DC Recap

#76
#76
I'd take Spangler over Steele. Spangler is the kind of guy we will look back on, and ask, "Why didn't we hire him?"

Spangler isn't the 'name' hire, but I think it has substance. Unfortunately, that isn't what wins the popularity poll.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#77
#77
I'd take Spangler over Steele. Spangler is the kind of guy we will look back on, and ask, "Why didn't we hire him?"

Spangler isn't the 'name' hire, but I think it has substance. Unfortunately, that isn't what wins the popularity poll.

Kind of like we do with 'Dave Clawson?'
 
#78
#78
I'd take Spangler over Steele. Spangler is the kind of guy we will look back on, and ask, "Why didn't we hire him?"

Spangler isn't the 'name' hire, but I think it has substance. Unfortunately, that isn't what wins the popularity poll.


You could be right but it is a big gamble. Dooley has a lot riding on this hire (like his job).
 
#81
#81
i "steele" think steele is a good coordinator and a great recruiter. it sucks that the orange bowl put him out of contention at least to the public.
 
#82
#82
i "steele" think steele is a good coordinator and a great recruiter. it sucks that the orange bowl put him out of contention at least to the public.

ATP, I'd take him. The orange bowl didn't do him any favors but neither did the Alamo Bowl for Bennett--or pretty much all of 2011, for that matter.

....ugh. I'm sick of this sh*t, I probably need to stay off VN for a few days but that'd be like kicking a heroin addiction.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top