The only real distinction I can make out between communism and fascism is the matter of who exactly owns the means of production. Both are centrally planned economies. Communists take away ownership from the existing owners and then give it to their politically connected cronies (while claiming that ownership is being transferred to the „proletariat“).
Fascists allow the nominal ownership of industrial concerns to keep their positions as figureheads as long as they obey the dictates of the state.
In either case, all production is controlled by the state; the communists merely replace the people benefitted with their acolytes
And Nazism called for control of the means of production, the state seizure of property, etc... They were full-on socialists
In consideration of the monstrous sacrifice in property and blood that each war demands of the people personal enrichment through a war must be designated as a crime against the people. Therefore we demand the total confiscation of all war profits.
We demand the nationalization of all (previous) associated industries (trusts).
We demand a division of profits of all heavy industries.
We demand an expansion on a large scale of old age welfare.
We demand the creation of a healthy middle class and its conservation, immediate communalization of the great warehouses and their being leased at low cost to small firms, the utmost consideration of all small firms in contracts with the State, county or municipality.
The state is to be responsible for a fundamental reconstruction of our whole national education program, to enable every capable and industrious German to obtain higher education and subsequently introduction into leading positions. The plans of instruction of all educational institutions are to conform with the experiences of practical life. The comprehension of the concept of the State must be striven for by the school [Staatsbuergerkunde] as early as the beginning of understanding. We demand the education at the expense of the State of outstanding intellectually gifted children of poor parents without consideration of position or profession.
The State is to care for the elevating national health by protecting the mother and child, by outlawing child-labor, by the encouragement of physical fitness, by means of the legal establishment of a gymnastic and sport obligation, by the utmost support of all organizations concerned with the physical instruction of the young.
it’s like her persona.. on a positive note, her hair does look better
