Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

No not all. you should try to carry a gun into Neyland stadium.
Good point! Would you have a problem if you could carry into Neyland Stadium? Not trying for a "gotcha", either. I wouldn't be totally against it if mentally ill citizens weren't allowed to purchase a gun. I've been to a over a hundred games there in my lifetime, but I have never felt unsafe while there. So I wouldn't carry, but I wouldn't have a problem with those who do if the restriction on gun ownership was as I described
 
Good point! Would you have a problem if you could carry into Neyland Stadium? Not trying for a "gotcha", either. I wouldn't be totally against it if mentally ill citizens weren't allowed to purchase a gun. I've been to an over a hundred games there in my lifetime, but I have never felt unsafe while there. So I wouldn't carry, but I wouldn't have a problem with those who do if the restriction on gun ownership was as I described
No need to carry when you got snipers on the roof at Neyland
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
"Christian beliefs"

You realize you're shredding your credibility.

This is an example of what we were taught about forked tongues as a kid.

You dislike the guys politics so badly you ignore his character because it exposes yours.
 
Last edited:
Good point! Would you have a problem if you could carry into Neyland Stadium? Not trying for a "gotcha", either. I wouldn't be totally against it if mentally ill citizens weren't allowed to purchase a gun. I've been to an over a hundred games there in my lifetime, but I have never felt unsafe while there. So I wouldn't carry, but I wouldn't have a problem with those who do if the restriction on gun ownership was as

Yes I think legal gun owners should be allowed to carry. Like you I have never felt unsafe. I think UT and Knoxville police do a great job at UT sporting events.
 
You realize you're shredding your credibility.

This is an example of what we were taught about forked tongues as a kid.

You dislike the guys politics so badly you ignore his character because it exposed yours.
The problem with trying to canonize Kirk as the first saint of MAGA Christianity is that there's literally hours of footage of him expressing beliefs that are antithetical to the teachings of Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
How would you define an "expert in Christianity"?

Would that be a person who lives the teachings of Christ, or a person who espouses the platitudes that make you feel better about your own lack of living Christ's teachings?
Sometimes folks are completely different than what they post online, but all I have to go by are your posts here. If you think posting out of context quotes to try to smear a man murdered trying to have a dialogue with different people, ok… not sure that qualifies as living by His teachings. Hypocrisy is nothing new, though.
 
The problem with trying to canonize Kirk as the first saint of MAGA Christianity is that there's literally hours of footage of him expressing beliefs that are antithetical to the teachings of Christ.
I'm not canonizing him, he's a flawed person just like you or I. I'm just not cool with slandering his name for political points, and I flat out reject the last sentence. You want to believe he's antithetical to Christians, and judging by your source material for citation you've either been completely deceived or you are deceiving. The context and actual quotes word for word have been provided....... Yet you cling to the false narrative.
 
The problem with trying to canonize Kirk as the first saint of MAGA Christianity is that there's literally hours of footage of him expressing beliefs that are antithetical to the teachings of Christ.
I’m going to need you to show your work….not your normal lies….complete evidence in proper context.

Considering you are in direct opposition to Messiah with your accusation
 
Advertisement

Back
Top