Can anybody explain the call on that punt?

#3
#3
I thought when the first guy ran by and touched it at the 1 it was a dead ball. Apparently not?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#4
#4
To me it looked like McDowell touched it short of the goal line and the SC guy kicked it in the endzone, should have been down at the 1.
 
#5
#5
So it can't be a UT TD since UT touched it first. I believe because McDowell was touching the ball as he slid into the endzone, they ruled it a touchback. The contact after was irrelevant. Someone correct me if I understood incorrectly.
 
#12
#12
I guess bottom line you have to question why McDowell thought he could make that play sliding when the ball was dead at the 1. It was an amazing punt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#13
#13
Yes...instead of just running down to the football and just bending over and lightly touching it while it's just sitting there, we have poorly coached players that slide to the ball and give the officials and replay guys a reason to call it a touchback.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#14
#14
So it can't be a UT TD since UT touched it first. I believe because McDowell was touching the ball as he slid into the endzone, they ruled it a touchback. The contact after was irrelevant. Someone correct me if I understood incorrectly.

I don't think it matters where McDowell is as long as the ball doesn't cross.
 
#18
#18
Ref didn't blow it dead after our first guy touched it and before McDowell hit it. It was still a live ball because the whistle wasn't blown I believe.
 
#20
#20
Yes...instead of just running down to the football and just bending over and lightly touching it while it's just sitting there, we have poorly coached players that slide to the ball and give the officials and replay guys a reason to call it a touchback.

The ball didn't cross the goal line til the sc player kicked it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#21
#21
That's ok. The SEC will admit that the refs blew the call....on Monday morning.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top