DG's Completely Unscientific Game-by-Game Preview

#1

DiderotsGhost

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
4,627
Likes
23,503
#1
It’s been a long time since I posted here on VN. For all that are interested (and bored waiting for the season to start), here’s my worthless, completely unscientific, but marginally mathematically synopsis of the upcoming season, game-by-game.

Would love to hear everyone else's take on the season as well.


Appalachian State.


Appy State is underrated. This is a team that went 11-2 last year, with a bowl win, and finished #60 in the Sagarin ratings. That puts Appy State ahead of South Carolina and Mizzou, but behind Bowling Green and Memphis. Speaking of BG, this game might be pretty similar. App State had a great offense last year but gave up a lot of points to higher quality competition. Appy State is certainly capable of giving us a fight, but on a talent basis, we’re much better than them. It’s a game we could lose if we come in unprepared, but Butch Jones has always our guys ready to compete on opening day. I expect us to win.

Odds of Winning: 93%


Virginia Tech.

Justin Fuente is one of the best coaches in college football; he proved that at Memphis by turning around one of the worst programs in all of I-A college football. During the Frank Beamer years, VT perpetually overachieved on defense and perpetually underachieved on offense. Bud Foster is one of the best DCs in the nation. Fuente is one of the best offensive minds in the game. Given this combo, VT could be a force to be reckoned with very soon. Nevertheless, Fuente will only be coaching his 2nd game at VT and it will take time to get the system working and bring in the players to make it work.

The caveat, however, is that this will be a weird game. There’s never been an atmosphere in a college football game like the one that we’ll see at the “Battle at Bristol.” There will be a crowd of over 150,000 people, but the fans will also be much further removed from the players than typical, creating a potentially a very odd game environment. It’s difficult to say how the playing surface will impact things, as well.

We should be favored to win, but this will be a very "different" game, with many “wildcards” that we can’t predict. Nevertheless, I am glad that we are playing VT now rather than 3 years from now. The Justin Fuente hire was one of the best of the off-season IMO.

I think we win, but tough to say whether it will be close or a blowout without seeing this Fuente-coached VT team in action at least once.

Odds of Winning: 80%


Ohio.

I won’t lie: I don’t know much about Ohio U, but I don’t expect us to lose. Ohio’s not a bad team and they actually lost to Appy State by 2 points in their bowl game last season. However, Sagarin had Appy State at #60 and Ohio at #95. Ohio finished last season at 8-5. Hope our players don’t overlook this game, but I’d be surprised if we lost.

Odds of Winning: 99%


Florida.

The streak sucks, but let’s be honest: this is the first year in a very long time where we have superior talent to Florida. As much as Vol fans bemoan the losses the past two seasons, we really outperformed expectations in terms of talent in both of those games.

As leery as I am of predicting a victory, I have to think we’re the favorites this year, and that we should win this game. The media underrated Florida last year, ignoring the immense talent on defense. This year, I think the media is overrating Florida a bit. That said, this game is never easy. My prediction is we win big this year.

Odds of Winning: 72%


@ Georgia.

Don’t underestimate Georgia. In terms of talent, Georgia is the only team in the SEC East that is on par with us. Georgia has underperformed for years. If Kirby Smart gets this team playing to its talent level, UGA will be very difficult to beat. Indeed, Georgia in 2016 may be in a similar position as Florida in 2015, with the media dramatically underestimating the talent on the team.

That said, the QB position is still a huge question mark for UGA. Jacob Eason was a big-time recruit, but he’s also a true Freshman, and it’s difficult to think of too many true Freshmen QBs that didn’t struggle a bit early on (even Peyton Manning struggled early in his Freshman season). Overall, because of our superior QB situation, I think we have a slight edge in terms of talent. Georgia has the home field advantage, however, so I’ll say this is a 50-50 toss-up type of game. Regardless, IMO, this is a must-win game if we want to go to the SEC Championship.

Odds of Winning: 50%



@ Texas A&M.

A&M may be the most underrated team in the SEC going into the season. This team is absolutely loaded with talent on both sides of the ball. Kevin Sumlin is an offensive mastermind. With John Chavis in his 2nd season now, I think that defense starts to produce, particularly with the talent they have on D-line. A&M has the potential to sneak up on the SEC West and win it this year. This is a team that is talented enough to beat us and we’re playing them during the middle of a brutal stretch on the road sandwiched between Georgia and Bama. That’s not good for us.

