Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

#5,377
#5,377
Sea Ray said:
I'm dealing with the dishonesty of the X post. Not good.

As for the specifics of what was said, IMO Charlie is saying that those 3 women are not very bright and they reached their positions because of affirmative action. Not because of merit
Click to expand...
Those women acknowledged affirmative action got them ahead, quoted and all. Not sure that’s really racism if they say it and Biden says he’s putting a black woman on the SC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sea Ray
#5,378
#5,378
BernardKingGOAT said:
"We all know you lack " is much different than that stupid explanation you copied and pasted

That's not translation. That's literally what he said and I never specifically called him a racist

I don't know who y'all are, but my people are my fellow Americans. You can take that broad brush and shove it up your ass
Click to expand...
Did he say "We all know all black women lack..."?


No. You are translating. You have to tell everyone WHY it's racist. That's telling.

The context is that he was talking specifically about the fact that these specific black women self-identified as DEI. So, at most, he was talking about these four women and DEI.

"If we'd claimed that (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) were all affirmative action picks, we'd have been called racist. But now they are saying it for us. They (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) are saying 'I am only here because of affirmative action'. Yah. We know. You (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) do not have the brain power to otherwise be taken seriously."

(BTW, four VERY PUBLIC women that he had ample opportunity to watch and form an opinion about the brainpower he was judging.)

Don't take my racist word for it. Here's another racist you can listen to.

 
  • Like
Reactions: volbound1700
#5,379
#5,379
BernardKingGOAT said:
"We all know you lack " is much different than that stupid explanation you copied and pasted

That's not translation. That's literally what he said and I never specifically called him a racist

I don't know who y'all are, but my people are my fellow Americans. You can take that broad brush and shove it up your ass
Click to expand...
Look above. I posted his exact words and context. Your assurances don't go very far. It's despicable.
 
#5,382
#5,382
Orange_Crush said:
Did he say "We all know all black women lack..."?


No. You are translating. You have to tell everyone WHY it's racist. That's telling.

The context is that he was talking specifically about the fact that these specific black women self-identified as DEI. So, at most, he was talking about these four women and DEI.

"If we'd claimed that (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) were all affirmative action picks, we'd have been called racist. But now they are saying it for us. They (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) are saying 'I am only here because of affirmative action'. Yah. We know. You (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) do not have the brain power to otherwise be taken seriously."

(BTW, four VERY PUBLIC women that he had ample opportunity to watch and form an opinion about the brainpower he was judging.)

Don't take my racist word for it. Here's another racist you can listen to.

Click to expand...

I never used the word racist. Sorry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#5,385
#5,385
Orange_Crush said:
Looking at you playing the racist card. If you don't want the "You may be racist" point to be taken, don't play it.
Click to expand...
lol.....Still avoiding the "conclusion".
What type of mind would find that to be a logical conclusion???????

I don't know, absent any other defense, possibly a racist mind???
 
#5,387
#5,387
Orange_Crush said:
Did he say "We all know all black women lack..."?


No. You are translating. You have to tell everyone WHY it's racist. That's telling.

The context is that he was talking specifically about the fact that these specific black women self-identified as DEI. So, at most, he was talking about these four women and DEI.

"If we'd claimed that (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) were all affirmative action picks, we'd have been called racist. But now they are saying it for us. They (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) are saying 'I am only here because of affirmative action'. Yah. We know. You (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) do not have the brain power to otherwise be taken seriously."

(BTW, four VERY PUBLIC women that he had ample opportunity to watch and form an opinion about the brainpower he was judging.)

Don't take my racist word for it. Here's another racist you can listen to.

Click to expand...

I find it hard to believe that ANY rational person could read the above commentary and/or watch that video and not think at the very least, "You know, he may actually have a point about that quote."

Much less say something like this:
luthervol said:
You think the logic is "Oh, so by your own admission you didn't have the brain power to get the the job on merit"?

It takes a pretty screwed up mind (maybe even racist) to think that is the logical conclusion.
Click to expand...

Again, here's the quote. I'll color code the correlation to my point.



"If we'd claimed that (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) were all affirmative action picks, we'd have been called racist. But now they are saying it for us. They (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) are saying 'I am only here because of affirmative action'. Yah. We know. You (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) do not have the brain power to otherwise be taken seriously."


Geez, folks. This shouldn't be that difficult!
 
