Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

#6,127
#6,127
Franklin Pierce said:

Political pest who Lied He'd Shot Charlie Kirk moments after assassination 'caught with Child Porn on His Phone'​


The elderly man who lied about shooting Charlie Kirk just moments after the conservative activist's assassination was caught with child pornography on his phone, authorities said.

George Zinn, a 71-year-old Utah resident, was initially suspected of being the shooter after he was caught on video being taken into custody moments after Kirk, 31, was shot in the neck at an event at Utah Valley University last week.

He was soon cleared of being the suspected shooter and confessed to causing a distraction to keep law enforcement away from the shooter, now alleged to be 22-year-old Tyler Robinson.

After agreeing to hand his phone over to FBI agents, they found a number of images 'of prepubescent girls scantily dressed,' police said.

The Utah Special Victims Unit then took over the matter, leading them to uncover a trove of more evidence on Zinn's phone.

A search warrant was obtained on Monday and investigators found 'over 20 images of children ranging from 5 to 12 years old in various stages of undress and sexual posting,' authorities noted.

View attachment 774311
The known political activist admitted to police that 'he uses his phone to view and abuse child sex abuse material'

Authorities also uncovered 'several very graphic sexual text threads in which Zinn shared the images with other parties,' according to police.

He then admitted 'he gets sexual gratification from viewing and sharing' the images, and prefers children who are between 5 and 12 years old, the sheriff's office said.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15104765/george-zinn-child-porn-charlie-kirk.html
Click to expand...
Eww
 
#6,129
#6,129
I've got a question, I don't know why this just hit me but I'm curious and know there must be done reason.

Regarding the UK's limited free speech laws and the numerous stories about ordinary people being arrested for mundane comments by US standards. I saw Bob Vylan made some comments..... What is the threshold for offensive there. I know there must be a reason his statements don't run afoul of law, just wondering what that law is.
 
#6,130
#6,130
luthervol said:
Am I the only one who missed this??
Hilariously revealing.......

President Donald Trump took a swipe at his critics but seemingly revealed his thoughts on his supporters in the process. “Smart people don’t like me, you know? And they don’t like what we talk about,” Trump told attendees of a gala at his Bedminster, New Jersey golf club on Saturday.
Click to expand...
I did not miss it, and thought it was hilarious.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush and 82_VOL_83
#6,131
#6,131
n_huffhines said:
@Grand Vol your boy Kash is a BS artist. No ragrets about misinformation when you're going for likes and shares. Apparenly, he has no idea how delicate these situations are and how important it is to command trust. People that don't trust the government will run wild with incorrect initial reports like this. This isn't some journalist misunderstanding his/her source. This is the director of the FBI putting bad info out there. If you care about public trust, it's a huge deal.

"I stated in that message that we had a subject and that we were going to interview him, and we did and he was released," Patel told Fox News. "Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment? Sure. But do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not."

Imcompetent.

FTR, this was his tweet. Don't let him fool you.

"The subject for the horrific shooting today that took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in custody."

He's claiming this he was trying to be transparent. JFC, if he wants to prove he's about transparency, he knows what to do, and he's not going to do it.
Click to expand...

I'm glad you took the time to make a long and detailed post that I promptly ignored since "I told you so" was pretty much implied in the first sentence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#6,132
#6,132
luthervol said:
Back to that name calling debate...............
One example out of hundreds that could easily be found directed at me.
I'm fairly certain these posters were rarely, if ever, called out for these types of posts.
Please don't tell me it's the left who is full of venom.
Click to expand...
If Trump's despicable nature makes people call him names. A CK's hate makes people call him names. Wouldn't it also be true that your behaviors make people call you names?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol since 77, whodeycin85, WeeohdeeWood and 4 others
#6,135
#6,135
KB5252 said:
I've got a question, I don't know why this just hit me but I'm curious and know there must be done reason.

Regarding the UK's limited free speech laws and the numerous stories about ordinary people being arrested for mundane comments by US standards. I saw Bob Vylan made some comments..... What is the threshold for offensive there. I know there must be a reason his statements don't run afoul of law, just wondering what that law is.
Click to expand...

You know when they come knocking. You know what hurts worse than violence? Memes
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and 82_VOL_83
#6,136
#6,136
n_huffhines said:
@Grand Vol your boy Kash is a BS artist. No ragrets about misinformation when you're going for likes and shares. Apparenly, he has no idea how delicate these situations are and how important it is to command trust. People that don't trust the government will run wild with incorrect initial reports like this. This isn't some journalist misunderstanding his/her source. This is the director of the FBI putting bad info out there. If you care about public trust, it's a huge deal.

"I stated in that message that we had a subject and that we were going to interview him, and we did and he was released," Patel told Fox News. "Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment? Sure. But do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not."

Imcompetent.

FTR, this was his tweet. Don't let him fool you.

"The subject for the horrific shooting today that took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in custody."

He's claiming this he was trying to be transparent. JFC, if he wants to prove he's about transparency, he knows what to do, and he's not going to do it.
Click to expand...
The thing is, this administration does not care about public trust in our institutions. They have been actively undermining and eroding public trust with every opportunity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen, bamawriter and volfanhill
#6,139
#6,139
McDad said:
If Trump's despicable nature makes people call him names. A CK's hate makes people call him names. Wouldn't it also be true that your behaviors make people call you names?
Click to expand...
What kind of grown adult makes up disparaging pet names for people like a 3rd grade, school yard bully anyway?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen
#6,142
#6,142
luthervol said:
2008 always seemed like a massive move in the right direction to me. Perspective is so weird.
Click to expand...
I guess so lol.. I worked in a hospital where I was a minority in Louisiana and I’ve got some stories 😂 it was wild.. I got treated like crap, and I’m nice to everyone lol
 
#6,146
#6,146
luthervol said:
Why do I do what?

Trump accomplished becoming the most powerful, beloved, and worshiped human on the planet.
Click to expand...
Why do you do this:
McDad said:
If Trump's despicable nature makes people call him names. A CK's hate makes people call him names. Wouldn't it also be true that your behaviors make people call you names?
Click to expand...
You agreed with it 5 minutes ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top