Centralized Control: WHO Treaty & Amendments Unleash Tedros as Health Dictator of the World

[BigOrangeTrain]

What is crasy is the United States is actually the one who recommended the amendment. In January of 2022 the United States submitted proposed amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations, which bind all 194 UN member states, which the WHO director general accepted and forwarded to other member states. In contrast to amendments to our own constitution, these amendments will not require a two-thirds vote of our Senate, but a simple majority of the member states.

A good question everyone should be asking is is this treason. Personally, I think it is. Nobody can call this a conspiracy theory. It's all out there for the world to see but the media refuses to even report on this.

I don’t know if it officially constitutes treason but I agree it should. And like I said, if all this happens then Biden and his followers in the government need to be publicly executed.

 

[VolinWayne]

This is huge news! I saw this reported this morning in IFA but had to go 7 pages deep in Google search to find anything at all about the 13 Amendments that Biden recommended. Apparantly there are enough leaders in place who feel like many of us do and are aware of the dangers these 13 amendments would bring to sovereignty and to our constitution. What is also apparant is how Google actively plays a roll in forming narratives simply by hiding certain subjects. Many people will claim that this is "a conspiracy" simply because mainstream media hasn't covered it.

WHO Withdraws 12 of Biden’s “Sovereignty” Amendments to IHR; May Revisit Them Later

The global backlash against the proposed amendments to the WHO’s International Health Treaty (IHR) — which would have ceded national sovereignty over to globalists — along with legal actions in the United Kingdom have resulted in almost all of those amendments being dropped for the time being. There is nothing, however, to prevent the global overlords from revisiting the agenda.


https://theparadise.ng/who-withdraw...nty-amendments-to-ihr-may-revisit-them-later/

 

[NurseGoodVol]

I have seen very little coverage of this by the media and finally Tucker did a segment on this subject. Amni being crasy for being concerned about this?

The language looks pretty soft in the wording but there are hard limits the WHO can place on non conforming governments. Yes they can send their people in, not sure what type of enforcement mechanism they are planning on using.

 

[LouderVol]

We are not powerless. You have your vote. Use it and cast it wisely. This is one area where there IS actually a difference between the two parties

Yeah it's really not. If this was some global power on fighting Muslim terrorists there would be a lot of GOP support for it.

They are all socialists/globalists. It just has to be THEIR version of it.

 

[LouderVol]

The language looks pretty soft in the wording but there are hard limits the WHO can place on non conforming governments. Yes they can send their people in, not sure what type of enforcement mechanism they are planning on using.

They wouldnt need to be overt enough to send in foreigners to enforce laws here in the US. They will just use our existing forces here. Or maybe the CDC finally gets it's own military branch or armed enforcement division. You know to keep people safe with the millions in dollars of money that goes to them for weapons.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

They wouldnt need to be overt enough to send in foreigners to enforce laws here in the US. They will just use our existing forces here. Or maybe the CDC finally gets it's own military branch or armed enforcement division. You know to keep people safe with the millions in dollars of money that goes to them for weapons.

They better be careful. Whatever guise they are trying to sell it under, I’m not buying.

 

[Ttucke11]

Tucker is almost right but then makes it completely wrong. If this is a treaty then it would require our representative govt to ratify it. That is consent. If you don't like it then vote better

Yay I get to vote for the richest person who can front a campaign, or a select few members of the GOP or Democrats who are pushed to forefront.

The two parties have way too much power, and the populace is too unaware of anything to vote for any 3rd party candidates.

 

[happy-go_vol]

We are not powerless. You have your vote. Use it and cast it wisely. This is one area where there IS actually a difference between the two parties

That's when you need a strong local gov that will ignore the mandates. If the local gov and police doesn't enforce it, then it would be null. Hopefully it doesn't get to that point, but it eventually will

 

[OrangeTsar]

That's when you need a strong local gov that will ignore the mandates. If the local gov and police doesn't enforce it, then it would be null. Hopefully it doesn't get to that point, but it eventually will

And that’s when Biden or whoever else sends in the Feds. You have to defeat the Dems in every election from President all the way down to your city council. There is no hiding when they possess power

 

[VolinWayne]

Far-Reaching US Amendments to WHO Regulations, Global Pandemic Treaty Raise Concerns: Journalist Far-Reaching US Amendments to WHO Regulations, Global Pandemic Treaty Raise Concerns: Journalist

U.S.-proposed amendments to the international health regulations which govern response to pandemics and the new global pandemic treaty, both on the agenda of the World Health Organization’s general meeting, pose a threat to countries’ sovereignty, said journalist and author Nick Corbishley.

The amendments proposed in January by the Biden administration will give the Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) unilateral authority to declare a public health emergency in any nation based on whatever evidence the director chooses.

The 13 amendments put forward by the Biden administration were on the agenda of the 75th World Health Assembly held last week in Geneva, Switzerland. The World Health Assembly is the decision-making body of the WHO and is attended by delegations from all member states, according to the organization’s website.

The global pandemic treaty is a parallel mechanism of the WHO. It will have force under international law and is very similar to the International Health Regulations’ amendments, but it will give far more power to the WHO and its director-general, Bell said.

Currently, the WHO “only has an advisory role. It’s only able to make recommendations to member states and it is up to the participating nations to decide whether and how they implement those recommendations,” Corbishley explained. “That is likely to change if there is a global pandemic treaty. ”

Corbishley believes that the assembly will focus more on compliance of WHO member states with regulations adopted by the organization. The Biden administration mentioned setting up a compliance committee that will ensure that WHO participants follow its regulations, Corbishley told EpochTV’s “Crossroads” program.

He pointed out that the concept of a compliance committee if implemented, will be “almost like to police the actions of each member state.

 

[VolinWayne]

I guess we are supposed to all just turn a blind eye to this guys history and pretend it didn't happen. This is the person who we are supposed to trust to lead the World Health Organization.

 

[VolinWayne]

Despite a setback at the World Health Organization’s 75th annual meeting in Geneva in late May, the push to further empower the United Nations agency is moving ahead, remaining a major threat to U.S. national sovereignty and self-government, according to leading experts.

Following some minor changes to the International Health Regulations (IHR) approved at the recent WHO meeting, the U.N. health organization and its member governments are working on new, far-reaching amendments to the global rules. Those will be submitted in September.

After Setback for WHO, Agency Now Working on Far-Reaching Amendments to the Global Rules