- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 95,070
- Likes
- 67,559
I really do think Gore would have been much better than either of the other two you mention. Whether he's right on environmental issues, or a hipocrite about them, whatever, you have to think he would have handled the Mid-East a whole lot better than Bush or Kerry and perhaps not given the oil producing nations there such an incentive to keep production levels so low in the face of increasing demand.
I always wondered about Gore but seeing his post-election behavior really convinced me he would not be any better. Couple that with his need to be in the spotlight with GW, no matter that his data is off, and I completely disagree about him. Plus the guy was so smart that he avoided his home state in 2000 that could have won him the election. I'd still love to hear how Kerry would have saved us