Even going 8-4 means THREE (3) of those wins are against total patsy programs. Add Vandy and Kentucky and that means 5 of those wins were against basically bottom feeder, nothing programs.
Is that really a reason to celebrate a 3rd yr head coach? Is that really accomplishing anything worth anything?
Is UT had Vandy's history of being a bottom feeder then maybe this would seem great.
What's happening with UT would NEVER be acceptable to any of the other major programs who are in the top ten of winning all time. Now, those programs have all gone through tough times but it is NEVER as acceptable as it is in Knoxville.
If losing but coming close is so "okay" with everyone then why the heck did Fulmer get canned? A guy who brought a National Championship and .750 winning %, played for UT and was more of aVFL than anyone could ever hope to be... couldn't even get two bad years before he was being pilloried and burned at the stake, yet people do backflips and somersaults to excuse a coach from Cincinnati.
Phil would've gotten a contract extension for 8 wins. Phil had losing seasons two out of his last 4 years. What's your point?