Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

#6,503
#6,503
itsme said:
My obsession comes from the fact that my daughter played volleyball. During her senior year a boy in North Carolina pretended to be a girl and spiked a volleyball so hard into a girl's head that she continues to have medical issues to this day. The fact that you and your ilk cannot understand that boys that have reached puberty are bigger, faster and stronger make me question your ability to discern anything with any amount of intelligence.
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: itsme
#6,504
#6,504
Orange_Crush said:
"I didn't even know who he was a few days ago, but here I am pushing my relative truth as the expert on what he said and meant."

Geez guy, it was sick and twisted enough when we thought you may know anything about him.
Click to expand...
Again????
Please
How about you show the board how I presented myself as anything resembling an expert.
Oh, wait a minute, you can't.
 
#6,507
#6,507
whodeycin85 said:
Your in a forum specifically for politics..perhaps you shouldn't be as it doesn't seem you want to discuss anything. And yes you need luck, id suspect moreso then you realize.
Click to expand...
I don't need luck in this forum. Certainly it's needed in the real world and I have taken advantage of it when I have gotten it
 
#6,509
#6,509
luthervol said:
So I take it you no longer plan to attempt to do better?
Click to expand...

Please point out where I called you a Nazi, Hitler, fascist, communist, etc.

You invited a poll of the platform you've created here to change the hearts and minds of VolNation, now you're tapping out when someone filled that poll out?

Again, it was funny enough when Mr. No-Objective-Truth came in as you usually do, correcting everyone else on what Charie "meant", and about his motives.

I found it personally disgusting that you wanted to come in vomiting about a man who'd just been murdered in large part because of people being convinced of the tripe you were peddling.

But to have done that, and then come in here and admitted that you'd done so from a place of ignorance... That just compounds the issue that the majority here have with you doing so. With that limited knowledge of the guy, you know his motives. Don't actually believe in universal, objective truth, but you'll post supposed "facts" at every opportunity to correct those who are "wrong".

And you think you're the guy changing hearts and minds here, huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeeohdeeWood and SpaceCoastVol
#6,512
#6,512
appvol said:
Your opinions don’t mean crap if you can’t post facts about Kirk. Probably right because thankfully I didn’t go to college. Have a job that provides for me and my family. You are just a educated fool
Click to expand...
So when Kirk said, "the death toll in Texas would likely have been less without DEI", that isn't a form of hate speech.

Yes, I am educated but also have a tremendous amount of experience too, that provided very well for me

You engage in hateful rhetoric almost every day in this forum
 
#6,515
#6,515
n_huffhines said:
VN has a plague of posters in the politics forum who don't want to argue what you're saying, so they pretend you have a different position, or they invent motives for you, and then they argue with that.

It's almost as if it's a microcosm of a society that championed a guy for his approach to public discourse when the reality is he rose to fame by gaining attention by arguing in bad faith.
Click to expand...
This is one of about five mind numbing archetypes in this forum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines and BernardKingGOAT
#6,516
#6,516
LouderVol said:
it says that ones being targeted are the ones in power. The right is in power now, so they aren't as threatened by the other side...at the moment only. If it was Obama in charge doing the exact same things Trump was doing now; the reactions by both sides would be flipped.

neither side actually wants things to get better. neither side is taking any action that would have diminished the chance of Charlie Kirk being assassinated. both sides are using his death to score political points while giving hollow speeches and acting in a counter productive manner.

if YOU don't want to see more deaths like CK, YOU need to make sure YOU actually change before you go expecting it of others.
Click to expand...
SO when Obama was in power, how many times was there assassination attempts? How many liberals were shot at?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#6,519
#6,519
luthervol said:
Again????
Please
How about you show the board how I presented myself as anything resembling an expert.
Oh, wait a minute, you can't.
Click to expand...
Well, obviously more of an expert than the ones you tried and failed to correct. (You want to argue that vocabulary in hopes that the gallery misses the striking and blatant point?)

