37620VOL
Barely-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 7,808
- Likes
- 16,238
I don't understand the heat Currie is taking at this point.
If Currie does this correctly, then we should already have our future coach before pulling the trigger on the current coach. Suppose we already have an agreement with the future coach (because they are currently unattached) but the coach does not want to jump into this mess midseason. What is the benefit of firing CBJ now as opposed to the conclusion of the regular season?
There is no benefit. Recruits will bail either way, even more so if CBJ is fired.
"Go ahead and fire him, it can't get any worse," you say. Well, yes it can. CBJ is very hands-on the offense. The offense is very bad, but it could be worse. CBJ, perhaps intentionally, has made sure that there is no one below him on the offensive side that can immediately replace him.
If you ditch Jones, who runs the offense? Scott? I believe we've already determined that he's the problem, not the solution. Gillespie? He has his hands full with recruiting and does not have the experience nor does he want OC responsibilities. Canales? North Texas Canales?
No, just no.
So the best course of action for Currie is this:
1. Line up a fantastic hire -> Kelly, Miles, Mullen, Patterson, Gruden, Etc.
2. Keep CBJ until the fantastic hire is ready to take over.
3. Salvage the recruiting class as best we can.
4. Let the new hire consider retaining Gillespie/Shoop/Hoke but in no way hinder him hiring who he thinks he needs on his staff. No handcuffs.
For the above reasons, I am withholding judgment on Currie, and I do not understand why people are so upset with him when it is entirely possible that he is acting prudently. Now if he fails on attracting a fantastic hire or retains CBJ through 2018, by all means, bring out the pitchforks.
If Currie does this correctly, then we should already have our future coach before pulling the trigger on the current coach. Suppose we already have an agreement with the future coach (because they are currently unattached) but the coach does not want to jump into this mess midseason. What is the benefit of firing CBJ now as opposed to the conclusion of the regular season?
There is no benefit. Recruits will bail either way, even more so if CBJ is fired.
"Go ahead and fire him, it can't get any worse," you say. Well, yes it can. CBJ is very hands-on the offense. The offense is very bad, but it could be worse. CBJ, perhaps intentionally, has made sure that there is no one below him on the offensive side that can immediately replace him.
If you ditch Jones, who runs the offense? Scott? I believe we've already determined that he's the problem, not the solution. Gillespie? He has his hands full with recruiting and does not have the experience nor does he want OC responsibilities. Canales? North Texas Canales?
No, just no.
So the best course of action for Currie is this:
1. Line up a fantastic hire -> Kelly, Miles, Mullen, Patterson, Gruden, Etc.
2. Keep CBJ until the fantastic hire is ready to take over.
3. Salvage the recruiting class as best we can.
4. Let the new hire consider retaining Gillespie/Shoop/Hoke but in no way hinder him hiring who he thinks he needs on his staff. No handcuffs.
For the above reasons, I am withholding judgment on Currie, and I do not understand why people are so upset with him when it is entirely possible that he is acting prudently. Now if he fails on attracting a fantastic hire or retains CBJ through 2018, by all means, bring out the pitchforks.