Da Official Gruden Thread-Zoner Style

#1,817
#1,817
VolGirlinGA said:
Not keeping Pittman.

Meh.
Click to expand...


I don't see how he can. He doesn't have time to teach his playbook and blocking system to a new coach who then has to teach new players. That would put him behind his rebuilding plan. I hope the new ol coach can go in, talk to the guys, explain why their well respected coach isn't there in the big picture, and ask them to give him a chance. Let them know he realizes what they have been through and why they would be upset.
If he handles it like that, all will be fine.
 
#1,819
#1,819
I think there is something to that meeting between Graham and Tee this week.

Hopefully, we hear good things about it soon.
 
#1,820
#1,820
Spartacavolus said:
I don't see how he can. He doesn't have time to teach his playbook and blocking system to a new coach who then has to teach new players. That would put him behind his rebuilding plan. I hope the new ol coach can go in, talk to the guys, explain why their well respected coach isn't there in the big picture, and ask them to give him a chance. Let them know he realizes what they have been through and why they would be upset.
If he handles it like that, all will be fine.
Click to expand...

Hopefully he can sell it that way as Pittman was well liked among those guys.

We have a very good O-Line coming back and I would hate to see this be the reason we take a step back.
 
#1,821
#1,821
I just know Pitt was really liked by the guys. Hopefully it works out like you say. I know it's just a part of the process, just sucks.
 
#1,822
#1,822
Hope this hire works out for us. But, I've already grown tired of reading about how he built programs up. Without reading a lot of article in depth, it looks like he took over some good programs from Kelly.
 
#1,823
#1,823
Slydell said:
Hope this hire works out for us. But, I've already grown tired of reading about how he built programs up. Without reading a lot of article in depth, it looks like he took over some good programs from Kelly.
Click to expand...

That's where I stand on it too.

I will say the cupboard is not bare on the hill right now though. No year "0" this time.
 
#1,824
#1,824
Agree on no year 0. That was bs the first time I heard it. If they want to do a year 0, then it should be written into the contract. We'll give you year 0 but there will be pay involved. We'll discuss pay and terms at the end of year 0. Sounds fair to me.
 
#1,825
#1,825
Slydell said:
Agree on no year 0. That was bs the first time I heard it. If they want to do a year 0, then it should be written into the contract. We'll give you year 0 but there will be pay involved. We'll discuss pay and terms at the end of year 0. Sounds fair to me.
Click to expand...

I could definitely live with a year 0 if the pay is based on the way year 0 plays out. Never would happen that way. But I could live with it.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top