Bye Bye Louisville

[volfanhill]

The rights and protection of the citizen should always be more important then the protection of the police.

 

[BUBear]

The drug aspect is the entire reason for them going to the residence. It is a significant matter.

Drugs aren't a problem... every three year old kid should get hooked on them. I'm sure you agree

 

[BUBear]

The rights and protection of the citizen should always be more important then the protection of the police.

Let's defund every police department and we can see how that works out

 

[volfanhill]

Let's define every police department and we can see how that works out

What does that mean?

 

[Weezer]

That’s true and has to do with protocol and the war on drugs.... we do need changes in those areas.... not charging the cops with murder seems pretty obvious they are not guilty based on the evidence that we know about.

And I've not called for charging the cops, at least not for murder. But there needs to be systemic changes.

 

[n_huffhines]

 

[BUBear]

What does that mean?

*Autocorrect but you know what it meant...or maybe not

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Drugs aren't a problem... every three year old kid should get hooked on them. I'm sure you agree

18th Amendment... and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

 

[Weezer]

Okay, so if the BF didn't hear them identify, would he be charged with murder if he had killed one of the cops? All he knows is someone has just busted down his door. He thinks he's defending himself. So if he had killed one, would it be fair to charge him?

 

[BUBear]

18th Amendment... and contributing to the delinquency of a minor.

That's why they cops were there.

 

[Weezer]

View attachment 308646

The one part of that statement I fully support is voting out all Republicans and Democrats. I'm all for abolishing both. Unfortunately, it won't happen.

 

[BUBear]

You thinking those drugs were only going to adults???

 

[cHiZzLeVOL]

Okay, so if the BF didn't hear them identify, would he be charged with murder if he had killed one of the cops? All he knows is someone has just busted down his door. He thinks he's defending himself. So if he had killed one, would it be fair to charge him?

Depends. What kind of state laws does Kentucky have regarding individuals being able to protect their house?

It is my impression that the state follows “Castle Doctrine” so if there is reasonable proof that he did not know they were police officers and one police officer died technically per castle doctrine he could not be charged.

 

[BUBear]

Okay, so if the BF didn't hear them identify, would he be charged with murder if he had killed one of the cops? All he knows is someone has just busted down his door. He thinks he's defending himself. So if he had killed one, would it be fair to charge him?

He should be. Did the cops force him to get wasted?

 

[Weezer]

He should be. Did the cops force him to get wasted?

He was in his own home. He's allowed to drink in his own home, and he's allowed to defend that home.

 

[Weezer]

Okay, done with the arguing. An innocent woman died. Anything and everything should be done to prevent that from happening again. Everyone should agree with that.

 

[BUBear]

He was in his own home. He's allowed to drink in his own home, and he's allowed to defend that home.

Not exactly true

 

[VolsAgainstTheWorld15]

Where do you pull this "all" from?

Colin Kaepernick speaks on Breonna Taylor shooting indictment: 'Abolish The Police'
This is specifically what I'm speaking about. People with a platform such as Kaepernick should be far more careful with their words than this. Whether it was his intention or not, he painted all cops as white supremacist bad guys. That puts a target on their backs and will lead to more police being shot.

 

[BUBear]

He was in his own home. He's allowed to drink in his own home, and he's allowed to defend that home.

He was welcomed there but it wasn't his home... that's where the problems came in

 

[Electric Orange]

Never trust anyone who claims to speak for how everyone should feel.

 

[BUBear]

He was in his own home. He's allowed to drink in his own home, and he's allowed to defend that home.

Ten bucks tells me you don't know where his home is

 

[AM64]

Not exactly true

Which part? And even if someone showed up yelled "Police" and started to beat down the door, how do you know they were actually cops? The best answer is simply not to break down a door except to save a life - and by the time the door is breached, the life may have been taken anyway.

 

[AM64]

He was welcomed there but it wasn't his home... that's where the problems came in

A guest in a home should enjoy the same protections as the owner. By definition you could be implying a child or extended family member doesn't have the same right as a parent when it comes to the castle doctrine.

 

[BUBear]

He was in his own home. He's allowed to drink in his own home, and he's allowed to defend that home.

Even money says he wasn't selling drugs to kids. It's even money bro... you scared???

 

[NEO]

Meh, I'm still focused on why in the hell are we kicking down downs to enforce these sill azz drug laws...

This is a good point.