#5,388
#5,388
BernardKingGOAT said:
I am not calling CK a racist though, but I do get how the flow of conversation can be muddled from post to post when discussing a hot topic
Click to expand...
I didn't call him racist either.
I distinctly said "maybe racist". As in, "it's not hard to see why some would interpret it as racist in the absence of a better defense of his (CK's) intentionally inflammatory and divisive conclusion."
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernardKingGOAT
#5,389
#5,389
luthervol said:
lol.....Still avoiding the "conclusion".
What type of mind would find that to be a logical conclusion???????

I don't know, absent any other defense, possibly a racist mind???
Click to expand...
Look above. I basically used crayon. The type of mind that can read/hear and process what they just read/heard in even the most basic ways.

Or, one that is not brainwashed to find racists in every shadow and corner.

Also, one that may have the slightest tendency to give someone the benefit of the doubt if given more than enough contextual reason to do so.

I'll understand if that's not you.
 
#5,390
#5,390
luthervol said:
I didn't call him racist either.
I distinctly said "maybe racist". As in, "it's not hard to see why some would interpret it as racist in the absence of a better defense of his (CK's) intentionally inflammatory and divisive conclusion."
Click to expand...
And I distinctly said that you played the "maybe racist card", which you then denied, and now admit.
 
#5,391
#5,391
n_huffhines said:
I don't understand why you would flat-out lie and make up a definition while calling me a liar. Are you alright, bro?


View attachment 774041

en.wikipedia.org

Remigration - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
Click to expand...


^^^ there is NOTHING in that which says " DEPORTING ALL NON WHITE PEOPLE" nor does it say anything about "3 generations of mexican Americans".

BOTH of those sentiments are YOURS only.

Its about DEPORTING the 15 to 20 million ILLEGALS that have no LEGAL status to be in our country.

Everything past that YOU made up. Period

*** never mind the fact that wiki is a garbage source.
 
#5,394
#5,394
Orange_Crush said:
I find it hard to believe that ANY rational person could read the above commentary and/or watch that video and not think at the very least, "You know, he may actually have a point about that quote."

Much less say something like this:


Again, here's the quote. I'll color code the correlation to my point.



"If we'd claimed that (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) were all affirmative action picks, we'd have been called racist. But now they are saying it for us. They (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) are saying 'I am only here because of affirmative action'. Yah. We know. You (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) do not have the brain power to otherwise be taken seriously."


Geez, folks. This shouldn't be that difficult!
Click to expand...
lol.....We're talking specifically about the part you failed to color code.
 
#5,396
#5,396
SpaceCoastVol said:
Then what's the objection to the military?
Click to expand...
Why would I advise my 18 year old to do something that risks their mental and physical health? Let’s ship you off to the Middle East because we miss handled things, and when you have PTSD it’s ok because we’ll give you some crappy healthcare

Now if they want to become a pilot I’d recommend the military though

My dad was military, I have quite a few friends that were also in or still in and grew up with some of my dad’s friends. Almost all of them have physical or mental problems
 
#5,397
#5,397
luthervol said:
lol.....We're talking specifically about the part you failed to color code.
Click to expand...
I know, and that's your problem.

I'm repeatedly talking about context, which you seem incapable or unwilling to consider. Again... The color-coded CONTEXT informs the part you guys want to hammer on OUT OF CONTEXT.

The fact that you refuse to consider that context explains why you would think someone may be a racist to read that CONETXT and summarize it well.

luthervol said:
You think the logic is "Oh, so by your own admission you didn't have the brain power to get the the job on merit"?

It takes a pretty screwed up mind (maybe even racist) to think that is the logical conclusion.
Click to expand...

"If we'd claimed that (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) were all affirmative action picks, we'd have been called racist. But now they are saying it for us. They (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) are saying 'I am only here because of affirmative action'. Yah. We know. You (these four women that I just specifically named, as opposed to generalizing) do not have the brain power to otherwise be taken seriously."
Click to expand...


Even in your brainwashed state, you seriously can't see the correlations between the quote and the summary? Sadly, I can't actually use crayons for you in this medium, so I'll leave you to your denials.

Good evening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cod
#5,399
#5,399
Smokey123 said:
Why would I advise my 18 year old to do something that risks their mental and physical health? Let’s ship you off to the Middle East because we miss handled things, and when you have PTSD it’s ok because we’ll give you some crappy healthcare

Now if they want to become a pilot I’d recommend the military though

My dad was military, I have quite a few friends that were also in or still in and grew up with some of my dad’s friends. Almost all of them have physical or mental problems
Click to expand...
There is so much wrong in this whole post I'm not even gonna try.

You win.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaybird_1981, ETV and malinoisvol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top