Defending Fulmer

So did Chavis, Sanders et al.

:hi:

But he won the NC without Cut.

We scored 16 offensive points on Florida State. Don't act like it was some form of offensive juggernaut.

Not to mention Cut probably still helped with the gameplan.

Cutcliffe helped get them there. A lot. There's two reasons why we couldn't run the ball dominantly after 1998.
 
That would be acceptable at a place like South Carolina or Kentucky. It should not be acceptable at UT.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

what's it matter to you 3 in 7 years is pretty good...
considering USCe has how many ever?

1

another example of trolling...throwing out half azz statements
 
what's it matter to you 3 in 7 years is pretty good...
considering USCe has how many ever?

1

another example of trolling...throwing out half azz statements

Three since 98 is not. Zero championships since 98 is not. That's the point. But then again, you're a Fulmerite. You enjoy mediocrity.

Oh, and please explain how my post was a 'half-azzed statement,' as you so eloquently put it.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Last edited:
Why is a south carolina fan on here posting 100 times about how bad PF is/was? Posting about anything UT fb, tbh. Do we have people on the sc site arguing about Spurrier? Surely not. How embarrassing.
 
Why is a south carolina fan on here posting 100 times about how bad PF is/was? Posting about anything UT fb, tbh. Do we have people on the sc site arguing about Spurrier? Surely not. How embarrassing.

because he's a troll
 
We scored 16 offensive points on Florida State. Don't act like it was some form of offensive juggernaut.

I think this is the most ridiculous statement ever posted on Volnation.

Approaching pg 100, and this is what the anti-Fulmer crowd throws out.

It is no wonder the anti-Fulmer crowd is so routinely taken behind the woodshed.
 
I think this is the most ridiculous statement ever posted on Volnation.

Approaching pg 100, and this is what the anti-Fulmer crowd throws out.

It is no wonder the anti-Fulmer crowd is so routinely taken behind the woodshed
.

Just as it should be.
 
It is no wonder the anti-Fulmer crowd is so routinely taken behind the woodshed.

Stating that if Fulmer had stayed that Ahmad Paige and Donald Langley would have taken us to the NC is not taking the anti-Fulmer crowd behind the woodshed. It is, however, taking logic behind the woodshed though.

Just for the record, I'm not anti-Fulmer but I do not apologize for knowing that is was obvious it was time for him to go the direction of the program was going down and we were further and further behind our rivals.
 
50255_31167519355_1386669_n.jpg
 
Why is a south carolina fan on here posting 100 times about how bad PF is/was? Posting about anything UT fb, tbh. Do we have people on the sc site arguing about Spurrier? Surely not. How embarrassing.

I wasn't aware you had to be UT fan to discuss UT football. Forgive me.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Original Gang of Five (GoF):

Hatvol
kpt
SGM
VolDad
VKA

Professor emeritus: bigpapavol (BPV)

There are some acolytes who have sympathies with the warped point of view, but are at least sensible enough not to bullhorn it across the forum.

This list has been given many, many times, and since kpt DOES use the search function to find my posts every singe day (he's not banned), he's seen this list often, though, as is his nature, will claim not to have seen it.

Is this like the legion of doom or something?
 
I wasn't aware you had to be UT fan to discuss UT football. Forgive me.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

You don't. But you on here telling UT fans how they should feel about PF is ridiculous, especially since you give him little respect. State your thought and move on. He didn't have a problem whipping sc's ass, whether in his good years or bad years. That's all you need to know.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
You don't. But you on here telling UT fans how they should feel about PF is ridiculous, especially since you give him little respect. State your thought and move on. He didn't have a problem whipping sc's ass, whether in his good years or bad years. That's all you need to know.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I'm not telling anybody how they should feel about CPF. If Fulmerites want to kiss his arse, that's fine. FYI, stating facts does not equal disrespect. If you have trouble telling the difference, I'm sorry. That's your problem, not mine. And, please, don't brag about him whipping SC. That's like saying he had no trouble whipping Vandy.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Original Gang of Five (GoF):

Hatvol
kpt
SGM
VolDad
VKA

Professor emeritus: bigpapavol (BPV)

There are some acolytes who have sympathies with the warped point of view, but are at least sensible enough not to bullhorn it across the forum.

This list has been given many, many times, and since kpt DOES use the search function to find my posts every singe day (he's not banned), he's seen this list often, though, as is his nature, will claim not to have seen it.

well it's down to the triplets now, since Voldad and Hat have decided to leave the board
 
I'm not telling anybody how they should feel about CPF. If Fulmerites want to kiss his arse, that's fine. FYI, stating facts does not equal disrespect. If you have trouble telling the difference, I'm sorry. That's your problem, not mine. And, please, don't brag about him whipping SC. That's like saying he had no trouble whipping Vandy.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

facts are he whiipped USuCky's asss
 

Advertisement



Back
Top