Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

#7,076
#7,076
InVOLuntary said:
I dealt with some folks that worked at Home Depot. It was a girl. She was very boyish. I was always kind to her and joked with her. She seemed angry all the time so I was just trying to get a smile out of her.

After a few weeks I noticed I hadn't seen her in a while. Another employee said that she and her partner had picked up and moved to Washington state so they could "be around more of their kind".

She went on to explain that she wanted to transition to a male and her partner, a male wanted to transition to a female.
Click to expand...
Strange ….. very strange
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#7,079
#7,079
luthervol said:
www.usatoday.com

Over 100 people have faced consequences for remarks about Charlie Kirk's death

A USA TODAY analysis shows more than 100 people have faced repercussions for remarks after the Sept. 10 slaying of Charlie Kirk.
www.usatoday.com
The analysis shows at least 50 educators, including high school teachers and college professors, have faced investigations or repercussions for their remarks amidst the wave of intense scrutiny of social media channels by Kirk's supporters.

lol.....so 50 educators out of 4,000,000........or 0.001%.

You guys are so brained washed it's terrifying.

Thousands? Not even close. But 99% of right wingers have been propagandized to believe so.
Click to expand...
There’s an investigation going on at my daughter’s school as we speak.
From what I know about it, I don’t think her CK comments merit being fired…..but she definitely made questionable remarks in front of numerous girls, including my daughter.

With that being said, other comments and behaviors that have come to light do warrant termination. Those include talking about the sex she and her husband have, making a remark to a girl about her being on birth control in front of a group and talking about how to give head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and InVOLuntary
#7,080
#7,080
luthervol said:
www.usatoday.com

Over 100 people have faced consequences for remarks about Charlie Kirk's death

A USA TODAY analysis shows more than 100 people have faced repercussions for remarks after the Sept. 10 slaying of Charlie Kirk.
www.usatoday.com
The analysis shows at least 50 educators, including high school teachers and college professors, have faced investigations or repercussions for their remarks amidst the wave of intense scrutiny of social media channels by Kirk's supporters.

lol.....so 50 educators out of 4,000,000........or 0.001%.

You guys are so brained washed it's terrifying.

Thousands? Not even close. But 99% of right wingers have been propagandized to believe so.
Click to expand...

That sounds like a lot to me. Do you believe right wing teachers think they can openly condone political assassination? Not a chance.

Any right wing position has been openly frowned upon for years
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#7,081
#7,081
Vol8188 said:
That sounds like a lot to me. Do you believe right wing teachers think they can openly condone political assassination? Not a chance.

Any right wing position has been openly frowned upon for years
Click to expand...
lol......There were teachers fired because of inappropriate reactions to George Floyd murder.
 
#7,084
#7,084
Vol8188 said:
Can you provide examples
Click to expand...

www.fox32chicago.com

Illinois teacher fired over anti-riot comments says colleagues 'terrified' for free speech

Judicial Watch has filed a First Amendment lawsuit on behalf of an Illinois teacher who was fired after criticizing the rioting, looting and other violence that broke out in Chicago after the death of George Floyd last May.
www.fox32chicago.com www.fox32chicago.com
www.theguardian.com

George Floyd: New Jersey teacher suspended over rant to pupils

In profanity-laced comments to pupils aired by local TV, Howard Zlotkin refers to Floyd as a ‘criminal’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
#7,085
#7,085
luthervol said:

www.fox32chicago.com

Illinois teacher fired over anti-riot comments says colleagues 'terrified' for free speech

Judicial Watch has filed a First Amendment lawsuit on behalf of an Illinois teacher who was fired after criticizing the rioting, looting and other violence that broke out in Chicago after the death of George Floyd last May.
www.fox32chicago.com www.fox32chicago.com
www.theguardian.com

George Floyd: New Jersey teacher suspended over rant to pupils

In profanity-laced comments to pupils aired by local TV, Howard Zlotkin refers to Floyd as a ‘criminal’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...


