Chris Kyle: American hero or

There are like 3 posters in the politics forum who turn every thread into a s*** show. It's hard to have good conversations. I don't know if I didn't notice them when Mav was around, or if they got worse, but damn something needs to change.

Thread terrorism. Get rid of one and three more spring up in his place.

Obama should have addressed this in the SOTU imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
There are like 3 posters in the politics forum who turn every thread into a s*** show. It's hard to have good conversations. I don't know if I didn't notice them when Mav was around, or if they got worse, but damn something needs to change.

I figure you're referring to me as one, but I think your real issue is with those that disagree with you and think most of your opinions are complete BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I figure you're referring to me as one, but I think your real issue is with those that disagree with you and think most of your opinions are complete BS.

Huff doesn't mind when people disagree. He'd be bored stiff without arguing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
This thread certainly turned into a Royal Rumble of sorts. Everyone having a go at everyone.

I feel like I'm usually good at letting the snarky quips roll off my back (I would be a terrible sport if I didn't, seeing as I throw a few out from time to time), but when I'm hounded about Donnie Tyndal's courtside attire in a politics forum, I draw a line in the sand.
 
Huff doesn't mind when people disagree. He'd be bored stiff without arguing.

It's so boring when everybody agrees. It's so useless when disagreements devolve into pissing matches. I love it when people argue the things I say. People tend to argue points nobody made, while attributing these false arguments to people they disagree with...and of course the usual name-calling, which is always the best place to take an intellectual discussion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
It's so boring when everybody agrees. It's so useless when disagreements devolve into pissing matches. I love it when people argue the things I say. People tend to argue points nobody made, while attributing these false arguments to people they disagree with...and of course the usual name-calling, which is always the best place to take an intellectual discussion.

I just wonder how much of it is done intentionally with the goal to disrupt, and how much of it is the poster being incapable of understanding what is being argued, and how to contribute.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I feel like I'm usually good at letting the snarky quips roll off my back (I would be a terrible sport if I didn't, seeing as I throw a few out from time to time), but when I'm hounded about Donnie Tyndal's courtside attire in a politics forum, I draw a line in the sand.

It was a joke there bud. Deal with it, or hope you are right and the government turns our military on us to put us out of our misery.

Any "brown people" around the area where you are drawing that line in the sand?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
It was a joke there bud. Deal with it, or hope you are right and the government turns our military on us to put us out of our misery.

Any "brown people" around the area where you are drawing that line in the sand?

Wtf is with the brown obsession. Get the fawk over it you butthurt infant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
I don't think it is wise to teach young Americans that all you need to do to gain fame, adoration, and notoriety from an entire nation of your peers is to go to the desert and shoot brown people with a sniper rifle. What he did may have been necessary from a tactical standpoint at the time. Taking lives, even ones that our country deems as evil, should never be done with a flippant or callous attitude. It is still a human person with skin and bones.

I only type what I read
 
I only type what I read

No. So far you've ignored every part of anything I've typed except for one tiny piece that was typed several pages ago and have used that as a rallying cry every time you want to contribute, but don't have anything meaningful to say. Keep obsessing, though, if it makes you feel like you are part of the conversation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
No. So far you've ignored every part of anything I've typed except for one tiny piece that was typed several pages ago and have used that as a rallying cry every time you want to contribute, but don't have anything meaningful to say. Keep obsessing, though, if it makes you feel like you are part of the conversation.

Because I'm not on your side of the argument I have nothing meaningful to say?

Carry on then, you and your buddies can sit around here and decide when the government is going to finally take us out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Because I'm not on your side of the argument I have nothing meaningful to say?

Carry on then, you and your buddies can sit around here and decide when the government is going to finally take us out.

When you get frustrated and start obsessing about brown people and Donnie's Courtside appearance, I'd say you are pretty much out of meaningful things to say. And if you'll notice throughout the thread, I'm very reasonable to differing opinions that are presented without snarky douchebagery attached.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Dont act like you made a single comment about the "brown people" thing. Don't get all upset because it was turned back on you. When I made the Tyndall comment the conversation had taken a severe change of course you must admit. It was merely a joke and I only kept it going to ruffle your feathers ( which clearly worked by the way). I apologize if you misinterpreted my post.

When you get frustrated and start obsessing about brown people and Donnie's Courtside appearance, I'd say you are pretty much out of meaningful things to say. And if you'll notice throughout the thread, I'm very reasonable to differing opinions that are presented without snarky douchebagery attached.

Originally Posted by*SamRebel35:
If I'm being forced to argue without consideration of gray area, then yes. He went to the desert to kill brown people that our government gave him license to kill.

I freely acknowledge that there is a ton of gray area, but most in the "hero" camp are treating this like an open and shut case. No questions asked. In their black and white minds, he is a hero. I'm just tapping the breaks and trying to think my way through this. I have a hard time calling him a hero for the reasons I mentioned. That doesn't mean I think he is a murderous psychopath either, just not a hero.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by*SamRebel35:
If I'm being forced to argue without consideration of gray area, then yes. He went to the desert to kill brown people that our government gave him license to kill.*

Dont act like you made a single comment about the "brown people" thing. Don't get all upset because it was turned back on you. When I made the Tyndall comment the conversation had taken a severe change of course you must admit. It was merely a joke and I only kept it going to ruffle your feathers ( which clearly worked by the way). I apologize if you misinterpreted my post

I freely acknowledge that there is a ton of gray area, but most in the "hero" camp are treating this like an open and shut case. No questions asked. In their black and white minds, he is a hero. I'm just tapping the breaks and trying to think my way through this. I have a hard time calling him a hero for the reasons I mentioned. That doesn't mean I think he is a murderous psychopath either, just not a hero.

It isn't being turned back on me. You are obsessing about a very trivial portion of my argument. I used the term brown originally as theater to make my point have more bite. It was not and has not been the central focus of any of my arguments.
 
It isn't being turned back on me. You are obsessing about a very trivial portion of my argument. I used the term brown originally as theater to make my point have more bite. It was not and has not been the central focus of any of my arguments.

Fair enough.
 
It's so boring when everybody agrees. It's so useless when disagreements devolve into pissing matches. I love it when people argue the things I say. People tend to argue points nobody made, while attributing these false arguments to people they disagree with...and of course the usual name-calling, which is always the best place to take an intellectual discussion.

Even more useless when people take being called obtuse a mortal insult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Even more useless when people take being called obtuse a mortal insult.

Actually, I think I am the one that recognizes insults don't hurt at all...one of the reasons I don't use them. People that use them likely use them because they think they do hurt*, and are probably the type to take offense.

*Why else would they use them?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
He saved countless American soldiers from injury and or death. He put his butt on the line when he was highly sought after by the enemy. Many other soldiers thought he was a hero, so I think they are the experts on the matter.
This board will praise a 18 year old for catching a winning TD, but can not understand the dedication and sacrifice of these kinds of men?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement





Back
Top