On the other hand, I think we match up well against A&M. Last year, I predicted we’d lose to Arkansas not because Arkansas was the “better team”, but because we didn’t match up well against them. This year with A&M, I think it’s the reverse. Chavis’s defense is really built around putting pressure on the passer. Its weakness is stopping overwhelming rushing attacks. Guess what we have? The 3-headed monster: Dobbs, Hurd, and Kamara.

That said, the game is in College Station and A&M will be very hungry for a win. It will not be easy. I’m going to call this another 50-50 game.

Odds of Winning: 50%


Alabama.

There are only 3 teams on the schedule this year that are on par with us in terms of talent. Alabama is the only one I’d say that has a clear advantage. Yet, we played them close last year, and even gave them a scare two years ago after making a big comeback. We play in Knoxville this year. Not going to be an easy game, but I can guarantee our guys will be very hungry and very prepared for this game. This is another 50-50 toss-up.

Odds of Winning: 50%


@ South Carolina.

We have beaten South Carolina three years in a row now, but last year’s game was ugly for us and we were fortunate to escape with the “W.” For whatever reason, these guys seem to play us close regardless of talent level. Once again, I have to think we’re big favorites vs SCe, but after playing a stretch that includes Florida, UGA, A&M, and Bama, there always has to be some concern that we’ll have a letdown in a game like this.

Odds of Winning: 82%


Tennessee Tech.

We win. No need for any real analysis. Tn-Tech is a I-AA school and finished 2015 ranked #203 in the Sagarin ratings with a 4-7 record. The only surprise here would be if you don’t see our 2nd and 3rd string in the game by the 3rd Quarter.

Odds of Winning: 99.9%


Kentucky.

Mark Stoops deserves some credit as he’s significantly improved the talent level at Kentucky. He pulled off a win against Mizzou last year and nearly beat Florida. Yet, this Kentucky looked severely overmatched last season against us and that game was in Lexington. We win big again.

Odds of Winning: 92%


Missouri.

Missouri outperformed their talent level for years under Gary Pinkel. Now that Mizzou has a new head coach, it’s possible that they experience a drop-off. Of course, the drop-off actually started last season when Mizzou went 5-7. I still expect this defense to be pretty good, but I also wouldn’t be shocked if Mizzou finishes last in the East this year. They gave us some troubles with their D last year, but couldn’t score against our D. Nothing is impossible, but I think we beat Mizzou handily in Knoxville.

Odds of Winning: 94%


@ Vanderbilt.

In our late season stretch, this is the game that would actually worry me the most. Derek Mason hasn’t had much success in his two seasons at Vandy, but he has surprisingly managed to build one of the best defenses in the conference. We have the better team obviously, but under certain circumstances, I could see Vandy giving us a hard time. Similar to the Mizzou game last year, I wouldn’t be surprised if we win in a low-scoring ugly, boring affair.

Odds of Winning: 84%



Weighted Average Win – Loss Record:

9.46 – 2.54

Based on my "completely unscientific" probabilities, I come up with a weighted-average win total of 9.46 for us.


Overall Analysis.

Obviously, we can’t win 9.46 games, but I view a 10-2 or 9-3 season as most likely.

What this math tells me though is that realistically speaking, even if we’re one of the best teams in America, we’re going to have a difficult time doing better than 10-2. Our end record is going to come down to how we finish games. It could make the difference between 11-1 and 8-4, but I see a 10-2 or 9-3 type season as most likely.

We do have one of the most brutal stretches in all of college football with Florida, @ UGA, @ A&M, and vs Bama. We also have a number of games outside that stretch that while we might be the better team, we could still have some issues if we’re not playing our “A” game. Vanderbilt will be fired up for us, as will South Carolina. Virginia Tech could be a tougher game than expected, as well.

That said, we’re capable of winning every game on this schedule. The Georgia game will also be absolutely critical. A loss to Georgia makes winning the East difficult for us IMO, particularly given that our SEC West schedule is tougher than the other East teams. Whereas, even if we lost to A&M and Bama (god forbid), we could still win the East with wins over UGa and Florida. We'd likely get a re-match in the SEC Championship game and have an outside shot at the playoff.

I'm optimistic, but I don't want to get carried away given the brutal schedule. Even if this is the best squad we've had in over a decade, it's still going to be a tough road to hit 10-2 (or better).

Can't wait for the season to start!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 17 people
#2
#2
Not really getting into the win% variables but I agree with most of the key analysis of Georgia and A&M. Should be two tough games that most are overlooking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#4
#4
Field goal kicker cost us 2 games last year. Fix that and we might whup err'body's azz.
 
