Clay Travis: "Good news for Tennessee fans next week"

#1

VOL_Lyfe

Air Assault
Joined
Oct 15, 2012
Messages
12,024
Likes
15,748
#1
“Realistic expectations for Tennessee football hire?”

Not surprisingly, I’ve gotten a ton of questions all week about the Tennessee football hire.
Let’s begin here with something that will blow the media’s minds. It’s possible for Jeremy Pruitt to have been a bad hire and for Greg Schiano to have been a bad hire too. In other words, one hire isn’t necessarily connected to the other.

If you told me today that Tennessee was hiring Greg Schiano to replace Jeremy Pruitt, I would still be opposed to it, and I suspect the majority of Tennessee fans would too. I still believe he would have been a bad hire for Tennessee.

And while there has been a ton of discussion about the Pruitt firing, I think it was the right decision, whether he’d violated NCAA rules or not. By year three, you know whether a coach is going to work out. Pruitt wasn’t going to work out. He was a poor hire — the Kentucky and Arkansas performances alone demonstrated that — and I was afraid Tennessee was going to give him a fourth year and leave everyone hanging in the breeze.

With the firing out of the way — potentially with no buyouts in play at all — as I’ve been saying all week, I think Tennessee will hire its most accomplished head coach since Johnny Majors. That is to say, the number of proven and high quality coaches who are interested in this job has blown me away. I’m not reacting to any media reports on this coaching interest. I’m talking about coaches who have directly reached out to me to talk about the Tennessee job and express interest in it.

That’s why I haven’t publicly endorsed any Tennessee coaching candidate. There are several of those coaches who have reached out to me that I’d be ecstatic if Tennessee hired. It’s not my decision whom to hire, but I think Tennessee fans are going to be happy with the end result, solely based on the number of quality candidates out there interested in the job.

Indeed, I think this is the best bunch of potential coaches Tennessee has had interested in the job since Phil Fulmer was fired back in 2008. I know the doom and gloomers in national media didn’t believe it, but I told you before the Danny White AD hire was announced that Tennessee was going to be in a good spot with this hire. Now after the Danny White hire, which impressed everyone, I feel even better about the options out there.

That’s especially the case because it appears Tennessee is finally committed to deploying the Travis dump truck of cash theory and finally paying big money to accomplished coaching talents, as opposed to hiring lesser known candidates, paying them less, and hoping they work out.

Which is why I’m telling you that I expect Tennessee to hire its most accomplished head coach since Johnny Majors.

Remember, since Majors, who had won a national championship at Pittsburgh, Tennessee has hired: Phil Fulmer, the then-Vol offensive coordinator who had never been a head coach before; Lane Kiffin, who had been a head coach of the Oakland Raiders for just over a year and gotten fired there; Derek Dooley, who was coming off a 4-8 season as a head coach at Louisiana Tech; Butch Jones, who honestly, was the most accomplished head coach since Majors hired at Tennessee and Jeremy Pruitt, who had never been a head coach before.

When Tennessee announces their next coach, which I think will happen next week, I think all the doom and gloomers in the media are going to flip their takes and be praising Tennessee for making a great football hire and pairing him with a great AD.

And, by the way, I love the quiet way Tennessee conducted its AD search. No real leaks, no wild rumors, just an orderly process that led to a very solid hire. So far, the same thing has been true of the head coach search as well.

Which is why I think good news is coming for Tennessee fans early next week.

All That and a Bag of Mail – OutKick
 
#6
#6
Knock him all you want but Clay is dead on with the Schiano comments.

We are probably staring at similar records right now whether it was Schiano or Pruitt in charge.

Take away Ray Rice and Schianos record gets even worse.

Schiano, if hired, would have been an improvement over Pruitt. Pruitt was just that bad. You would have actually saw prepared teams, decent lines, halftime adjustments, and teams not quitting. I'm not saying that he would have done great but I would suspect the following:

Y1: 7-6 (Schiano) vs 5-7
Y2: 9-4 (Schiano) vs 8-5
Y3: 6-4 (Schiano) vs 3-7

Through 3 years that's 22-14 vs 16-19
 
#7
#7
Schiano, if hired, would have been an improvement over Pruitt. Pruitt was just that bad. You would have actually saw prepared teams, decent lines, halftime adjustments, and teams not quitting. I'm not saying that he would have done great but I would suspect the following:

Y1: 7-6 (Schiano) vs 5-7
Y2: 9-4 (Schiano) vs 8-5
Y3: 6-4 (Schiano) vs 3-7

Through 3 years that's 22-14 vs 16-19
the real question is...would Schiano had rolled with JG? Could he have gotten a competent QB? If he played JG too its probably a worse record because I doubt he recruits as well.
 
