hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 120,622
- Likes
- 177,923
I'm still in favor of it 1) for the most heinous of murders and 2) the evidence is incontrovertible (e.g., not merely beyond a reasonable doubt). I don't have an issue with someone like Timothy McVeigh, the Sandy Hook shooter had he survived, Dylann Roof, or this guy receiving it.
How can evidence be incontrovertible when the state is the source of most all evidence against a person?