Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

[UTFanForLife]

Why did they arrest that old man? What gave the police reason to rest that man

According to the press conference I saw, it was for obstruction of justice. Further details were not given.

 

[Hairy Vols]

If caring more about kids being gunned down than political activists makes me a douche, then I guess I'm a douche. But what does that make you?

The real problem here is timing. To turn a man’s deathbed into your political chair isn’t discourse, it’s exploitation. This forum has endless opportunities for self-expression and sharing opinions. Choosing the moment of someone’s passing to do it doesn’t show empathy; it exposes the emptiness of the cause you claim to care about. You are using a sad cause of someone else to drive your political narrative.


My wife and I have a saying: “When one of us brings up a problem and the other changes the subject to something we did in the past, that’s not solving anything, it’s just dodging responsibility.”

 

[apevol]

anybody know who was asking kirk the question?

 

[Vol8188]

I'm not celebrating anything.

Really? What was your intent when sharing articles about him advocating for the second amendment on the day of his murder?

 

[volsforever27]

Charlie won the debate, that’s why he was killed.

Those whining about his rhetoric should realize Charlie was very laid back and civil. He was vanilla. The next one probably won’t be.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Someone needs to take Patel’s phone away. You don’t have to give updates. Just let everyone know when you actually have the right suspect(s) in custody.

Well, after all he is a DEI hire!!

(I just couldn’t pass that one up)

 

[Hairy Vols]

I would have once agreed with you; but I’m done. Poor Mr. Kirk never changed any of his opponents’ minds as far as I can tell. And in the end; they shot him for his trouble.

When MLK was shot, if those seeking equality thought as you do now this country would have fallen into chaos and neither of us would be here today.

 

[JOEY’S ALL VOL !!!]

Dowd’s 15 minutes of fame should shortly be coming to a self inflicted end.

MSNBC President Apologizes For Comments Made By Political Analyst Matthew Dowd After Charlie Kirk Shooting

In coverage of the Charlie Kirk shooting, commentator Matthew Dowd had said that hateful words lead to hateful actions.

deadline.com

Maybe, maybe not. There seem to be enough out there that seem to not care or even go as far as to support idiots like him. But yes, he should by all means be shown the door for his unbridled stupidity.

 

[Buddy’s Bandit]

anybody know who was asking kirk the question?

Exactly, that is a person I think needs to be interrogated.

 

[sjt18]

Jump forward about 5 minutes to see the rhetoric that caused this:

 

[luthervol]

Why are we still arguing and discussing anything with people who hate us? They are too far gone in their path of hatred to be reasoned with.

Dialogue is no longer possible. It’s time for organization and raw political power. Donate, volunteer, vote. Work hard until not a single democrat holds any office anywhere in the country. You can’t reason with madmen.

lol......you're actually serious.

 

[Orangeburst]

who is the left equivalent of CK?

 

[McDad]

These videos need to be played over and over to show how evil and wicked the left is.

You are wrong. The left isn't wicked because the left isn't homogeneous. Evil isnt made better by exalting it.

 

[Buddy’s Bandit]

who is the left equivalent of CK?

No one.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Maybe, maybe not. There seem to be enough out there that seem to not care or even go as far as to support idiots like him. But yes, he should by all means be shown the door for his unbridled stupidity.

Terry Moran was cut loose for I’d say much less objectionable material.

 

[apevol]

Exactly, that is a person I think needs to be interrogated.

it may be nothing and i may be overthinking it, but it felt eerie

 

[Matt2496]

Im sure this has already been shared, but suspect is still at large.

 

[Flogballs]

.

 

[PowerT.]

Im sure this has already been shared, but suspect is still at large.

Unbelievable

For the families sake I hope this is done in 24 hours. Period

 

[apevol]

My wife and I have a saying: “When one of us brings up a problem and the other changes the subject to something we did in the past, that’s not solving anything, it’s just dodging responsibility.”

that has been a major thorn in the side of every romantic relationship I've ever had

 

[SagginVawls]

Ignore list filled up. Anyone that tries to justify this is trash.

 

[bpalmer28]

He strengthened the opinions of those who agreed with him. I don’t think he ever changed one of the blue haired banshees

wrong

 

[Hairy Vols]

who is the left equivalent of CK?

The left, historically, does not consume media in the same way the right does. For as long as I can remember, the right has always rallied behind a few champion voices at any given time. O’Reilly, Beck, Shapiro, and the list goes on. The left, by contrast, tends to spread their political news consumption across broader outlets and figures. They rely heavily on mainstream networks like CNN or MSNBC, digital platforms like Vox and Huffington Post, and commentary spread across podcasts, YouTube channels, and social media feeds. Instead of rallying around one or two dominant personalities, their attention is divided across a wider range of sources and collective voices.

 

[dobre_shunka]

"This is fault of Trump and the Jan 6 Capitol riot" to paraphrase the governor of Illinois

 

[McDad]

The left, historically, does not consume media in the same way the right does. For as long as I can remember, the right has always rallied behind a few champion voices at any given time. O’Reilly, Beck, Shapiro, and the list goes on. The left, by contrast, tends to spread their political news consumption across broader outlets and figures. They rely heavily on mainstream networks like CNN or MSNBC, digital platforms like Vox and Huffington Post, and commentary spread across podcasts, YouTube channels, and social media feeds. Instead of rallying around one or two dominant personalities, their attention is divided across a wider range of sources and collective voices.

Wonder why that is?