Dec. 1 Coaches Poll - Vols 6th

#77
#77
No they won’t. SMU just had to be the ACC Champ. They aren’t gonna win the ACC title AND somehow be ranked behind the Big 12 winner.

And if they do win the ACC they will be ranked ahead of Boise anyways.

The highest 4 ranked conference champs get the top 4 seeds. SMU doesn’t have to be anything but ACC Champ. Boise and Big 12 winner are irrelevant to SMU securing a bye
Meant to say it will NOT be an issue if SMU wins, but it will if they lose.
 
#81
#81
They don’t have a case to make
Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
 
#82
#82
Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
Vandy is a bad loss while Vandy is a good win for Texas and Tennessee?
 
  • Like
Reactions: PEPPERJAX
#83
#83
Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
Head to head should always trump all when records are the same.
 
#84
#84
Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
So I take it you were good with Bama going to the CPF two years ago over us
 
#85
#85
Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
South Carolina also lost to Ole MIss and didn't even score 1 TD. They should be 3rd in the bish fest department for 3 loss SEC teams that are hoping to make the playoffs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#88
#88
Agreed. Put 2 loss Miami in
Totally agree. People want to talk about how impressive bama has been but forget the fact that they have had two losses this year to inferior teams. That Oklahoma loss should have been the nail in the coffin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanhill
#89
#89
If South Carolina were to get in, which I don't believe they will, I think they'd beat Notre Dame in the 1st round. In fact, if I were a ND fan, I might rather play Bama than South Carolina right now.
 
#90
#90
Better resume than Bama. Better team than Bama. I’m sure you’ll use head-to-head as a trump card, but that was a road game for SC and Bama barely survived. Bama’s loss to Oklahoma is the worst loss of any playoff contender besides Notre Dame. They also have the bad loss to Vandy. All of SC’s losses came to teams with 8+ wins.
Bama’s resume is better than SCAR. Better FPI ranking, better SOR, better SOS, and a head-to-head win on top of that. I posted the data in another thread.

Your opinion is fueled by an emotional hatred of Bama - nothing more, nothing less.
 
#91
#91
South Carolina also lost to Ole MIss and didn't even score 1 TD. They should be 3rd in the bish fest department for 3 loss SEC teams that are hoping to make the playoffs.
Are you forgetting the score of the Alabama Oklahoma game, which was less than 2 weeks ago?
 
#93
#93
Are you forgetting the score of the Alabama Oklahoma game, which was less than 2 weeks ago?
No
But you can't ignore head to head matchups. Trust me, I would prefer that bama had no chance in hell of getting into the playoffs but unfortunately they do.
 
#96
#96
Bama’s resume is better than SCAR. Better FPI ranking, better SOR, better SOS, and a head-to-head win on top of that. I posted the data in another thread.

Your opinion is fueled by an emotional hatred of Bama - nothing more, nothing less.
You don’t know me very well. Only thing I care about with respect to the playoffs is Tennessee winning a natty. I’d much rather play Alabama so I hope they do get in.
 
#97
#97
You don’t know me very well. Only thing I care about with respect to the playoffs is Tennessee winning a natty. I’d much rather play Alabama so I hope they do get in.
So why were you advocating for SCAR deserving a bid over Alabama?
 
#99
#99
I just think the teams that deserve to get in should get in and not simply the teams with the biggest brand
I agree, but Alabama’s body of work is better, so they deserve it over SC. I don’t think anyone would argue differently by looking at the metrics side by side unless they have an inherent bias against the Tide.
 
I agree, but Alabama’s body of work is better, so they deserve it over SC. I don’t think anyone would argue differently by looking at the metrics side by side unless they have an inherent bias against the Tide.
I’ve made my case for them, but I understand that the majority doesn’t see things the way I do - and I think the committee will agree with the majority.
 

VN Store



Back
Top