Sara Clark
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2015
- Messages
- 5,294
- Likes
- 17,442
No its not, no it isnt and no its not.This is another example of shooting the messenger. What he said is basically correct. We may not like it; but, sadly, it's our reality.
It was not just coaching. The failures started at the top and filtered down through the entire structure. Poor management and planning. Fulmer seems to have a vision for the way ahead. Good thing is that he is a football guy. He should have an idea of how to fix things.
If he said that we haven't been "good" since 2001? He is dead wrong. We were good in 2004. If he said that we haven't been "great" since 2001, I might concede the point. There seems to be a discrepancy in the reporting of what he actually said. I wasn't watching.This is another example of shooting the messenger. What he said is basically correct. We may not like it; but, sadly, it's our reality.
It was not just coaching. The failures started at the top and filtered down through the entire structure. Poor management and planning. Fulmer seems to have a vision for the way ahead. Good thing is that he is a football guy. He should have an idea of how to fix things.
To say we've not been good since 2001 is intellectually incorrect, unless 10-3 and 10-4 teams are considered bad. 10-3 twice, 10-4 once.
I don’t understand why anyone says we backed into a championship game, like some kind of apology because we made it. We won our way there just like everyone else, not like we went because another team was on probation or something. We happened to win the right games, it happens with any team that makes it that isn’t undefeated. You could say LSU backed their way in too. We lost the 2003 appearance because of the tiebreaker, so this helped make up for it a little bit.Even then we backed into the Championship game and finished 10-4 and 6-2 in conference