The Kirk killer will get the death penalty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
#7,086
#7,086
luthervol said:

www.fox32chicago.com

Illinois teacher fired over anti-riot comments says colleagues 'terrified' for free speech

Judicial Watch has filed a First Amendment lawsuit on behalf of an Illinois teacher who was fired after criticizing the rioting, looting and other violence that broke out in Chicago after the death of George Floyd last May.
www.fox32chicago.com www.fox32chicago.com
www.theguardian.com

George Floyd: New Jersey teacher suspended over rant to pupils

In profanity-laced comments to pupils aired by local TV, Howard Zlotkin refers to Floyd as a ‘criminal’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...


So that’s 5 vs 50? For an event that occurred years ago?

Vs 50 in less than 1 week?

You really think that’s on the same level?
 
#7,089
#7,089
Vol8188 said:
So that’s 5 vs 50? For an event that occurred years ago?

Vs 50 in less than 1 week?

You really think that’s on the same level?
Click to expand...
Please. I'm sure it was more than five.
Vol8188 said:
That sounds like a lot to me. Do you believe right wing teachers think they can openly condone political assassination? Not a chance.

Any right wing position has been openly frowned upon for years
Click to expand...
But you said NOT A CHANCE........
And 50 sounds like a lot????
You're busted.......it's ludicrous to think it's a one sided issue.
You're just confirming that you've been thoroughly brainwashed.
 
#7,090
#7,090
Vol8188 said:
Yes; you can make false statements. And yes, you obviously did make a false statement.

And then pathetically lied about it in post after post. Cant imagine why anyone would find attorneys to be despicable
Click to expand...

If I “made false statements” and “lied” then why does the article that you posted for your little gotcha game agree with the conclusion that he didn’t die from fentanyl? And why did it go out of its way to mention the ratio? Why did the toxicologist testify about the ratio at all?
 
#7,091
#7,091
Orange_Crush said:
It's a continuum.
Click to expand...
You know that you and the rest of the zombie herd thought the number was in the 1000's before I was forced to provide some actual facts.

Talk about uninformed.

Right wing social media rules the world....by propagandizing the mindless and gullible.
 
#7,092
#7,092
While he’s furiously googling, here’s the answer:

The effects of Fentanyl at a given blood concentration are not fixed, particularly in chronic users and outside of therapeutic levels. So the level of fentanyl in the blood that results in death is hard to pin down. Therefore, the quantity of fentanyl in the blood is not very informative in determining whether fentanyl was the cause of death.

Norfentanyl is the metabolite of fentanyl. The body breaks down fentanyl into norfentanyl over time. The presence of norfentanyl can indicate remote use and/or chronic use with higher levels being more consistent with the latter which is in turn consistent with a higher tolerance.

So the ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is the more relevant number in an overdose case. That ratio is higher in overdose deaths, I presume because the drug kills too quickly for the body to metabolize it. Apparently, there is no norfentanyl in a significant number of overdose death autopsies.

A lower ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is, of course, less consistent with overdose death because presumably the body has survived and metabolized more of the drug and/or the recent dose isn’t as great relative to the body’s tolerance.

In this case, the ratio was pretty low. Lower than the median of all fentanyl DUI cases studied by this lab over the relevant period (which is significant because presumably the people driving were alive) and much much lower (less than a quarter) of the average levels for blood samples tested for autopsies where the autopsied individual had fentanyl concentrations in the same range as Floyd’s.

Now everybody else can be glad that I shortened all that to “the fentanyl level” instead of glazing your eyes over with this **** you will never need to know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad, EasternVol and volfanhill
#7,093
#7,093
RockyTop85 said:
While he’s furiously googling, here’s the answer:

The effects of Fentanyl at a given blood concentration are not fixed, particularly in chronic users and outside of therapeutic levels. So the level of fentanyl in the blood that results in death is hard to pin down. Therefore, the quantity of fentanyl in the blood is not very informative in determining whether fentanyl was the cause of death.

Norfentanyl is the metabolite of fentanyl. The body breaks down fentanyl into norfentanyl over time. The presence of norfentanyl can indicate remote use and/or chronic use with higher levels being more consistent with the latter which is in turn consistent with a higher tolerance.

