this whole thing reeks of professional midconduct on the part of SEVERAL coaches mentioned in this thread. It's a whole package. If you would discourage a commit to reconsider AFTER he's already committed then you have a CHARACHTER issue, and, after watching these players for the last 2-3 years, a CHARACHTER issue, instilled by this coaching staff is the major problem.
In KNS today, there is an article about DJ Swearinger, who decommitted. He says his "only correspondence with the vols came shortly after Fulmer's ouster when Dan Brooks told Swearinger to 'do whatever [he] need[ed] to do'".
Am I reading too much into it to see that a possible interpretation is that "do what you need to do, I dont care" is a possibility? Or was Brooks misquoted or was it more like "We love you at TN and we want you to come, but we respect that you need to do some things...do what you need to do".
Also, aside from that, only ONE contact with recruits? That IS troubling.
Do you not remember the huge hole we started in? There was also the whole "getting run out of the stadium by our two biggest rivals" thing. Just because last year's team wandered their way into the SECCG doesn't mean that the coaches were sitting pretty all year.
this whole thing reeks of professional midconduct on the part of SEVERAL coaches mentioned in this thread. It's a whole package. If you would discourage a commit to reconsider AFTER he's already committed then you have a CHARACHTER issue, and, after watching these players for the last 2-3 years, a CHARACHTER issue, instilled by this coaching staff is the major problem.