#8
#8
Schiano, if hired, would have been an improvement over Pruitt. Pruitt was just that bad. You would have actually saw prepared teams, decent lines, halftime adjustments, and teams not quitting. I'm not saying that he would have done great but I would suspect the following:

Y1: 7-6 (Schiano) vs 5-7
Y2: 9-4 (Schiano) vs 8-5
Y3: 6-4 (Schiano) vs 3-7

Through 3 years that's 22-14 vs 16-19

Yeah....thats why I qualified my comment saying records would be similar.

I'll give Schiano credit for being better than Pruitt too.

But I think we are in about the same boat wondering whether he is the right guy to elevate the program or not. Probably not sweating NCAA sanctions over McDonald's bags though.

These media folk exoriating the Vols again this week over the Schiano deal are about insufferable though.

They act like the fans told Saban to go take a hike when bringing Schiano up.
 
#9
#9
Schiano, if hired, would have been an improvement over Pruitt. Pruitt was just that bad. You would have actually saw prepared teams, decent lines, halftime adjustments, and teams not quitting. I'm not saying that he would have done great but I would suspect the following:

Y1: 7-6 (Schiano) vs 5-7
Y2: 9-4 (Schiano) vs 8-5
Y3: 6-4 (Schiano) vs 3-7

Through 3 years that's 22-14 vs 16-19
I think 7-6 and especially 6-4 are real generous assumptions for Schiano. He may have had a better year 2 and 3 record but not by that much in year 3. Would not want him either way, guy is a jerk and potentially worse
 
#10
#10
Schiano, if hired, would have been an improvement over Pruitt. Pruitt was just that bad. You would have actually saw prepared teams, decent lines, halftime adjustments, and teams not quitting. I'm not saying that he would have done great but I would suspect the following:

Y1: 7-6 (Schiano) vs 5-7
Y2: 9-4 (Schiano) vs 8-5
Y3: 6-4 (Schiano) vs 3-7

Through 3 years that's 22-14 vs 16-19
tumblr_inline_p7qbibfv4C1qm02yb_500.gifv
 
#11
#11
the real question is...would Schiano had rolled with JG? Could he have gotten a competent QB? If he played JG too its probably a worse record because I doubt he recruits as well.

I would hope Schiano would have had enough sense to find another QB.

But I honestly couldn't tell you a single QB who played under Schiano either off hand.

Agree that he wouldn't have recruited as well here and his personality could have rubbed people wrong even worse than Pruitt.
 
#15
#15
I think 7-6 and especially 6-4 are real generous assumptions for Schiano. He may have had a better year 2 and 3 record but not by that much in year 3. Would not want him either way, guy is a jerk and potentially worse

I know complimenting Schiano is a No-No on VN but here's my thought process:

Y1: Schiano's teams would have won one of the games that Pruitt's team quit (Vandy or Mizzou) then beat some overmatched Big 10 team in a bowl

Y2: Schiano's team would have beat GSU

Y3: Schiano's team would have beat UK (at home), Arky, and I got to 6-4 by having them beat Auburn


Pruitt's ineptitude as a HC was staggering. Schiano was, currently is, and will be a better HC than Jeremy Pruitt. Schiano won as many games as Pruitt this year (in fewer games) at that sh-tshow Rutgers.
 
#16
#16
Schiano, if hired, would have been an improvement over Pruitt. Pruitt was just that bad. You would have actually saw prepared teams, decent lines, halftime adjustments, and teams not quitting. I'm not saying that he would have done great but I would suspect the following:

Y1: 7-6 (Schiano) vs 5-7
Y2: 9-4 (Schiano) vs 8-5
Y3: 6-4 (Schiano) vs 3-7

Through 3 years that's 22-14 vs 16-19

Dear Lord, give it a rest.

Who cares? Rutgers hasn’t gotten this much ink since beating Princeton in the 19th Century. 🤮
 
#18
#18
I know complimenting Schiano is a No-No on VN but here's my thought process:

Y1: Schiano's teams would have won one of the games that Pruitt's team quit (Vandy or Mizzou) then beat some overmatched Big 10 team in a bowl

Y2: Schiano's team would have beat GSU

Y3: Schiano's team would have beat UK (at home), Arky, and I got to 6-4 by having them beat Auburn


Pruitt's ineptitude as a HC was staggering. Schiano was, currently is, and will be a better HC than Jeremy Pruitt.
No way he beats Mizzou year 1, maybe Vandy but that's assuming he also beats Auburn on the road and a top 12 Kentucky team at home

Year 2, yeah I could see nine wins, but had he won 8 in the regular season he might've had a much tougher bowl opponent

Again I could see him winning one more, three is a stretch. Arkansas perhaps
 
#19
#19
I would hope Schiano would have had enough sense to find another QB.

But I honestly couldn't tell you a single QB who played under Schiano either off hand.

Agree that he wouldn't have recruited as well here and his personality could have rubbed people wrong even worse than Pruitt.
We don't like Yankees down here.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top