So the ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is the more relevant number in an overdose case. That ratio is higher in overdose deaths, I presume because the drug kills too quickly for the body to metabolize it. Apparently, there is no norfentanyl in a significant number of overdose death autopsies.

A lower ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is, of course, less consistent with overdose death because presumably the body has survived and metabolized more of the drug and/or the recent dose isn’t as great relative to the body’s tolerance.

In this case, the ratio was pretty low. Lower than the median of all fentanyl DUI cases studied by this lab over the relevant period (which is significant because presumably the people driving were alive) and much much lower (less than a quarter) of the average levels for blood samples tested for autopsies where the autopsied individual had fentanyl concentrations in the same range as Floyd’s.

Now everybody else can be glad that I shortened all that to “the fentanyl level” instead of glazing your eyes over with this **** you will never need to know.
Click to expand...
this is correct. I remember hearing about a dealer who had a 70 bag a day heroin habit

thats enough to kill most of the people who have posted in this thread combined
 
#7,094
#7,094
RockyTop85 said:
While he’s furiously googling, here’s the answer:

The effects of Fentanyl at a given blood concentration are not fixed, particularly in chronic users and outside of therapeutic levels. So the level of fentanyl in the blood that results in death is hard to pin down. Therefore, the quantity of fentanyl in the blood is not very informative in determining whether fentanyl was the cause of death.

Norfentanyl is the metabolite of fentanyl. The body breaks down fentanyl into norfentanyl over time. The presence of norfentanyl can indicate remote use and/or chronic use with higher levels being more consistent with the latter which is in turn consistent with a higher tolerance.

So the ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is the more relevant number in an overdose case. That ratio is higher in overdose deaths, I presume because the drug kills too quickly for the body to metabolize it. Apparently, there is no norfentanyl in a significant number of overdose death autopsies.

A lower ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is, of course, less consistent with overdose death because presumably the body has survived and metabolized more of the drug and/or the recent dose isn’t as great relative to the body’s tolerance.

In this case, the ratio was pretty low. Lower than the median of all fentanyl DUI cases studied by this lab over the relevant period (which is significant because presumably the people driving were alive) and much much lower (less than a quarter) of the average levels for blood samples tested for autopsies where the autopsied individual had fentanyl concentrations in the same range as Floyd’s.

Now everybody else can be glad that I shortened all that to “the fentanyl level” instead of glazing your eyes over with this **** you will never need to know.
Click to expand...
Can you sum this up for someone with a disorder in the ADHD family?

I got into the second paragraph saw Chronic........ Great album....... And I was off the rails
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13 and RockyTop85
#7,095
#7,095
#7,099
#7,099
RockyTop85 said:
While he’s furiously googling, here’s the answer:

The effects of Fentanyl at a given blood concentration are not fixed, particularly in chronic users and outside of therapeutic levels. So the level of fentanyl in the blood that results in death is hard to pin down. Therefore, the quantity of fentanyl in the blood is not very informative in determining whether fentanyl was the cause of death.

Norfentanyl is the metabolite of fentanyl. The body breaks down fentanyl into norfentanyl over time. The presence of norfentanyl can indicate remote use and/or chronic use with higher levels being more consistent with the latter which is in turn consistent with a higher tolerance.

So the ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is the more relevant number in an overdose case. That ratio is higher in overdose deaths, I presume because the drug kills too quickly for the body to metabolize it. Apparently, there is no norfentanyl in a significant number of overdose death autopsies.

A lower ratio of fentanyl to norfentanyl is, of course, less consistent with overdose death because presumably the body has survived and metabolized more of the drug and/or the recent dose isn’t as great relative to the body’s tolerance.

In this case, the ratio was pretty low. Lower than the median of all fentanyl DUI cases studied by this lab over the relevant period (which is significant because presumably the people driving were alive) and much much lower (less than a quarter) of the average levels for blood samples tested for autopsies where the autopsied individual had fentanyl concentrations in the same range as Floyd’s.

Now everybody else can be glad that I shortened all that to “the fentanyl level” instead of glazing your eyes over with this **** you will never need to know.
Click to expand...
I’m not reading all that!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RockyTop85
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top