SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 55,911
- Likes
- 70,019
You cannot deny that private schools provide a more than adequate learning environment..... many of which are less expensive on a per student basis than the public system ..... even if you're biased due to you being a teacher's aideThat is as true as this: It's not the schools, it's the dumb, lazy, unmotivated students who undervalue the importance of an education.
A lot of that probably has to do with home life and parental support. If you send your kid to private schools, you're much morelikely to push them to take it seriously. You're much more likely to be involved in the system. Public school's biggest problem is probably the fact that the majority of parents don't make education a priority and aren't involved. They look at the public school system as free gov't-paid baby-sitting.You cannot deny that private schools provide a more than adequate learning environment..... many of which are less expensive on a per student basis than the public system ..... even if you're biased due to you being a teacher's aide
I don't deny that. The point I'm trying to make is that "private" schools are more than capable of providing a good education. Loother seems to think only the government is capable of suchA lot of that probably has to do with home life and parental support. If you send your kid to private schools, you're much morelikely to push them to take it seriously. You're much more likely to be involved in the system. Public school's biggest problem is probably the fact that the majority of parents don't make education a priority and aren't involved. They look at the public school system as free gov't-paid baby-sitting.
I would agree with that. I also agree at an ideological and rational level that private sector could do it cheaper due to more expertise and less bureaucracy. I just don't think that the example you used makes those points.I don't deny that. The point I'm trying to make is that "private" schools are more than capable of providing a good education. Loother seems to think only the government is capable of such
Once again, this gets a little monotonous, I never once said private schools are incapable of providing a good education, of course they are. What I have said is that private schools are incapable (and unwilling) to provide a good education to everyone....thus, the need for public schools. That's sort of the whole point. You guys crack me up with your constant chasm between what you think is being said and what is actually said.I don't deny that. The point I'm trying to make is that "private" schools are more than capable of providing a good education. Loother seems to think only the government is capable of such
If everyone paid the tuition I bet they could do itOnce again, this gets a little monotonous, I never once said private schools are incapable of providing a good education, of course they are. What I have said is that private schools are incapable (and unwilling) to provide a good education to everyone....thus, the need for public schools. That's sort of the whole point. You guys crack me up with your constant chasm between what you think is being said and what is actually said.
You would be incorrect,Im guessing you think Harvard Business should be free too.
You would be incorrect,
How Aid Works | Harvard College
"In fact, approximately 70 percent of our students receive some form of aid, and about 60 percent receive need–based scholarships and pay an average of $12,000 per year. Twenty percent of parents pay nothing. No loans required."
Seems as if Harvard has it figured out and created their own little "mini" government.
It almost sounds like you're making an argument for private education.You would be incorrect,
How Aid Works | Harvard College
"In fact, approximately 70 percent of our students receive some form of aid, and about 60 percent receive need–based scholarships and pay an average of $12,000 per year. Twenty percent of parents pay nothing. No loans required."
Seems as if Harvard has it figured out and created their own little "mini" government.
No one is stopping the next Harvard. If there were no need for public education, we wouldn't have public education.
In case you didn't see my edit:
- Aid is based entirely on need, not merit.
lol...I vaguely remember you rambling on about something nonsensical.That's easy for you to say. That's like the mafia saying,"If there was no need for this protection racket, there wouldn't be a protection racket."
Remember all those times you were reminded that you need to rationally ground an argument, and is==ought is a logical fallacy?
Yah. You it's still true.
No one is stopping the next Harvard. If there were no need for public education, we wouldn't have public education.
In case you didn't see my edit:
- Aid is based entirely on need, not merit.
So let's "educate" the "needy" kids, and tell the smart ones that they can pay up or dig ditches. Your philosophy put into practice will ensure that America lags behind other parts of the world... and kids from other countries that come here to study. Government in action.No one is stopping the next Harvard. If there were no need for public education, we wouldn't have public education.
In case you didn't see my edit:
- Aid is based entirely on need, not merit.