Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

Patel is the most underwhelming FBI director to hold the office since the agency’s creation.
It will be 50 years before the agency recovers from him. China and Russia have to be loving it.
 
So which was Charlie's true view? What he espoused on college campus debates, or what he espoused in front of church congregations?

Both, you can love the sinner and hate the sin.

It also depends on whether you are talking religiously or politically. In the context of the campus video he is talking in terms of politics. He even says, hey I funny are with it personally but there's room in the tent for you. In no way is either message at odds with the other.
 
This doesn’t add up in my head. I’m trying to make it make sense. A guy that had enough of a lack of conscience to steady himself and murder a man in front of thousands of people all the sudden develops so much of a conscience that he turns himself in?
Sometimes you cross a threshold that your conscious cannot process and place after the heat of the moment. Maybe he felt completely different than he thought after the fact...... Maybe he knew it was a matter of time and just wanted to get it over with..... Maybe he wanted the works to know it was him and bask in celebrity...... To many variables to know for sure right now.
 
This doesn’t add up in my head. I’m trying to make it make sense. A guy that had enough of a lack of conscience to steady himself and murder a man in front of thousands of people all the sudden develops so much of a conscience that he turns himself in?

Where’s he going to hide? You think the videos you’ve seen is all they have?
 
My post is to show his views aligned with God's views. Direct from scripture.
I think there's a difference between seeing what certain people believe vs what they espouse to do about their beliefs. For instance if X religion believes Y religion is wrong for Z reasons that's really not a surprise given the context. Nobody should believe harm should come to those that don't believe as they do. As long as Kirk's (though it could be anyone) beliefs are consistent with the source material what are you gonna do? You can disagree of course but that's about it. Now all that changes when whoever starts not just saying what they believe about X but negative things should happen to those on the wrong side of they're beliefs. Citing "look what Kirk believed that's consistent with his religion" really isn't a particularly big flex.

I didn't really keep up with Kirk. Did he ever actually condone harm coming to gays/trans/etc? That would have much more traction.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top