Mr. Real-Truth-Doesn't-Exist came in here as the guy that would correct everyone on what Charlie said. That fell through when we broke out the crayons to point out what he said. Mr. Real-Truth-Doesn't-Exist dropped some truth about his motives.

Then you made the mistake of claiming that you'd only recently ever heard of him. (Iguess you thought that would be a neat escape from someone thinking you were using lazy thinking. You actually tried to infer that the people who'd formed their opinions from having been exposed to him for an extended time were the 'lazy thinkers'. lol)

Listen, if there are all these different, equally unequal non-true-truths out there for you. Go shop for some different ones, because the ones you create are really, really bad.
 
Last edited:
#6,520
#6,520
BernardKingGOAT said:
Exactly. Neither the Nixon nor Obama Administrations governed in a form of fascism.

You're a liar and a dumbass
Click to expand...
Typical liberal response especially when you are caught in a lie. You are the worst kind of liberal, the closet one. I don't agree much with @Luther but I respect him for being what he is.

Let's continue on this journey of inlightenment. Maybe you woke make a fool out of yourself this time.

Was it the Nazis that disarmed their populace?
 
#6,523
#6,523
luthervol said:
...

CK's "logical conclusion" was intentionally twisted and non-sensical......but he knew it would play with his audience.
Maybe racist????
Click to expand...

luthervol said:
I'd never even heard of the guy. Not being emersed in politicized social media in no way equates to low effort thinking.
I would say more of the opposite is true.
Click to expand...

Tell me, Luther, the striking delta between those two statements aside, how do you know Charlie's intentions? On what do you base these truth claims? Your startling confessed ignorance about him aside, at a principal level, how did you come to know these truths?
 
#6,524
#6,524
BernardKingGOAT said:
So when Kirk said, "the death toll in Texas would likely have been less without DEI", that isn't a form of hate speech.

Yes, I am educated but also have a tremendous amount of experience too, that provided very well for me

You engage in hateful rhetoric almost every day in this forum
Click to expand...
Maybe Kirk was right. Maybe lives could of been saved if the Austin Chief would of done his job which is to save lives
www.firerescue1.com

Union: 93% of firefighters vote 'no confidence' in chief over Texas flood response

Union leaders claim that department directives limited the deployment of Austin firefighters during the deadly Kerr County flooding
www.firerescue1.com www.firerescue1.com
 
#6,525
#6,525
Orange_Crush said:
Please point out where I called you a Nazi, Hitler, fascist, communist, etc.

You invited a poll of the platform you've created here to change the hearts and minds of VolNation, now you're tapping out when someone filled that poll out?

Again, it was funny enough when Mr. No-Objective-Truth came in as you usually do, correcting everyone else on what Charie "meant", and about his motives.

I found it personally disgusting that you wanted to come in vomiting about a man who'd just been murdered in large part because of people being convinced of the tripe you were peddling.

But to have done that, and then come in here and admitted that you'd done so from a place of ignorance... That just compounds the issue that the majority here have with you doing so. With that limited knowledge of the guy, you know his motives. Don't actually believe in universal, objective truth, but you'll post supposed "facts" at every opportunity to correct those who are "wrong".

And you think you're the guy changing hearts and minds here, huh?
Click to expand...
You just continue to be so far off base it's amazing.
Last night you accused me of calling trump/trumpers a few names including the new Nazis by searching back a few years and pulling an old post of mine.
I had to point out to you that it was actually a volnation poster calling me those names.
You never once said "my bad" or "sorry about that". Good grief!

Now you're disgusted about me vomiting about a man.......good grief part 2! Over half the nation had no clue who the guy was. What I did was state how what he said could be taken as "maybe racist" by that majority.
You keep spewing forth about me presenting myself as an expert. Good grief part 3. I asked you twice to show any post of mine that supported that accusation. Of course you didn't.

I invited a poll of the platform???? good grief part 4. That was McDad.....I did tell him to go for it.

Now let me jump over to the other thread where NCFisher is going nuts over a post from 6+ years ago thinking it is recent.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top