#5
#5
"Math" which is, in turn, based on ouija board speculation.

I admitted as much didn't I? ;)

I'm not a big believer in the idea that there is a real "science" to this. People can create models that "look" scientific, but ultimately, you're always making judgement calls.

Interesting seeing various predictions on the season though. Pete Fiutak, a college football writer who I respect immensely and who has a pretty good long-term track record, has us finishing the season 11-1. That will be very difficult, but I'm excited that one of the more knowledgeable writers thinks we're that good.

As for me, I think a 10-2 record with our strength of schedule would be an immensely successful season and should be worthy of consideration for the playoff if we were to win the SECCG.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7
#7
If we play to our potential, it's a 4 game season. Unfortunately, those four games happen to be all in a row.
 
#8
#8
I admitted as much didn't I? ;)

I'm not a big believer in the idea that there is a real "science" to this. People can create models that "look" scientific, but ultimately, you're always making judgement calls.

Interesting seeing various predictions on the season though. Pete Fiutak, a college football writer who I respect immensely and who has a pretty good long-term track record, has us finishing the season 11-1. That will be very difficult, but I'm excited that one of the more knowledgeable writers thinks we're that good.

As for me, I think a 10-2 record with our strength of schedule would be an immensely successful season and should be worthy of consideration for the playoff if we were to win the SECCG.


The problem with setting expectations so high on win-loss is that if you meet them, it's because you were supposed to. If you don't, you failed to meet your potential.

No one ever at the end says that their prediction was too high.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9
#9
Good analysis, DG.

My comments and odds of winning adjustments on the 4 game stretch.

Florida
Odds of Winning: 65%
I don't know that we are really more talented than the gators; I think our advantage is in having more experienced talent.

@ Georgia
Odds of Winning: 60%
The Dawgs are extremely talented, but they have a new HC, a new OC, a new DC, a new QB, and some big questions on the OL and in their Front 7. Chubb and Michel, assuming both are healthy, will be a handful, but like last season, I don't think UGA will be able to slow down our offense at all.


@ Texas A&M.
Odds of Winning: 50%
If Chavis figures out how to get that defense to stop the run (depends on if he finds some answers in the LB corp), and if Trevor Knight is able to be a more complete QB, then UT's odds of winning could go down to about 45% because TAMU has some serious talent all around.

Alabama.
Odds of Winning: 50%
If Bama's new QB, whomever it may be, is comfortable by the UT game, then UT's odds of winning could also decrease to between 40-45%, because like TAMU, the QB is going to have some serious talent at WR and TE to throw the ball to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#10
#10
I actually like your arbitrary math and think in all but once instance its pretty spot on.. giving us 50% on Bama is not realistic. Id call that a 35-40% game. Also I think a lot of folks need to really read what you had to say about florida because its true.
 
#15
#15
Enjoyed your breakdown of the schedule. I think that a lot of fans are underestimating Fl & Ga.

Both are just as talented as us so it's anybody's game IMO.

Ga's 1st yr HC & QB may not make the diff everyone is betting on. Case in point Florida last yr. Same situation and they not only beat us but won the East.

Bama should be a 60/40 their way until proven otherwise IMO.

Team 120 has the horses to beat ANYBODY on the schedule but none of the big 4 will hand it to us and all will be a dog fight.

Fun read
 
#16
#16
Here's my way too long offseason predictions;

App State- we whoop dat azz!
Va Tech- we whoop dat azz in front of 150k!
Ohio- Really? Whoop dat azz
Fl- whoop dat azz
UGA- Whoop dat azz
aTm- Whoop dat azz
Bammer- yep. Whoop dat azz
Rest of schedule- Whoopin azz.

I apologize this is not real creative or analytic but it's really not that complicated.

GBMFO!!!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#17
#17
Think we'll know a lot more about our opponents in a few weeks based on their QB play. A lot of them have some serious questions at that all important position. As we saw with Florida last year, a good QB makes all the difference.
 
#18
#18
The game that scares me the most is @ TAMU. It is on the road and sandwiched between a road game in Athens and a home game with Alabama. It is the 7th game without a bye and 2nd game in a row on the road. We could be pretty banged up by then.

I believe we will go 10-2 this season but I also believe this team has the talent and experience to run the table. We would need to stay healthy and have some luck on our side to run the table. 9-3 would not be a major disappointment but would be underachieving for this team. 10-2 or anything better I would consider it to be a successful season.
 
