Covid Fraud Thread

It seems that many are rethinking there positions on the covid vax.


Is that why the old thread is gone?
 
I'll keep my thoughts to myself on all of that. But as more information comes out on long term effects of the mRNA experiment, many were FORCED to take. We need a running thread, I guess this is now it. But there was alot of good info on that old vaccine thread people had posted, it's a shame it's gone as I would sometimes go back and refer to links to read again. Regardless where people stand on issue, it was valuable information. It's a topic that effects more people here then any other as everyone either has a direct tie in that they had to take it, or have friend and family who have. If you take down a thread just because some people troll it, that is a win for the trolls.
 
You see networks still running Covid ads and you kind of think it’s a joke because the con was up 2 years ago for dumb people and 5 years ago for non-imbeciles. I guess this thread shows that there are a few “night walkers” out there that are still bought in. Be careful because these people vote and we have to share the roads with them.

What exactly are you saying? That covid wasn't real? That the vax didn't save countless lives?

I can accept that people are unwilling to take a vaccine and have fears about potential side effects, but Covid existed and the vaccine made a huge problem into a small problem.
 
Another ignorant response. Dr. McCullough has been 100% consistent on everything he has said since 2020. He was one of the lead guys at Pfizer and quit because he knew the dangers. He has saved more lives than anyone will ever know by informing people on the dangers that were hidden (even my own Dr. agrees with this). He did this knowing that he was putting his own future at risk. I guess your wackadoodle is my hero whereas yours is probably a Leticia James type.

I think you got the wrong guy. Yeadon is the former Pfizer guy
 
What exactly are you saying? That covid wasn't real? That the vax didn't save countless lives?

I can accept that people are unwilling to take a vaccine and have fears about potential side effects, but Covid existed and the vaccine made a huge problem into a small problem.
Covid was real, it nearly killed me. THe Vax didn't save lives, it cost more lives and is likely still costing lives. You were less likely to survive COVID if you were triple vaxed then if you were not. Several reports and studies are now showing that. The shots weakened your immune system. Keep your head in the sands Huff you have thus far....
 
What exactly are you saying? That covid wasn't real? That the vax didn't save countless lives?

I can accept that people are unwilling to take a vaccine and have fears about potential side effects, but Covid existed and the vaccine made a huge problem into a small problem.
The strain evolving weakened Covid, not the vaccine which had little effect after initial strain. It had almost no effect on children and young adults. You’re pretty much hopeless if you‘re getting vaxed at this point. Same with masking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ttucke11
The strain evolving weakened Covid, not the vaccine which had little effect after initial strain. It had almost no effect on children and young adults. You’re pretty much hopeless if you‘re getting vaxed at this point. Same with masking.

This isn't a given. Viruses don't reliably do that, for example Alpha was the 2nd strain and was not weaker. You can't separate the vaccine from your analysis, because the vaccine came long before the "weaker strain" omicron. 11 months before, and we can see in the data that it was working before the supposed "weaker strain" hit.

Hospitaliziations for children ages 5-11 dropped by 2/3, so I'd say that's making a pretty big difference.


I don't think people need to get the vaccine now. Definitely not kids.
 
My boss has been having all kinds of health problems, which included blood clotting. I was talking to him about it, and how confused the doctors are....

I said to him, "I know what everybody says to you."

He says, "What?"

I say, "They tell you it's because you were vaccinated."

He says, "Yeah, they all say that. I wasn't vaccinated but I got covid really bad, and that actually makes you more susceptible to blood clots."

And that's the world we live in. People just want to blame the vaccine with no evidence other than a symptom.
 
This isn't a given. Viruses don't reliably do that, for example Alpha was the 2nd strain and was not weaker. You can't separate the vaccine from your analysis, because the vaccine came long before the "weaker strain" omicron. 11 months before, and we can see in the data that it was working before the supposed "weaker strain" hit.

Hospitaliziations for children ages 5-11 dropped by 2/3, so I'd say that's making a pretty big difference.


I don't think people need to get the vaccine now. Definitely not kids.
Covid did weaken though and that’s the salient factor. A was bad, D was bad and vacine resistant and omicron noticeably weaker. As far as the New England Journal of Medicine, I don’t believe anything they say anymore. The medical establishment starting with the CDC lost all credibility imo. I don’t care what their studies come up with.
 
Covid did weaken though and that’s the salient factor. A was bad, D was bad and vacine resistant and omicron noticeably weaker. As far as the New England Journal of Medicine, I don’t believe anything they say anymore. The medical establishment starting with the CDC lost all credibility imo. I don’t care what their studies come up with.

Well, if you dismiss the entire medical establishment then there is no conversation to be had.
 
Goodness gracious ...

From the article:

On Tuesday, the nation’s largest pediatrics association revealed that it is bucking guidance from Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by recommending Covid shots for infants and young children. The advisement was included in the AAP’s newly released immunization schedule for all children under the age of 18.

