Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

#5,961
#5,961
@Grand Vol your boy Kash is a BS artist. No ragrets about misinformation when you're going for likes and shares. Apparenly, he has no idea how delicate these situations are and how important it is to command trust. People that don't trust the government will run wild with incorrect initial reports like this. This isn't some journalist misunderstanding his/her source. This is the director of the FBI putting bad info out there. If you care about public trust, it's a huge deal.

"I stated in that message that we had a subject and that we were going to interview him, and we did and he was released," Patel told Fox News. "Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment? Sure. But do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not."

Imcompetent.

FTR, this was his tweet. Don't let him fool you.

"The subject for the horrific shooting today that took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in custody."

He's claiming this he was trying to be transparent. JFC, if he wants to prove he's about transparency, he knows what to do, and he's not going to do it.
 
Last edited:
#5,962
#5,962
Am I the only one who missed this??
Hilariously revealing.......

President Donald Trump took a swipe at his critics but seemingly revealed his thoughts on his supporters in the process. “Smart people don’t like me, you know? And they don’t like what we talk about,” Trump told attendees of a gala at his Bedminster, New Jersey golf club on Saturday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OHvol40 and Orange_Crush
#5,963
#5,963
n_huffhines said:
I get that you like that he's out there recruiting soldiers to your cause, but I see so many in here praising his method of debate, and he used cheap parlor tricks. We want better discourse in this country. He influenced a generation of kids who think this is how you engage.

His whole schtick was "prove me wrong." It's called the burden of proof fallacy. Everything he says starts with that premise, and this is out of bounds because it's generally hard to prove a negative. It's crazy that a whole country can look at this "prove me wrong" method and not immediately see the problem with it. It's right there in the name. He was telling us what he was doing before he did it. We are stupid.
Click to expand...
Proof???? It funny coming from a guy that doesn't post links to articles only screenshots and those are called out Everytime for being dishonest... 🤡
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77, Sea Ray, Cod and 3 others
#5,964
#5,964
n_huffhines said:
@Grand Vol your boy Kash is a BS artist. No ragrets about misinformation when you're going for likes and shares. Apparenly, he has no idea how delicate these situations are and how important it is to command trust. People that don't trust the government will run wild with incorrect initial reports like this. This isn't some journalist misunderstanding his/her source. This is the director of the FBI putting bad info out there. If you care about public trust, it's a huge deal.

"I stated in that message that we had a subject and that we were going to interview him, and we did and he was released," Patel told Fox News. "Could I have worded it a little better in the heat of the moment? Sure. But do I regret putting it out? Absolutely not."

Imcompent.

FTR, this was his tweet. Don't let him fool you.

"The subject for the horrific shooting today that took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in custody."

If he wants to prove you're about transparency, he knows what to do, and he's not going to do it.
Click to expand...
You think he was typing the sentence and changed his thoughts after he started? And just forgot to proofread?
 
#5,965
#5,965
luthervol said:
Am I the only one who missed this??
Hilariously revealing.......

President Donald Trump took a swipe at his critics but seemingly revealed his thoughts on his supporters in the process. “Smart people don’t like me, you know? And they don’t like what we talk about,” Trump told attendees of a gala at his Bedminster, New Jersey golf club on Saturday.
Click to expand...
That is such a Trump thing to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#5,966
#5,966
McDad said:
You think he was typing the sentence and changed his thoughts after he started? And just forgot to proofread?
Click to expand...

IDK what you're asking? IDK why he put bad info out there. The point is that it is incompetence.

Any other time in American history, we would be wondering wtf is going on when you can't trust the messaging of a Fauci, or a Patel, or a Trump or a Biden....and I'm not even talking about the times where they are trying to trick us. I'm just talking about incompetence. Trump probably really thought that 300m number was real.

They're not even smart enough to know they are ****ing up in a lot of cases. The president really spread the completely unsubstantiated rumor that people were eating pets. He was bewildered by his confrontation with the truth on that. This circus is just commonplace now.
 
#5,968
#5,968
n_huffhines said:
IDK what you're asking? IDK why he put bad info out there. The point is that it is incompetence.

Any other time in American history, we would be wondering wtf is going on when you can't trust the messaging of a Fauci, or a Patel, or a Trump or a Biden....and I'm not even talking about the times where they are trying to trick us. I'm just talking about incompetence. Trump probably really thought that 300m number was real.

They're not even smart enough to know they are ****ing up in a lot of cases. The president really spread the completely unsubstantiated rumor that people were eating pets. He was bewildered by his confrontation with the truth on that. This circus is just commonplace now.
Click to expand...
People mistype stuff all the time. I'm just asking if he could have started his sentence one way and changed his thought without proofreading? More of a typo.
A mistake for sure. But not intentional bad messaging.
 
#5,971
#5,971
McDad said:
People mistype stuff all the time. I'm just asking if he could have started his sentence one way and changed his thought without proofreading? More of a typo.
A mistake for sure. But not intentional bad messaging.
Click to expand...

Either way for me, it's the same problem. It could have been I typo. But I think the most likely thing is he thought they had the guy. Apparently, reports are now that the guy said he did it to stall LEO's? I saw a report of that but don't know if it was trustworthy. If so, this action by the guy would create confusion among officials, but this is why they vet information first. So often in these situations you hear the authorities have somebody in custody but no confirmation of anything, and I'm sitting there wondering why they're not just reporting that they got the guy yet....this is the reason.
 
#5,974
#5,974
n_huffhines said:
Either way for me, it's the same problem. It could have been I typo. But I think the most likely thing is he thought they had the guy. Apparently, reports are now that the guy said he did it to stall LEO's? I saw a report of that but don't know if it was trustworthy. If so, this action by the guy would create confusion among officials, but this is why they vet information first. So often in these situations you hear the authorities have somebody in custody but no confirmation of anything, and I'm sitting there wondering why they're not just reporting that they got the guy yet....this is the reason.
Click to expand...
I've been posting these replies tongue in cheek.
He may be just as you called him, "imcompent", in your post.
 
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top