#19
#19
Good post, DG. For comparison's sake, here is the predictive percentages from ESPN's FPI:

DATE OPPONENT FPI Chance of Winning
Thu, Sept 1 vs Appalachian State 95.10%
Sat, Sept 10 vs Virginia Tech* 87.70%
Sat, Sept 17 vs Ohio 98.50%
Sat, Sept 24 vs #25*Florida 80.20%
Sat, Oct 1 @ #18*Georgia 58.60%
Sat, Oct 8 @ Texas A&M 59.30%
Sat, Oct 15 vs #1*Alabama 58.90%

Crazy to think about, but we'll pretty much know how the season went at this point.

Sat, Oct 29 @ South Carolina 88.70%
Sat, Nov 5 vs Tennessee Tech 99.80%
Sat, Nov 12 vs Kentucky 93.80%
Sat, Nov 19 vs Missouri 93.90%
Sat, Nov 26 @ Vanderbilt 85.90%

It will be interesting to see how these change after a few weeks. We are going to have 5-6 challenging games no matter what these percentages say. I don't see how we are not absolutely gassed by the time we play Bama. That's a brutal 4 week schedule if all those games are tight into the fourth quarter.

The only thing I know for sure is that my excited vs anxious percentiles are pretty much 50/50.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#20
#20
Think we'll know a lot more about our opponents in a few weeks based on their QB play. A lot of them have some serious questions at that all important position. As we saw with Florida last year, a good QB makes all the difference.

That's why, for once, I actually think we benefit from playing our rivals earlier in the season. Jacob Eason may develop into a great SEC QB, but he'll only have, at most, four games worth of experience when we play Georgia (and one of those games is against a garbage opponent).

Similar deal with Luke Del Rio at Florida. While Del Rio has "been around" longer than Jacob Eason, he's really only played a few garbage time possessions in the past (at Oregon State). Moreover, Florida only has two cupcake games (UMass and North Texas) and a weaker SEC opponent (Kentucky) before they visit Knoxville.

So both Del Rio and Eason are going to be facing our tenacious D-line with very limited experience in those sorts of situations.
 
#21
#21
i'm reading this and trying to figure out what i should post.

not sure about the science, or lack thereof...:) but i do think that fans in general tend to look at schedules in whole, and not as singular parts...i know i do.

there's not a single game, in and of itself that i don't think we could win.

but you start stringing them together, consecutively like has happened this year, and you start to say "no way we can win all four of those in a row".

rather, we rationalize...4-0 is fantasy...3-1 outstanding....2-2 would be good.

but then we can't leave it at that...now we start playing the "which 2? game and wind up driving ourselves nuts.

so, for me, putting the science to the side....i say you beat FLorida and then start worrying about the rest of the schedule. right now, i can't get myself to worry about the rest of the games, until/unless we beat FL.

and that's not to say it's the most important game or it's a make or break game, but it is to say that i do believe starting that stretch off wiht a win is important.

momentum and confidence is what this team will need. we failed to do that for ourselves last year, and it translated in to hangovers....

so...let's beat FL and just see what we can do with the rest of the schedule.:thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#22
#22
Here's a rank of possible losses:

1) A&M: classic trap game, on the road, noisy enviro
2) Bama: tough defense, will stop our running game
3) UGA: lot of talent, almost same level as Bama
4) UF: we get them this year, but will be close

I think we go 11-1, and only loss to A&M.

What favors UT is our pass rush versus Bama & UGA with new QBs-- that will be the difference in these two games.
 
#23
#23
Here's my way too long offseason predictions;

App State- we whoop dat azz!
Va Tech- we whoop dat azz in front of 150k!
Ohio- Really? Whoop dat azz
Fl- whoop dat azz
UGA- Whoop dat azz
aTm- Whoop dat azz
Bammer- yep. Whoop dat azz
Rest of schedule- Whoopin azz.

I apologize this is not real creative or analytic but it's really not that complicated.

GBMFO!!!

I like your style! :rock:
 
#24
#24
Here's my way too long offseason predictions;

App State- we whoop dat azz!
Va Tech- we whoop dat azz in front of 150k!
Ohio- Really? Whoop dat azz
Fl- whoop dat azz
UGA- Whoop dat azz
aTm- Whoop dat azz
Bammer- yep. Whoop dat azz
Rest of schedule- Whoopin azz.

I apologize this is not real creative or analytic but it's really not that complicated.

GBMFO!!!

Eloquent....love it.
 

VN Store



Back
Top