salutethehill
by hatchet, axe, and saw
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2006
- Messages
- 9,223
- Likes
- 5,001
If you honestly think UT is a better job than Michigan you need to have your head checked......they have more tradition....the most wins in college football....more national titles....more Heisman's(considered we have NONE)
That being said, I agree that Oregon should not be ahead of us
If you honestly think UT is a better job than Michigan you need to have your head checked......they have more tradition....the most wins in college football....more national titles....more Heisman's(considered we have NONE)
That being said, I agree that Oregon should not be ahead of us
How old are you? I'm a couple years older than most recruits, and I know a few from high school, and I've heard no mention of shoes coming into their decision.
No link, read this in the Athlon Sports 2010 NCAA football preview magazine. UT is ranked in the top 25 of something.
Athlon Sports publishing ranks the University of Tennessee as #16 on its list of best coaching jobs.
Pros: large crowd/stadium and rich history
Cons: have to recruit outside of state because lack of bcs talent
Who you're recruiting agaisnt doesn't factor into how good of a job it is.....you need a better arguement than that
Yeah. Obviously Tennessee's history absolutely annihilates Oregon's, but we're the program on the rise right now.
I think it is probably better to think about the jobs in tiers, anyway. USC, Texas, Florida, ND, and Miami are premier jobs. There are a handful of SEC schools, a few of the Big 10, and probably Nebraska and Oregon in a solid grouping below that. OSU, Oklahoma, and FSU are somewhere in between.
It isn't as pretty on paper, but I'm not sure it makes a hell of a lot of difference where you rank within a particular grouping.