85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 35,321
- Likes
- 70,907
It is 100% true. Everything I posted is 100% true.Back to that name calling debate...............
One example out of hundreds that could easily be found directed at me.
I'm fairly certain these posters were rarely, if ever, called out for these types of posts.
Please don't tell me it's the left who is full of venom.
Political pest who Lied He'd Shot Charlie Kirk moments after assassination 'caught with Child Porn on His Phone'
The elderly man who lied about shooting Charlie Kirk just moments after the conservative activist's assassination was caught with child pornography on his phone, authorities said.
George Zinn, a 71-year-old Utah resident, was initially suspected of being the shooter after he was caught on video being taken into custody moments after Kirk, 31, was shot in the neck at an event at Utah Valley University last week.
He was soon cleared of being the suspected shooter and confessed to causing a distraction to keep law enforcement away from the shooter, now alleged to be 22-year-old Tyler Robinson.
After agreeing to hand his phone over to FBI agents, they found a number of images 'of prepubescent girls scantily dressed,' police said.
The Utah Special Victims Unit then took over the matter, leading them to uncover a trove of more evidence on Zinn's phone.
A search warrant was obtained on Monday and investigators found 'over 20 images of children ranging from 5 to 12 years old in various stages of undress and sexual posting,' authorities noted.
View attachment 774311
The known political activist admitted to police that 'he uses his phone to view and abuse child sex abuse material'
Authorities also uncovered 'several very graphic sexual text threads in which Zinn shared the images with other parties,' according to police.
He then admitted 'he gets sexual gratification from viewing and sharing' the images, and prefers children who are between 5 and 12 years old, the sheriff's office said.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15104765/george-zinn-child-porn-charlie-kirk.html
But nothing sticks out to you before Trump’s first term. Have you ever considered that there is intentional messaging coming from Trump and his administration that is designed to erode public trust in every institution, especially the “independent” ones that might hold him or his appointees accountable? For example Inspectors General, DOJ, the Judicial Branch, FBI, etc…
Must be hate watching. It's what I've done with UCLA's first 3 games. Could not get enough of Nico being terrible.Is it just me or is it the same three posters who pay any attention to what Whoopi Goldberg has to say about anything?
I'm not one to judge how others spend their time, but for ****'s sake it must be a sad situation to tune into the View, and to do so out of spite.
So the DOJ doubles down and uses it's influence to investigate and intimidate Mom's and dad's asking for input and transparency in their children's schooling? Aren't they just proving Trump correct? Or is it your position that never happened?But nothing sticks out to you before Trump’s first term. Have you ever considered that there is intentional messaging coming from Trump and his administration that is designed to erode public trust in every institution, especially the “independent” ones that might hold him or his appointees accountable? For example Inspectors General, DOJ, the Judicial Branch, FBI, etc…
If “evolution” means drag queens in kindergarten story time, men in women’s restrooms and sports teams, criminals being released back onto the street multiple times, and anti Jewish pogroms on college campuses; then I am quite happy to remain unevolved.One more thing that made it all so shocking. I think a lot of people overestimated the evolution of the country.
So the DOJ doubles down and uses it's influence to investigate and intimidate Mom's and dad's asking for input and transparency in their children's schooling? Aren't they just proving Trump correct? Or is it your position that never happened?
I have no problem with them being skeptical of Trump, they should be skeptical of all administrations.
There was no evolution, you saw Obama as some mythical being sent to set the country right. But he was always just the corrupt product of a corrupt system, Obama is the same as any other president with different window dressing. He's more like Trump than you care to admit, he just has a different style. But remember style is just window dressing.One more thing that made it all so shocking. I think a lot of people overestimated the evolution of the country.