1. The defense didn't "wear down" against Alabama. They gave up 27 straight points in the first quarter+. Stop with that tired excuse.
2. Florida has one of the best defenses in the SEC? Seriously? Mizzou and Kentucky laugh at that. Only Tennessee made them look like one of the best defenses in the SEC.
http://www.nonstick.com/sounds/Yosemite_Sam/ltys_003.mp3I will agree that isnt always true, however mullen did make his biggest jump from year 1 to year 2.
Clay Travis was on the sports animal last hour and said that successful coaches typically make a huge leap from year 1 to year 2. He then went on to say that if Butch Jones does not win 3 out of the last 4 games this season he might not be the answer. Do you agree?
100% with you on point #1.
However, Florida has the #3 defense in the SEC behind OleMiss and Alabama and they're #12 nationally.....they have a very good defense. I'll give you that Kentucky put up 30 pts on them (although they only allowed 81 yds rushing, 2.5 ypc,). Also, Missouri only had 7 first downs and 119 total yds in a 42-13 win. They didn't do much of anything vs Florida's defense, did all their damage with special teams and defensive tds.
I did not bring spurrier up, someone else did about how long it took him to start winning at USCe. I pointed out that he already had a proven track record.
Also, since you want to use 1 game to point to Jones' coaching, I will remind you of Dooley running his "championship" team out of the stadium.
Spurrier won the ACC title in year 3 and went 7-3-1 his second year. I would say Spurriers schedule was easier, but when do you expect that the rest of the SEC will come down to Jones' level, genius?
So, Jones is in year 1.5, has to play several top 15 (3 Top 4) teams with no upperclassmen, a bunch of freshmen and you expect an SEC title, because Spurrier did it at Duke three decades ago????
And I'm the genius? OK. I actually expected some intelligent conversation, guess I was wrong. Good day!:hi:
http://www.nonstick.com/sounds/Yosemite_Sam/ltys_003.mp3
And I was gone say Clay Travis is a nincompoop.
http://www.nonstick.com/sounds/Bugs_Bunny/ltbb_162.mp3![]()
Let me spell it out for you. Spurrier had a proven track record before he started coaching USCe both with a program that has never won, and in the SEC with Florida. He was a proven winner of beating good teams, so when he took over USCe, it makes sense to be patient with him. I have said nothing about the expectations for Jones this year or next. I have only pointed out that Jones' previous record is very suspect and his coaching so far at UT is too. The odds are he is not going to learn on the job in the SEC, but you guys can keep hoping. I sure hope he does, and the USCe win last year was a positive, but they are offset by Vandy and Florida last year, and Florida this year. His track record is very poor against good teams, and I am not satisfied with being better than Dooley, moral victories, not quitting, and slogans.
This is a valid argument and I do agree spurrier was more accomplished based on his UF experience. However, I'm not sold on the duke accomplishments. The acc was garbage in the late 80s. The year he got a share of the acc championship they went 8-4 with losses to UT, USCe, NC state (who lost 5 of their last 6), and tx tech in a bowl game. The only big win that year was against Clemson.
I thought they were paying him 3 million a year to win. You are not going to out talent the top teams in the SEC, so you are going to have to out coach them from time to time, or you will just keep getting moral victories, and excuses like the team didn't quit, etc.
The hope of the Jones' lovers is that he beats all the odds and learns how to win in the toughest conference and with usually a top 5 toughest schedule, with a total of 3 wins ever in his entire career on the road against teams above .500. All 3 of those teams were 7 and 6. I do not like those odds.
Please don't let win/loss records fool you. If that was the case, teams like Utah State would be likely losses for Jones every year, right? Looking only at wins loss records is fools gold and isn't as strongly related to other wins and losses as other variables. Recruited talent being the biggest single factor in predicting wins and losses.