt getting the you get guys on the field. Kinda aeems like he’s looking ahead to next season in a lot of respects.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DiderotsGhost
#17
#17
Great summary as always, DG.

The true test of Pruitt in Year 1 is learning to beat KY, Vandy and Mizzou. Go bowling and I'm sold on Pruitt for the long term; miss out and this season looks a lot like Butch Year 1 with no Dobbs / Kamara talent to keep his job for five years.

In the SEC, DLine is the most important group after QB. We need eight or so in this class. I feel development has been excellent this year and Pruitt is teaching the young men how to play SEC football again. But Pruitt has to be an elite recruiter as well. How he recruits D-Line in this cycle is going to be his off-season litmus test.
 
#18
#18
Fils-Aime has a lot of speed but a little light.
He needed depth in the back-end more than he needed RB's. I think Pruitt knew coming in we were thin at safety with our injuries there
And a little slow. He started the game with the safeties back and SC came out with the 2 tight end sets forcing us to bring a safety up. They hadn't done that all year and credit that to the off week.That last drive of 1st half they had they went back to 4 wide and we didn't adjust and they were able make some plays. I'm sure at half Pruitt knew he had to pick his poison either try and stop the run or let them get over the top. We just ain't got the hoss's for ones to ones we have to scheme for help.
It's good to finally read about some football
on here. I know we got the right guy and once he gets his process going it will be fun again on Rocky Top.
 
#20
#20
I would only add a comment about the secondary. Shades of Mosely chasing Oklahoma and Florida receivers in route to game-winning touchdowns. I hope it really is true that Taylor is going to be great, but it was painful to watch him get burnt twice, either of which could have avoided the loss. The no-call on the fumble was maddening, as were the dumbazz unsportsmanship penalties. Seems uncharacteristic for MC in particular. We had that game won.

Good point, but I would add the caveat --- watching the game and looking at the stats from the 2nd half, South Carolina was imposing its will running the ball. When you're unable to stop the run, it typically means your defense has to bring more guys in. This, of course, makes it easier to pass.

South Carolina's run to pass ratio was very lopsided that 2nd half. Bryan McClendon played it brilliantly and burnt us with passes just when our defense was settled in on stopping the run.

So I'm not sure how much we can take away from that. Ultimately, the bigger problem was the inability to stop the run, which then weakened our pass defense, as well.
 
#21
#21
This is to neither support or discredit the OP’s post. Simply stated as fact.

First year as a head coach in college football:

Saban (Toledo) 9-2 conference co-champion; 6-5 the year before he arrived

Carroll (USC) 6-6; 5-7 the year before he arrived

Stoops (Oklahoma) 7-5; 5-6 the year before he arrived

Correct me if you’re aware of any mistakes made here.

There's only been three first year head coaches in college football? Wow, that's a surprising "fact".
 
#22
#22
The defense did not play well and that would be a major cause for concern if I were Pruitt. One of the selling points for hiring him was his defensive prowess under Saban and others. They did not looked well coached or well schemed against SC which has a very pedestrian offense. The offense played well enough to win against a decent SEC defense.
 
#23
#23
There's only been three first year head coaches in college football? Wow, that's a surprising "fact".

For the three you have listed, there are dozens who never improved like the three exceptions listed. We have no idea what Pruitt will turn out to be because there is no track record of success as a head coach. Yes, he may be the next successful coach at UT but if the past three hires are any indication then we will be looking for a new head coach in 4 years.
 
#24
#24
There's only been three first year head coaches in college football? Wow, that's a surprising "fact".

First year as a head coach for once successful defensive coordinators:
Kevin Steele: 1-10; year two 2-9
Ellis Johnson: 0-12; year two fired
Greg Robinson: 0-10; year two 0-8

We have no idea what we have as a coach and won't for several years
 
#25
#25
There's only been three first year head coaches in college football? Wow, that's a surprising "fact".
Clearly not. I was only using the examples listed in the op’s post.

And the facts presented were with regard to the coaches listed. No one ever said those were the only three. Literally no one. You just created that in your mind.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top