GVF
Talk Dirty To Me
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 14,381
- Likes
- 12,890
Why did Charlie call her views on Israel demonic just last month? Why have they not appeared in any public setting or podcast in over a year? Why did Charlie say he won’t debate her on Israel but has no problem inviting others (like Dave smith) talk about Israel on his platforms? Why was she not at the memorial for him and not set to be a speaker at his funeral?Candace who was VERY close to Charlie is taking A LOT of heat for comments on releasing texts and emails from Charlie.
Exactly, which isn't treason simply because we were lax on border policy. Hell, Reagan granted asylum to a ton of undocumented persons when he was President. That wasn't treason eitherDuring an episode of The Charlie Kirk Show, he stated: "I know what you're thinking, we've got to get Joe Biden out of the way so we can run against Kammy. Oh my goodness, is she beatable. ... [Biden] should be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for crimes against America." This remark was in the context of criticizing Biden's border policies as treasonous.
It appears to me he’s calling Biden a traitor
Brandon is an awesome guy, but he’s way down on the list that includes Shapiro, Walsh, Knowles, Kirk, Rubin, etc. Conservative politics is a desirable field to get into and has been for 10+ years.I’m quite curious though why Officer Tatum(?) has not been accused of the same things Kirk is accused of. Thoughts?
And I'm the dumb mf? ( the first sign of getting destroyed is name calling, I'll except that as victory). I asked about all that stuff. You can go back and look. You literally dismissed Obama's role in the dossier. I've provided two quotes that prove that. Have you had enough or should I continue? Maybe you would like to shoot me?Obama's role wasn't exposed until after he was President. Do you not understand that he was unable to be impeached? You're a dumb MFer who can't comprehend simple explanations.
You never asked about the other stuff you're rambling about. You're trying so hard to invent something about me and my positions on specific issues that it makes you look like a pathetic, jealous loser. You're manufacturing a conflict and literally lying your ass off on every post
You're reaching, man.And I'm the dumb mf? ( the first sign of getting destroyed is name calling, I'll except that as victory). I asked about all that stuff. You can go back and look. You literally dismissed Obama's role in the dossier. I've provided two quotes that prove that. Have you had enough or should I continue? Maybe you would like to shoot me?
Looks like Jimmy may have stepped in it
You can if you wish. It's not going to change the facts at all. Your interpretation and misrepresentation of my answers isn't going to change either.Should I quote the two post again?
And thanks for conceding not so gracefully.
1970 was a good year (college freshman) except for the Viet Nam War. The draft caused a lot of young men die.
This feels like a run-around. It feels like you just don't want to give a straight answer. If that's the case, just say so.Anyone or everyone?
But I guess considering the raping, killing, and then eating of a two year old child to be wrong may fall in that category.
So you do believe that you have access to and can know at least some objective truth? If so, what makes you believe that? (I'm asking because I don't want to misrepresent you from an aging memory per several years ago.)
Is it because you don't believe in objective moral truth that you do not believe that you can prove that Trump is a horrendously despicable person? Because you don't have anything of substance to base the claim on?