Seattle Hillbilly
Substitute Smokies
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2011
- Messages
- 1,709
- Likes
- 1,953
Meant to say it will NOT be an issue if SMU wins, but it will if they lose.No they won’t. SMU just had to be the ACC Champ. They aren’t gonna win the ACC title AND somehow be ranked behind the Big 12 winner.
And if they do win the ACC they will be ranked ahead of Boise anyways.
The highest 4 ranked conference champs get the top 4 seeds. SMU doesn’t have to be anything but ACC Champ. Boise and Big 12 winner are irrelevant to SMU securing a bye
Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.They don’t have a case to make
Vandy is a bad loss while Vandy is a good win for Texas and Tennessee?Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
Head to head should always trump all when records are the same.Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
So I take it you were good with Bama going to the CPF two years ago over usBetter resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
South Carolina also lost to Ole MIss and didn't even score 1 TD. They should be 3rd in the bish fest department for 3 loss SEC teams that are hoping to make the playoffs.Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
Bama’s resume is better than SCAR. Better FPI ranking, better SOR, better SOS, and a head-to-head win on top of that. I posted the data in another thread.Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
You don’t know me very well. Only thing I care about with respect to the playoffs is Tennessee winning a natty. I’d much rather play Alabama so I hope they do get in.Bama’s resume is better than SCAR. Better FPI ranking, better SOR, better SOS, and a head-to-head win on top of that. I posted the data in another thread.
Your opinion is fueled by an emotional hatred of Bama - nothing more, nothing less.
I agree, but Alabama’s body of work is better, so they deserve it over SC. I don’t think anyone would argue differently by looking at the metrics side by side unless they have an inherent bias against the Tide.I just think the teams that deserve to get in should get in and not simply the teams with the biggest brand
I’ve made my case for them, but I understand that the majority doesn’t see things the way I do - and I think the committee will agree with the majority.I agree, but Alabama’s body of work is better, so they deserve it over SC. I don’t think anyone would argue differently by looking at the metrics side by side unless they have an inherent bias against the Tide.