SayUWantAreVOLution
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2019
- Messages
- 9,153
- Likes
- 11,216
Could there be a path to ownership? Sure. But asking for ownership before you step on the field as a pro is just stupid. What if he's a bust and out of the league in 5 years? Wouldn't be the first time.
If that becomes a trend for players, eventually the owner would negotiate control away like death by a thousand paper cuts until the "owner" no longer controls a majority of the equity.Could there be a path to ownership? Sure. But asking for ownership before you step on the field as a pro is just stupid. What if he's a bust and out of the league in 5 years? Wouldn't be the first time.
In the article referenced in the tweet, they bring up "collusion" if the owners prevent this without negotiating with the players union.I said something similar in another thread, but I would guess the owners are emailing each other right now agreeing that they will vote ASAP to eliminate all in kind negotiations with rookie contracts, if that doesn't already exist. They capped rookie contracts for a reason (nearly 15 years ago we had $70m guaranteed to Sam Bradford??? as I recall), and they're not going to let this fly.