D-Mo is going to be a star.

#9
#9
Dude is something. And he got lucky to be on a raiders team with (dare I say it) potential upside.
 
#13
#13
DjCrenshaw said:
I think I'll sulk some more.... atleast until UT does something to wash the taste of dirt out of their mouths
Click to expand...
You may be sulking for a while ... considering Hunter is lost for the year and the concept of "a running game" is foreign to this team...
 
#14
#14
ITSGR82BATNVOL said:
You may be sulking for a while ... considering Hunter is lost for the year and the concept of "a running game" is foreign to this team...
Click to expand...

Well listening to Dooley's post game made me feel better, but I will sulk on. This florida thing really pisses me off at this point.
 
#15
#15
DjCrenshaw said:
Well listening to Dooley's post game made me feel better, but I will sulk on. This florida thing really pisses me off at this point.
Click to expand...
I know how ya feel trust me. Fact is, once Hunter went down we had as good a chance of winning the power ball lottery as winning that game. We should be able to break the streak next year at home, unless we totally choke.
 
#17
#17
ITSGR82BATNVOL said:
If you're referring to Fla, get over it. We got our ass kicked by a superior team, again .
Click to expand...

It's a loss, but nowhere near an ass kicking. Refer to Bama game last year for ass kicking. 30 point and 250 yard gap between winner and loser. That's an asskicking.


10 point and 70 yard gap isnt' an ass kicking.
 
#18
#18
DC Vol said:
It's a loss, but nowhere near an ass kicking. Refer to Bama game last year for ass kicking. 30 point and 250 yard gap between winner and loser. That's an asskicking.


10 point and 70 yard gap isnt' an ass kicking.
Click to expand...

Game wasn't nearly as close as the final score indicated and anyone that knows FB knows it. If Fla doesn't settle for all those field goals, the score is much more one sided. Do you really think UT could have stopped Rainey on all those 4th downs, had Fla gone for it, instead of settling for 3? If so, you're very naive my friend.
 
#21
#21
ITSGR82BATNVOL said:
Do you really think UT could have stopped Rainey on all those 4th downs, had Fla gone for it, instead of settling for 3? If so, you're very naive my friend.
Click to expand...

Come on, man. Be negative all you want, but get your facts straight. You act like all of those 4th downs were 4th and 1. Those 4th down field goals weren't even close to first down yardage:
4th and 10
4th and 10
4th and 16
4th and 5

You think Rainey is going to get first downs on all of those?
What kind of coach would go for any thing over the 4th and 5 when they don't need it? If they would have gone for it, they would have come out with one of those first downs - maybe. The game was close because the defense kept UF out of the end zone more times than they didn't. That's not naivete.
 
#23
#23
karmazone said:
Come on, man. Be negative all you want, but get your facts straight. You act like all of those 4th downs were 4th and 1. Those 4th down field goals weren't even close to first down yardage:
4th and 10
4th and 10
4th and 16
4th and 5

You think Rainey is going to get first downs on all of those?
What kind of coach would go for any thing over the 4th and 5 when they don't need it? If they would have gone for it, they would have come out with one of those first downs - maybe. The game was close because the defense kept UF out of the end zone more times than they didn't. That's not naivete.
Click to expand...

Well-said.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top