It's certainly a blending of both.That sounds like the opposite of your answer the last times we've tried to discuss this. I seem to recall that you believed that morality is subjective and defined by society.
Now, you believe that morality is objectively true, independent of what a single person believes, or every person believes? Does that help clarify?
So, you do not believe in an objective morality. Morality is defined by society(ies). Yes?It's certainly a blending of both.
Morality is by and large subjective and defined by society. Always has been and always will be.
I do not believe that slavey was equally immoral 6000, 600, 200, and 50 years ago.
I do not believe that child labor was equally immoral 200, 100, 50, and 5 years ago.
I said it was a blending of both.So, you do not believe in an objective morality. Morality is defined by society(ies). Yes?
Also, lest we forget. If you believe that you can have access and correct perception of truth/reality, what makes you believe that?
Are you seriously trying to defend trans boys playing girls sports?Because if she'd taken a bad spike to the head by a cisgener player, she would of course not sustained this injury?