Orange_Crush
Resident windbag genius
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2004
- Messages
- 41,857
- Likes
- 84,778
UT has no 5-star DEs committed. In fact the closest candidate UT has to Hendrix is Phillips and he is not committed and rated lower than Hendriz was. Also, you are off for thinking it's a Barnett "or" Hendrix argument. Hendrix was 2nd team as a true freshman. Teams with lots of talent rotate. It keeps starters fresh. I have no idea what the snap counts were and I doubt you do either.
Take a look at Calipari and see how he manages talent and egos.
And I don't think CBJ cut any of these guys loose. So you're point is getting lost somewhere.
Oh?...you're one of those that rates classes three or four years after they happen. What's Kiffin's lone class down to? How about Saban's last two? They lost highly rated running backs out of those classes....did they keep their #1 rankings? Haven't kept track of their news conferences. When do they release the class rerankings each year? Do Scout,Rivals and ESPN do it on the same day?
Why do you pay so much money for something that causes you so much anguish? :blink:
So let me get this straight, losing marginal guys that didn't play last year and replacing them with more talented guys equates to another 6-6 record? Makes sense.:unsure:
What I really need is when I hire a mechanic, and he's fixing things, is for know-it-alls to come in off the street and start grabbing and twisting. Next thing I know, my engine block's on the interstate...I don't need YouTube experts...I got a guy!
He provided facts in his initial post.
You asked him to provide examples to compare to other teams.
He gives you what you asked for.
You say it's not good enough.
Now, who really looks silly?
Cool. You picked one team to support your flimsy argument. Do you know how Rivals arrives at their rankings? Hint: they only factor in the top 20 highest rated players.
Ford is more talented than Hendrix? Bussey is more talented than Scott? Was it the former names performance's vs Bama and UGA that lead you to this conclusion? I mean surely they've faced SEC competiton before you made your conclusions right?
Can't really say 2014 was a great recruiting class. We have lost too many off that class that were 4 star players. So, either Butch missed on talent evaluation or too many kids don't like what Butch is cooking. Either way, the defections are making Jones look bad and will set the program back for another year. Face it folks, Jones is spinning his wheels.
Ga lost ten from the 2013 to 2014 football seasons. Calm down, it happens. Btw, we signed 32 so we can afford to lose quite a few. If we replace with better guys then it's ok. You don't build depth in 2 years. It's a four year process and right now we are in year 2. Because of Kiffin and Dooley we have to judge Jones on when he got here because he was left nothing as a coach. You guys want Jones to do what no other coach has ever done and that's keep all his recruits. Not even Saban can do that. If we lost the guys who played this year, then I'd be worried (I mean actual contributors and not Hendrix's two tackles). These kids were brought in on the platform of pt, some of them didn't realize the fact that not everyone can play based on depth and ability. It happens guys, depth should start to not be an issue by year 4 of Jones time here. I realized that and I am enjoying the ride. Calm down and let's beat iowa.
Just noticed you joined less than 2 years ago and have 13k posts already; your life must be miserably pathetic to spend that much time on VN. And yet, you post nothing of substance, it's strings of incoherent drivel.
Were those the names I used? I mean surely you realize that I may have been inferring Kamara and Andrew Butcher. Not saying I was, but since you like to jump to conclusions let's exhaust all possibilities before you make your conclusions. Carry on with the hand wringing thinking the sky is falling, the rest of us will sit back and enjoy the ride.
UGA, Bama, LSU AU any other major program you want to use as examples, aren't in the same boat as us. They're not trying to rebuild. Yall are the same tribe that bemoan others during the season to give Butch time, we're rebuilding. Then discount the effect losing players can have on that rebuilding effort and use UGA as proof it's ok.
Don't ***** at others next year, if we have 7 FR seeing significant minutes.
I'm not *****ing dude, you're just too infantile to recognize that. The loss of young players is a concern; from a depth standpoint. Not because its an indictment on the god-head of UT football.
You gotta fixation on Butch's ass there Bowl...one reference is weird...two is a cry for intervention. :scare:
What happens if Butch fails? You're hellbent he's going to be wildly successful here yet he's never rebuilt a program so there's no track record to support it. He's twice followed a national championship level coach, who was wildly successful. If anything, Cincy took a step back under his watch, despite outrecruiting Kelly.
Ok so Butcher is better than Hendrix? Was it Butcher's performance vs UF that led you that conclusion? I'll plug in whatever name you want me to, I just grabbed the first two I thought of. But since you like to make dumbass statements that you have no way of backing up I'd like for you to at least try. What makes Butcher better, how did you conclude this?
I'm UT student and first time poster..please nobody flame me! BUT, I wanted to point out that with the losses of Helm, Hendrix, Scott, Payne, Henderson and Paulk, according to Rivals' 2014 Recruiting Rankings, UT's average star rating, adjusted for 2014 attrition is down to 3.2, from 3.65...which leaves us somewhere below Kentucky, and Mississippi...around #20...not good. I love and support UT...but...this is bad. We are not Bama or Florida...we simply CANNOT afford to lose FIVE 4 star players in Butch's "first" rebuilding class. This is big!
Doesn't sound like your original point or when you defended the other one's that Butch was in trouble "spinning his wheels" because of these players transfers. I let concerns about transfers pretty much go ...they're not exactly unique...but when doomsday starts getting forecast and disagreement means someone is "up Butch's ass", then I am drawn back into this. "Sad Volnation World" where you're not exactly a stranger.
This thought process just doesn't make sense to me though. You can go back and recalculate our star average but what does it matter if our ranking drops to 20 when we have producers like Hurd, Barnett, Robertson etc etc. I would much rather have a 2015 recruiting class ranked 23rd that in the future produces (hypothetical) 3 SEC ALL Americans than a class ranked 9th with one. I feel like what you are doing is pointless in focusing on the ranking instead of the actual production we are getting out of the class.