Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

[InVOLuntary]

Yeah, as compared to the entirety of the people in the administration. That's not the gotcha you think. It's reflective of your cellar dwelling intellect

It's pretty obvious. You want more stuff or have you had enough?

 

[Vol8188]

It's obvious

Please enlighten us. Why would they need to fabricate text messages?

 

[GAVol]

Do you think it's a conspiracy?

I don’t know that I’d call it a conspiracy but the wording and the detail feels odd.

 

[McDad]

That’s one theory. Some are saying there’s sections missing as well. I’m not saying yes or no, just what’s floating around.

Ok. Can you share what the other theories are please?

 

[McDad]

I don’t know that I’d call it a conspiracy but the wording and the detail feels odd.

Ok.
I'm trying to understand what is the purpose for the text exchange to be altered? And who altered it?

 

[volbeast33]

Jimmy has always been a little dweeb, I don't necessarily agree with how it came about but I love seeing that smug ************ get some comeuppance. About fifteen years ago his heart was bleeding for some predictably-stupid reason and he began waxing poetic regarding how he knew the plights of growing up poor despite being the child of IBM and AmEx brass. The man is an utter clown.

I’m glad Adam Carolla never sold out like Jimmy. Jimmy is the biggest putz on TV.

 

[Vol8188]

Ok.
I'm trying to understand what is the purpose for the text exchange to be altered? And who altered it?

My theory is it feels weird not because it was altered but because Robinson sent it in an effort to make it seem like his boyfriend did not know ahead of time

 

[PEPPERJAX]

I’m glad Adam Carolla never sold out like Jimmy. Jimmy is the biggest putz on TV.

Adam is actually a reasonable person.

 

[GAVol]

Ok.
I'm trying to understand what is the purpose for the text exchange to be altered? And who altered it?

I don’t know that it’s altered, but it feels a little too proper and staged.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I said it was a blending of both.
I said raping, killing, and then eating a two year old is objectively wrong. And ironically enough......99.999% of the world's population would agree.

So that child abuse is objectively wrong, independent of any opinion. No matter if lots of people believe it today, as you point out. Or if no one believed it, and everyone was raping, killing, and eating two year olds. Yes?

If so, what is the source of this objective morality?

(It is confusing because you seem to be saying different things that seem to be inconsistent. The fact that slavery was less wrong when it was accepted than it is wrong today, now that opinions have changed. Is that one of the "wrongs" that is not 'actually' wrong, just subjectively wrong? It must be if it changed with opinion.

If everyone was raping, killing, and eating toddlers, would that too be less wrong then than it is now with nearly everyone's agreement? And would it be wrong in a remote jungle tribe that raped, killed and ate toddlers?)

If so, why?

I have no clue what your second question is asking.

Have access and correct perceptions of truth/reality????? wth???

Yes. I believe you said that you believe that there is an objective truth. A really real, independent of anyone's perception or opinion. If that is the case, how can you know that you know it? What makes you believe that you can correctly know and perceive it?

 

[W.TN.Orange Blood]

 

[volinbham]

Ok.
I'm trying to understand what is the purpose for the text exchange to be altered? And who altered it?

yeah, you have to go pretty deep to theorize that law enforcement did this - state of Utah did this? FBI did it and gave it the state and the state willingly played along?

 

[Orange_Crush]

Ok. Can you share what the other theories are please?

Steven King wrote them.

 

[ButchPlz]

View attachment 774464

I didn't realize he was still "relevant".

 

[McDad]

yeah, you have to go pretty deep to theorize that law enforcement did this - state of Utah did this? FBI did it and gave it the state and the state willingly played along?

I could see him protecting his lover. But I thought the boyfriend turned him in to police.

 

[wtmvol]

I don’t know that it’s altered, but it feels a little too proper and staged.

@bamawriter suggested that’s because what we’re seeing is a transcription of the original texts, not the actual texts. That does make more sense, but I still believe the roommate was in on it and the texts are a cover for him(her?)

 

[Orange_Crush]

I could see him protecting his lover. But I thought the boyfriend turned him in to police.

No. Pastor friend of the family talking into turning himself in with his father. Reports have been that the boyfriend was at least initially cooperating with law enforcement. I would think she probably lawyered up after their initial visit/interview where she offered for them to see the texts on her phone.

 

[Orange_Crush]

@bamawriter suggested that’s because what we’re seeing is a transcription of the original texts, not the actual texts. That does make more sense, but I still believe the roommate was in on it and the texts are a cover for him(her?)

"I knew nothing about it beforehand. See?"

 

[apevol]

I could see him protecting his lover. But I thought the boyfriend turned him in to police.

I've decided to wait until everyone involved is dead before trying to figure out whats going on. thats how these things seem to go

 

[The Original Fade]

My thoughts exactly. The answer to free speech that you find offensive is more free speech. Never violence

 

[BartW]

I never saw the original report you’re referencing

Sorry this feels like a million news cycles ago. But I was referencing early reports from the Guardian that he was leftist (the source was a supposed friend or classmate who was discredited) and by the WSJ that the bullets were engraved with trans ideology

 

[McDad]

No. Pastor friend of the family talking into turning himself in with his father. Reports have been that the boyfriend was at least initially cooperating with law enforcement. I would think she probably lawyered up after their initial visit/interview where she offered for them to see the texts on her phone.

Ok thanks.
I'm sorry, I thought he was in a homosexual relationship???

 

[BernardKingGOAT]

It's pretty obvious. You want more stuff or have you had enough?

No. It's becoming entertaining how you twisted one question into a claim that Obama governed as fascist. Go for it. Almost everyone who reads your posts laughs at your idiocy anyway.

 

[Vol8188]

Sorry this feels like a million news cycles ago. But I was referencing early reports from the Guardian that he was leftist (the source was a supposed friend or classmate who was discredited) and by the WSJ that the bullets were engraved with trans ideology

Got ya. But they never actually stated he “is trans”, right?

 

[Vol8188]

Ok thanks.
I'm sorry, I thought he was in a homosexual relationship???

Depends on your views of transgenderism. If you think “women” is a statement mind, he was in a heterosexual relationship. If you live in baseline reality, he was gay AF