Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

Lol, I haven't peddled anything, just linked Kirk's direct quotes.

He'd probably find your attempts at whitewashing his beliefs reprehensible consigning how ardently he promoted them.
You have lied. You've posted portions of his quotes in an attempt to taint a man's character. You are a pathetic excuse for a person. At the same time you worship a criminal, drug addicted, wife beating, thug that held a gun to a pregnant woman's belly. That's speaks about your character.
 
Lol, I haven't peddled anything, just linked Kirk's direct quotes.

He'd probably find your attempts at whitewashing his beliefs reprehensible consigning how ardently he promoted them.

Every person he was referring to are undeniable recipients of affirmative action/dei, not because of their “brain processing power” aka merit.
 
Lol, I haven't peddled anything, just linked Kirk's direct quotes.

He'd probably find your attempts at whitewashing his beliefs reprehensible consigning how ardently he promoted them.
You actually shared twits with supposed statements that had quotes around them, that were not direct quotes. Every other supposed quote that you have linked to, that I have followed, were stripped from context to mean something different than the full context revealed.



It's interesting that you are quiet about this one...


I would say that you should be ashamed of yourself, but it's a lost cause. Carry on with your agenda. It's a failing pursuit that is backfiring miserably.
 
Every person he was referring to are undeniable recipients of affirmative action/dei, not because of their “brain processing power” aka merit.
The context of the video was a response to each of them saying that they would not be where they are without AA/DEI, as far as I can tell. Even Michelle Obama plainly said she did not have the grades for Princeton, her HS guidance counselor seems to have shared the same opinion, and that she was there (Princeton) b/c of AA.

"It was impossible to be a black kid at a mostly white school and not feel the shadow of affirmative action. You could almost read the scrutiny in the gaze of certain students and even some professors, as if they wanted to say, 'I know why you’re here.' These moments could be demoralizing, even if I’m sure I was just imagining some of it," she wrote. "It planted a seed of doubt. Was I here merely as part of a social experiment?"
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I believe it was the sermon the mount were Jesus clarified that one should only treat immigrants in your lands as with love and compassion, if they can speak your native tongue.

That a 5 minute clip of him explaining why he can't seem to muster any compassion for immigrants that don't speak English.

Very Christ-like.

Your position is for open borders?

Your position is for the church to run the government?

Jesus said to obey the laws of your government. We have an immigration law that states you must seek asylum, apply for citizenship, or seek Visas. Should the process be easier? Absolutely. Should someone be allowed to enter the country illegally? Absolutely not.

The Church (Christians) should feed the hungry and clothed the poor (including immigrants) as Jesus commanded, not the government.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
Your position is for open borders?

Your position is for the church to run the government?

Jesus said to obey the laws of your government. We have an immigration law that states you must seek asylum, apply for citizenship, or seek Visas. Should the process be easier? Absolutely. Should someone be allowed to enter the country illegally? Absolutely not.

The Church (Christians) should feed the hungry and clothed the poor (including immigrants) as Jesus commanded, not the government.
What's interesting is that, primarily the only time immigration is really mentioned in the Bible is ancient Israel. Foreigners could come live within Israel, but they were held to strict legal standards. I say, "what's interesting" is that even Israelites could lose their citizenship if they refused to abide Jewish national culture and identity.

I'm pretty convinced that none of the liberals here trying to use this misguided argument to bully Christians really want us to start pushing for ancient Israel's laws to become a modern theocracy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MOOOOONEY
Ahem. Trump doesn't have a monopoly on disappointing behavior at funerals



Interesting, thanks for sharing that. Guess time will tell how Kirk's legacy plays out and of course this is somewhat different since Wellstone dided in a small plane crash whereas Kirk was murdered, apparently politically motivated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
Because they are. They are quite literally mythologizing his death in real time.

“It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed.”

“His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.”




Who are these quotes from?


Should I to go to social media and collect random quotes to support that liberals have a demonic bloodlust and are out to kill conservatives. Surely if I can find 20, 100, 2,000 that makes it true!

Such a sad argument.
 
Here's what's really sad. The left couldn't take Charlie on in life in the open marketplace of ideas, so they cheapen themselves by trying to destroy his arguments after his voice is silenced by a liberal assassin.

I don't think there's any weaker look imaginable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mr.checkerboards
Who are these quotes from?


Should I to go to social media and collect random quotes to support that liberals have a demonic bloodlust and are out to kill conservatives. Surely if I can find 20, 100, 2,000 that makes it true!

Such a sad argument.
Andrew Kolvet is the spokesperson for Turning Point USA, and the producer of Charlie Kirk's show.
1000005581.png
 
My uncle was San Diego PD for a long time and he said that it was against there training. What happened to George Floyd was unacceptable but the reactions were bad too... looting stores that had nothing to do with the event did not bring justice to George Floyd.
Nothing against your uncle but the department SOP explicitly laid out that technique in court documents... So it's not really a surprise that I'm free roam California they don't follow now hands on procedures.
 
Democrats continue forward with their repugnant actions related to Kirk's assassination ...

From the article:

Some Democrats claim to want “unity” in the wake of the far-left political violence they fomented, but it is hard to believe they want anything other than to be absolved of responsibility when 118 of them in the House refuse to officially condemn the assassination of Charlie Kirk.

As has been proven time and time again, Democrats do revel in political violence — and, at least with their votes, they are saying that out loud.

The stratified voting stands in stark contrast to a similar resolution earlier this year condemning the killing of Minnesota Speaker of the House Melissa Hortman, which passed unanimously. It had similar language condemning political violence generally, but of course, Democrats are wont to condemn political violence when it is another Democrat who suffers it — not when a conservative does.


 
Your position is for open borders?

Your position is for the church to run the government?

Jesus said to obey the laws of your government. We have an immigration law that states you must seek asylum, apply for citizenship, or seek Visas. Should the process be easier? Absolutely. Should someone be allowed to enter the country illegally? Absolutely not.

The Church (Christians) should feed the hungry and clothed the poor (including immigrants) as Jesus commanded, not the government.
My position is that Kirk's admitted lack of love empathy for immigrants is antithetical to the teachings of Christ.

Which the post I responded to demanded "proof" that Kirk's beliefs were at odds with his professed faith.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Advertisement

Back
Top