Charleston Church Shooting Suspect Dylann Roof Captured

Not necessarily. It was more highlighting how ****ty that post was in relation to the discussion at hand.

One of those people murdered 9 innocents out of pure, racial hatred. One of those did not.

That's where your post ****s up. You're using a recent tragedy to spread your fringe talking points like an ideological herpes, and that's bothersome.


You should pay attention to the way AO responds to a post. He addressed the issue like an adult. Not someone whose only way to interact with other people is to try and degrade them to give them self some self worth. You are a internet bully dink. I don't know if you do it on purpose or if it's simply a defense mechanism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
You should pay attention to the way AO responds to a post. He addressed the issue like an adult. Not someone whose only way to interact with other people is to try and degrade them to give them self some self worth. You are a internet bully dink. I don't know if you do it on purpose or if it's simply a defense mechanism.

Is my name agentorange?

He simply came at your idea from a different angle. He hasn't been reading your posts as long as I have. Maybe I'm getting tired of the way you carry on with your obstinate discourse; your short, unexplained answers, and this "I'll just leave this here" bull**** you've been pulling lately.

The only people who use the term "internet bully" are the ones with skins too thin to take a bit of honest criticism. I do it here every day. You can too. Sack up and address my post or move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Okay, so, lets imagine that some radical democrats decided to start displaying Weather Underground and communist iconography on state grounds.

I wouldn't blame you for taking issue with it. It's fine if some loon like Pacer92 want to wear Che shirts and hang their soviet flags. I just don't think it's really sending the right message for state or federal property to endorse the message behind those symbols by displaying them on state/federal property.

That's all this is about. I don't feel white guilt for the Confederacy the same as I don't feel it for the Germans or Soviets and what they did in WW2. I don't feel guilty for slavery.

I simply feel that it's time for these symbols that are from that era to be relegated to museums and private display if one is so inclined.

Ayers and Roof are both despicable humans.


I actually agree on most of this. I do disagree with the grouping of state and federal. They don't even belong in the same sentence when talking about this issue. The Fed should stay way away from this and this should be an individual states decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Is my name agentorange?

He simply came at your idea from a different angle. He hasn't been reading your posts as long as I have. Maybe I'm getting tired of the way you carry on with your discourse; your short, unexplained answers, and this "I'll just leave this here" bull**** you've been pulling lately.

The only people who use the term "internet bully" are the ones with skins to thin to take a bit of honest criticism. Nut up and address my post or move on.


And yet again, the same tribe of a post.


Your response earlier was not founded and needed no response. Any I gave simply would have fueled your discourse you have with me.

My posts that I "leave here" are directed to people that I know are smart enough to understand the correlation. I'm sorry if you don't see that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I actually agree on most of this. I do disagree with the grouping of state and federal. They don't even belong in the same sentence when talking about this issue. The Fed should stay way away from this and this should be an individual states decision.

Agreed. Golfballs stated the same earlier. Let the state(s) decide.
 
I actually agree on most of this. I do disagree with the grouping of state and federal. They don't even belong in the same sentence when talking about this issue. The Fed should stay way away from this and this should be an individual states decision.

I don't think this should be a fed issue or an issue worth voting on.

I simply don't see why it's there in the first place. There's no historical context that ties the flag and the building together. As far as I'm concerned, it makes as much sense as putting a flag bearing a stale turd on the front lawn of that building.

Aside from that, it is a hot issue symbol for many. A government building shouldn't be taking sides in that debate by placing that flag there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
And yet again, the same tribe of a post.


Your response earlier was not founded and needed no response. Any I gave simply would have fueled your discourse you have with me.

My posts that I "leave here" are directed to people that I know are smart enough to understand the correlation. I'm sorry if you don't see that.

No, you leave posts like that laying around because it's all too easy to regurgitate someone else's thoughts and refuse to elaborate on them at the risk of exposing your inability to form your own, coherent argument.

I addressed your (lacking) correlation. One of them is a murderer, beyond any reasonable doubt.

That aside, you're taking a fringe activist from nearly a half century ago and comparing his alleged crimes to someone who, again, beyond any reasonable doubt, murdered 9 people a few days ago.

What's your point?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I don't think this should be a fed issue or an issue worth voting on.

I simply don't see why it's there in the first place. There's no historical context that ties the flag and the building together. As far as I'm concerned, it makes as much sense as putting a flag bearing a stale turd on the front lawn of that building.

Aside from that, it is a hot issue symbol for many. A government building shouldn't be taking sides in that debate by placing that flag there.

The flag has been there since 1961.................
 
Okay, so, lets imagine that some radical democrats decided to start displaying Weather Underground and communist iconography on state grounds.

I wouldn't blame you for taking issue with it. It's fine if some loon like Pacer92 want to wear Che shirts and hang their soviet flags. I just don't think it's really sending the right message for state or federal property to endorse the message behind those symbols by displaying them on state/federal property.

That's all this is about. I don't feel white guilt for the Confederacy the same as I don't feel it for the Germans or Soviets and what they did in WW2. I don't feel guilty for slavery.

I simply feel that it's time for these symbols that are from that era to be relegated to museums and private display if one is so inclined.

Ayers and Roof are both despicable humans.

Or imagine some radical democrat starting his political career in the living room of the leader of the Weather Underground..... oh wait that did happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
And?

EDIT: for the sake of Burhead's asinine correction in the genesis of this thread, it's been there since 2000, actually.

well it was moved from the Capitol to where it is now in 2000, yes.

For the "and" part, it was placed there during the Civil War Centennial (which was started by Eisenhower and left up to the States) in 1961. It has been there since then moved in 2000. The historical context that ties the flag and the building together is that the building is a civil war memorial.....is it not?

As for Mississippi's flag..............Dont really care, hell mississippi is a ****hole so whatever they want to do is fine by me.
 
well it was moved from the Capitol to where it is now in 2000, yes.

For the "and" part, it was placed there during the Civil War Centennial (which was started by Eisenhower and left up to the States) in 1961. It has been there since then moved in 2000. The historical context that ties the flag and the building together is that the building is a civil war memorial.....is it not?

As for Mississippi's flag..............Dont really care, hell mississippi is a ****hole so whatever they want to do is fine by me.

To be honest, South Carolina has the worst drivers in the entire country.
 
What a country, less than one week since these poor innocent people were murdered by an evil monster and all the country cares about is a damn flag.
 
Some of y'all need to spend some time in Dallas.

I go there sometimes. Texas drivers are pretty bad (worst ones are here because UT and daddies buying their adorable daughters EFFING YUKONS), but there's something about SC. They're borderline retarded behind a wheel.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top