Comey Indicted

#51
#51
I would like to know why the first prosecutor didn’t take it up.


He has said he doesnt think he could prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Its a quirk of the process. To get an indictment you need to only prove probable cause. But that is done without the defense putting on a case or explaining why there isn't a crime.

To convict, he has to prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

So, despite the lower standard of proof, an ethical prosecutor seeks an indictment only when he believes he can prove it at the end beyond a reasonable doubt.
 
#59
#59
He has said he doesnt think he could prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Its a quirk of the process. To get an indictment you need to only prove probable cause. But that is done without the defense putting on a case or explaining why there isn't a crime.

To convict, he has to prove a crime beyond a reasonable doubt.

So, despite the lower standard of proof, an ethical prosecutor seeks an indictment only when he believes he can prove it at the end beyond a reasonable doubt.
This, again, is inaccurate.
Doing this essentially asks the prosecutor to substitute his judgment for that of the jury.

Plenty of cases involve prosecution based on probable cause, but where a prosecutor does not know if he can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. That is what the jury is for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#60
#60
This, again, is inaccurate.
Doing this essentially asks the prosecutor to substitute his judgment for that of the jury.

Plenty of cases involve prosecution based on probable cause, but where a prosecutor does not know if he can prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. That is what the jury is for.


You don’t know what you are talking about.
 
#64
#64
The public trail that this is political is undeniable. I mean, the ASA who had the case -- a Trump supporter - quit saying that he would not be complicit in this.

Trump responded by saying he fired the guy because he would not indict Comey, then Trump installed a political operative who got the indictment in days.

US attorneys represent the US, not Trump. That Trump by his own words put someone in there just to retaliate against Comey is a huge problem. Or should be for anyone with an ounce of integrity.

This is going to get really ugly really fast. And the Supreme Court's credibility will be on the line shortly.
As if Trump wasn’t politically prosecuted. Comey is a bitch
 
#65
#65
1758854837672.png
Investigative Journalist Richard Esposito and James Comey, former FBI Director, speak at the Barnes & Noble Upper West Side on May 19, 2025 in New York City.

On Thursday, James Comey became the first former Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to be indicted for a federal crime.

For some, the two-count indictment is a long-overdue accountability for a man who pushed through the now-debunked Russian collusion investigation.

For others, it is another abuse on President Donald Trump’s revenge tour.

However, Comey is hardly the pristine model of “ethical leadership” that he described in his book. Putting aside his critical role in the Russian collusion investigation, Comey tossed aside even the pretense of ethics after Trump fired him.

The Inspector General, Michael Horowitz, issued a scathing report that found Comey was a leaker and had violated FBI policy in his handling of FBI memos.

On his way out of the Bureau, Horowitz wrote, Comey improperly removed FBI materials, including those containing the “code name and true identity” of a sensitive source.

While he did not find that he disclosed the classified information, Horowitz found that Comey took “the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive investigative information, obtained during the course of FBI employment, in order to achieve a personally desired outcome.”
He further added that Comey “set a dangerous example for the over 35,000 current FBI employees — and the many thousands of more former FBI employees — who similarly have access to or knowledge of non-public information.”

Comey later admitted that he asked his friend, Columbia Law Professor Daniel Richman, to leak information from the documents to the New York Times.

Comey’s close associate, former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, stated that Comey instructed him to leak information to the media. Comey denied that repeatedly under oath.

James Baker, FBI general counsel and a close adviser to Comey, also told investigators that he was “under the belief” that he was “ultimately instructed and authorized to [provide information to the Times] by then FBI Director James Comey.”

 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
#67
#67
The public trail that this is political is undeniable. I mean, the ASA who had the case -- a Trump supporter - quit saying that he would not be complicit in this.

Trump responded by saying he fired the guy because he would not indict Comey, then Trump installed a political operative who got the indictment in days.

US attorneys represent the US, not Trump. That Trump by his own words put someone in there just to retaliate against Comey is a huge problem. Or should be for anyone with an ounce of integrity.

This is going to get really ugly really fast. And the Supreme Court's credibility will be on the line shortly.
1758856893422.gif
 
#70
#70
How doooo!
Welcome to my shop
Let me cut your mop
Let me shave your crop
Daintedly, daintedly

Hey, yoooou!
Don't look so perplexed
Why must you be vexed?
Can't you see you're next?
Yes, you're next
You're so next


How about a nice close shave?
Teach your whiskers to behave
Lots of lather, lots of soap
Please hold still, don't be a dope
Now we're ready for the scrapin'
There's no use to try еscapin'
Yell and scream and rant and rave
Thеre's no use, you need a shaaave!


1758880845310.png


 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#73
#73
the same was true for Bragg, James and Willis but where was the outrage about these clearly political prosecutions. not only was there none; they were celebrated by the very people who will now cry foul about Comey.

would be nice if it didn't happen ever but there's a long trail of these tools being used against Trump and his associates so why would anyone be surprised what goes around comes around
This right here. ^^^^

You screw with the bull, you get the horn. The dems went very hard after Trump, gambling that he or someone loyal to him would never see power again. Bad move. They went after a guy with power, influence......who's also a billionaire....with very weak charges, just praying one of the more serious ones would stick. What the hell were they thinking? Answer: They weren't thinking. They were like someone out partying in a club and doing shots till 3AM, all while having to do a presentation the next morning, thinking they could handle the hangover. They were like the idiotic Palestinians that decided to attack Israel on October 7th and now sit in ashes. Dumb, real dumb.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#75
#75
How, in your view, was it weaponized in 2016?
The answer is pretty obvious. More than all the Flynn stuff and Russia-gate though, Comey has always played the role of Washington lawyer to an T. Heck, he even did it to Hillary when he handed Democrats the outcome they wanted in her email investigation… then covered his ass by calling her out a week before the election.

In technical terms - dude is just greasy.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top