Charlie Kirk Shot and killed

#6,802
#6,802
BreatheUT said:
It is the utopia of progressive liberalism. They don't have a destination. It's an evermoving object with no basis but disruption. Right and wrong is partially explained as right and wrong of the times and what is popular to attain power. Its rooted in opinion. It's what happens with people, good and bad, replace God with other things like government.
Click to expand...
As Nietzsche pointed out, once you kill God, you lose more than you ever intended when He's gone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#6,806
#6,806
CubsFanTN said:
Brandon is an awesome guy, but he’s way down on the list that includes Shapiro, Walsh, Knowles, Kirk, Rubin, etc. Conservative politics is a desirable field to get into and has been for 10+ years.
Click to expand...
I get he's not the most popular in the group. But...why, specifically, is no one here or in media attacking him for the exact same views Kirk debates in public. Tatum is just as vocal and open about those exact same issues. Why do they avoid him and only attack Kirk's character??
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols and Orange_Crush
#6,811
#6,811
n_huffhines said:
Where are you getting that he said he is "too pro Jewish?" I don't remember that and I tried to find it searching the article for keywords, and I cannot find it. Are you extrapolating all that from the bit about being "unconcerned about...the humanity of Palestinians." Because that does not contradict the other thing.

Off the deep end? Maybe because Kirk himself was off the rails? Hard to argue that he wasn't saying something prejudiced here by saying Jewish people are responsible for anti-whiteness.

“Jewish donors,” Kirk claimed, were “the number one funding mechanism of radical open-border, neoliberal, quasi-Marxist policies, cultural institutions, and nonprofits.” Indeed, “the philosophical foundation of anti-whiteness has been largely financed by Jewish donors in the country.”

What do you think about this @MAD ?

I'm kidding. It's rhetorical. I already know you don't care if somebody says something antisemitic as long as they are Zionists.
Click to expand...
if you click thru the links they include many of them go to other opinion pieces pointing out how favorable Kirk is to the Jews, and how racist to Palestine that makes him. and it relies on the presumption that being unconcerned about something means you harbor negative feelings about that thing. could just be literal indifference and they don't provide enough information to make a judgement call.

if you/anyone think Charlie Kirk actually represents the deep end, or represented actual naziism/fascism yall are going to miss the real examples. like I was getting into with another poster here, using politically charged terms incorrectly is probably what lead to Charlie Kirk getting dead. and instead of recognizing and pushing the fact it never should have gotten to that point, no matter what you think of Kirk; they double down on the dangerous rhetoric they claim to be against.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey123, marcusluvsvols and whodeycin85
#6,813
#6,813
GVF said:
I get he's not the most popular in the group. But...why, specifically, is no one here or in media attacking him for the exact same views Kirk debates in public. Tatum is just as vocal and open about those exact same issues. Why do they avoid him and only attack Kirk's character??
Click to expand...
Probably because it's been a bad look, calling people of color 'racist', 'Uncle Tom", and 'House N______', though there has been quite a bit of that in the past.
 
#6,814
#6,814
I was reading an article this morning and noticed Tyler Robinson has been charged with two counts of witness tampering. I know one is for asking Lance to delete messages, does anyone know what the other is for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#6,815
#6,815
LouderVol said:
if you click thru the links they include many of them go to other opinion pieces pointing out how favorable Kirk is to the Jews, and how racist to Palestine that makes him. and it relies on the presumption that being unconcerned about something means you harbor negative feelings about that thing. could just be literal indifference and they don't provide enough information to make a judgement call.

if you/anyone think Charlie Kirk actually represents the deep end, or represented actual naziism/fascism yall are going to miss the real examples. like I was getting into with another poster here, using politically charged terms incorrectly is probably what lead to Charlie Kirk getting dead. and instead of recognizing and pushing the fact it never should have gotten to that point, no matter what you think of Kirk; they double down on the dangerous rhetoric they claim to be against.
Click to expand...
THe pattern of hte platform. When the election was lost, they did not seek to understand why they lost. They trluy felt they just didn't push far enough and doubled down, failing to see the platform, or lack thereof, is why they are loing people in droves.
 
#6,816
#6,816
InVOLuntary said:
The Dallas shooting was Obama inspired police hate. When was a political figure assassinated or attempted assassination?
Click to expand...
Lol, I don't give two craps for politicians, on either side. or really any public figure. the loss of innocent civilians bothers me far more.

sovereign citizens aren't fans of Obama. if you are going to be that loose trying to lump people together be careful or the right is going to end up with a lot of the islamic terrorist killings because they were "right inspired gay hate".

Hortman was killed, pelosi's husband was attacked and the attacked made it clear he was there for Nancy. even though it was staged there was the plot to kidnap Michigans governor by people on the right that I don't think can be ignored.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DuckInAPen and EasternVol
#6,817
#6,817
whodeycin85 said:
What better place to discuss things then an open anonymous forum???
Click to expand...
Luther 101 act like Confucius, refuse to be nailed down on anything concrete. Act high and mighty for being an “educator” (like it’s an impossible thing to be) and he even threw in the “I’ve never heard of Kirk before” BS he did with Michael Brown story years ago 😂

He’s predictable I’ll give him that
 
  • Like
Reactions: GroverCleveland, TrumpedUpVol and whodeycin85
#6,818
#6,818
Rickyvol77 said:
Luther 101 act like Confucius, refuse to be nailed down on anything concrete. Act high and mighty for being an “educator” (like it’s an impossible thing to be) and he even threw in the “I’ve never heard of Kirk before” BS he did with Michael Brown story years ago 😂

He’s predictable I’ll give him that
Click to expand...
Confucius says, 'A man with an itchy butt will wake with a stinky finger'.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT, marcusluvsvols and Rickyvol77
#6,821
#6,821
LouderVol said:
this is now at least the 3rd or 4th time someone has made the claim "the last conversation I had with Kirk was about this subject". its possible, but seems unlikely.
Click to expand...

Huff is sharing it because he and Tucker share a known distain for the people of the Old Testament.
 
#6,823
#6,823
GVF said:
THe pattern of hte platform. When the election was lost, they did not seek to understand why they lost. They trluy felt they just didn't push far enough and doubled down, failing to see the platform, or lack thereof, is why they are loing people in droves.
Click to expand...
I think the right is one election away from this too.

Trump has been pushing further and further away from the conservative core that built his support. its fine for him, but for the right in general its going to be problematic.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top