VolArmy74
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2014
- Messages
- 9,805
- Likes
- 17,422
I see your point to certain extent...but I really hope that by your last comment, you're not saying that Martin is a better Coach than Pearl. Martin has his qualities, seems to be a good recruiter and all around likable guy, but in game coaching is not his strong point and neither is being a motivator...the team seems to play hard when they want to and when they do, they are Really Really good and hard to beat.
Just addressing the logic that when one guy wins its because he's a great coach but when the other guy wins he's still a lousy coach. If we're just talking best strategist, Don DeVoe is easily the best we ever had, and Ray Mears leaves Pearl in the dust as well. I loved the DeVoe teams, simply because DeVoe himself gave us hope every time out. But coaching a college basketball team is more than that. Success is measured by wins. If the argument is just that Cuonzo has not yet matched Bruce's best years, then okay; I'll agree to that. If we're just saying Cuonzo makes some mysterious in-game coaching decisions, I'll agree to that, but I'll add, so did Pearl.
Coaching in college is teaching, game planning and recruiting. Bruce Pearl did all of those together better than anyone else here has before.
DeVoe wasn't a good recruiter, and I'd say he wasn't quite Pearl in the teaching department either. Mears was a great recruiter, but he actually underachieved. Not winning a national championship with Ernie and Bernie was underachieving really. Not advancing beyond the first round with those guys is ridiculous.
Pearl didn't just win at the highest level we've ever saw here, he did it at every level he coached at for 20 years. And I'd wager a good amount he'll do it at his next stop, wherever that place may be.
Pearl is 462-183 for a 72% career winning percentage. He's coached 10 seasons in Div 1 and made 8 NCAA tournaments, 4 of the 8 he went to the sweet 16 or beyond.
He's the best we've ever had and holds most of our great coaching records like most NCAA wins, furthest advancement in the NCAA, only #1 ranking, first SEC championship in 40 years.
Pearl is better than DeVoe ever was, he's better than Mears ever was. And that's not a slam against them, Pearl was just that good.
Coaching in college is teaching, game planning and recruiting. Bruce Pearl did all of those together better than anyone else here has before.
DeVoe wasn't a good recruiter, and I'd say he wasn't quite Pearl in the teaching department either. Mears was a great recruiter, but he actually underachieved. Not winning a national championship with Ernie and Bernie was underachieving really. Not advancing beyond the first round with those guys is ridiculous.
Pearl didn't just win at the highest level we've ever saw here, he did it at every level he coached at for 20 years. And I'd wager a good amount he'll do it at his next stop, wherever that place may be.
Pearl is 462-183 for a 72% career winning percentage. He's coached 10 seasons in Div 1 and made 8 NCAA tournaments, 4 of the 8 he went to the sweet 16 or beyond.
He's the best we've ever had and holds most of our great coaching records like most NCAA wins, furthest advancement in the NCAA, only #1 ranking, first SEC championship in 40 years.
Pearl is better than DeVoe ever was, he's better than Mears ever was. And that's not a slam against them, Pearl was just that good.
You have said this before but UT won titles in 72,77,82 and 2000. At least accord to UT's own web site.
UTSPORTS.COM - University of Tennessee Athletics - Fans
If you're going to say Mears underachieved by not winning an NC with Ernie and Bernie, then Pearl's best team was an underachiever as well.
Ernie and Bernie were multi-year First team All-American's. Bernard is the best player in SEC history. Mike Jackson was pretty great himself and Reggie Johnson was no slouch. The NCAA loss to VMI in 1976 may be the worst in program history for what it represented. Ernie and Bernard averaged 25 a game each that season, and a combined 20 rebounds. Mike Jackson averaged 16 a game himself. The loss to Syracuse the next year was just as bad, after they beat us, Charlotte beat them 81-59 in the next round.
Pearl never had a talent like Ernie or Bernard, let alone both at the same time but was a bucket away from the Final Four.
Ernie and Bernie were multi-year First team All-American's. Bernard is the best player in SEC history. Mike Jackson was pretty great himself and Reggie Johnson was no slouch. The NCAA loss to VMI in 1976 may be the worst in program history for what it represented. Ernie and Bernard averaged 25 a game each that season, and a combined 20 rebounds. Mike Jackson averaged 16 a game himself. The loss to Syracuse the next year was just as bad, after they beat us, Charlotte beat them 81-59 in the next round.
Pearl never had a talent like Ernie or Bernard, let alone both at the same time but was a bucket away from the Final Four.
Coaching in college is teaching, game planning and recruiting. Bruce Pearl did all of those together better than anyone else here has before.
DeVoe wasn't a good recruiter, and I'd say he wasn't quite Pearl in the teaching department either. Mears was a great recruiter, but he actually underachieved. Not winning a national championship with Ernie and Bernie was underachieving really. Not advancing beyond the first round with those guys is ridiculous.
Pearl didn't just win at the highest level we've ever saw here, he did it at every level he coached at for 20 years. And I'd wager a good amount he'll do it at his next stop, wherever that place may be.
Pearl is 462-183 for a 72% career winning percentage. He's coached 10 seasons in Div 1 and made 8 NCAA tournaments, 4 of the 8 he went to the sweet 16 or beyond.
He's the best we've ever had and holds most of our great coaching records like most NCAA wins, furthest advancement in the NCAA, only #1 ranking, first SEC championship in 40 years.
Pearl is better than DeVoe ever was, he's better than Mears ever was. And that's not a slam against them, Pearl was just that good.