“Infants and children 6 through 23 months of age are at the highest risk for severe COVID-19,” the APP claimed in its press release. “Given this, the AAP recommends a COVID-19 vaccine for all children ages 6 through 23 months old to help protect against serious illness. Children younger than 2 years old are especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and should be prioritized for vaccination unless they have a known allergy to the vaccine or its ingredients.”


 
Probably not. Without checking though, I wonder what the NEJM’s stance on masking and spacing were. In the US it was 6 ft. In Europe it was 1.5 meters. Who’s right? So many choices, so many sciences.

Science is coming up with a hypothesis and then testing the hypothesis. Mistaken theories are almost always part of the process. Science is not omniscience regarding novel viruses.

Our leadership entirely failed us with terrible communication, and without that I think all this trust that was lost would be relegated to a much smaller, traditionally conspiratorial group. They thought we needed to be shown confidence and strength, rather than treating us like adults who could handle nuanced convo (and they are right that a lot of us can't).
 
Science is coming up with a hypothesis and then testing the hypothesis. Mistaken theories are almost always part of the process. Science is not omniscience regarding novel viruses.

Our leadership entirely failed us with terrible communication, and without that I think all this trust that was lost would be relegated to a much smaller, traditionally conspiratorial group. They thought we needed to be shown confidence and strength, rather than treating us like adults who could handle nuanced convo (and they are right that a lot of us can't).
They failed by locking us in our homes, closing churches, schools, etc. Not because of “bad communication”. My belief is that we’re a nation that’s mostly run by psychopaths that will game any situation for power and money. Covid was just an opportunity to do that. If that makes me a conspiracist, so be it.
 
Last edited:
Probably not. Without checking though, I wonder what the NEJM’s stance on masking and spacing were. In the US it was 6 ft. In Europe it was 1.5 meters. Who’s right? So many choices, so many sciences.
They admitted 6 ft was just a made up number. Anyone who believes the official COVID story and propaganda that followed should probably say hi to the tooth fairy for the rest of us.
 
Goodness gracious ...

From the article:

On Tuesday, the nation’s largest pediatrics association revealed that it is bucking guidance from Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by recommending Covid shots for infants and young children. The advisement was included in the AAP’s newly released immunization schedule for all children under the age of 18.

“Infants and children 6 through 23 months of age are at the highest risk for severe COVID-19,” the APP claimed in its press release. “Given this, the AAP recommends a COVID-19 vaccine for all children ages 6 through 23 months old to help protect against serious illness. Children younger than 2 years old are especially vulnerable to severe COVID-19 and should be prioritized for vaccination unless they have a known allergy to the vaccine or its ingredients.”


Guarantee they get funding from big pharma
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO
I think you got the wrong guy. Yeadon is the former Pfizer guy
Nope! Right guy. Look at his background. Yeadon is good as well. I've read many of his articles and he, Malone and McCollough are pretty much in lock step with the whole mRNA development. All three took huge risks by putting the truth out there.
 
Nope! Right guy. Look at his background. Yeadon is good as well. I've read many of his articles and he, Malone and McCollough are pretty much in lock step with the whole mRNA development. All three took huge risks by putting the truth out there.

Link?

Crazy that "Pfizer" is not mentioned on his Wiki page if he worked for Pfizer and it's a key part of his origin story. All the years in his professional career are accounted for.

 
Link?

Crazy that "Pfizer" is not mentioned on his Wiki page if he worked for Pfizer and it's a key part of his origin story. All the years in his professional career are accounted for.

You may be correct on McCullough though I suggest you not use wikipedia. They are a soviet style record keeper that can be accessed by almost anyone who wants to sabotage people. Here's one of there lines in the opening paragraph describing McCullough.
" McCullough has promoted misinformation and conspiracy theories about COVID-19, its treatments, and mRNA vaccines"
Bet you can never guess who they support.
 
You may be correct on McCullough though I suggest you not use wikipedia. They are a soviet style record keeper that can be accessed by almost anyone who wants to sabotage people. Here's one of there lines in the opening paragraph describing McCullough.
" McCullough has promoted misinformation and conspiracy theories about COVID-19, its treatments, and mRNA vaccines"
Bet you can never guess who they support.

Well, I definitely trust it more than I trust you, since you're 0 for 2 on the same fact.

The idea that you wouldn't use wikipedia at all is crazy. It's not 100%, but no source is. You have powers of discernment, right?
 
Well, I definitely trust it more than I trust you, since you're 0 for 2 on the same fact.

The idea that you wouldn't use wikipedia at all is crazy. It's not 100%, but no source is. You have powers of discernment, right?
Of course I do. That's why I avoid Wiki. 0 for2? what was the second one?
 
Advertisement

Back
Top