BTO’s Kentucky postgame report

#128
#128
bleedingTNorange said:
Vanderbilt has been out all year, as has Baker, no?

We had at least 3 wth the flu also?

How many scholarship players played double digit minutes for UK? 8. How many did Tennessee have? 7. STFU!
Click to expand...

Still not the best at reading comprehension Bleeding. I never said anything about UT. I said that we had 2 who have been hurt all year. I said the other plays very limited anyway. It wasn't the end of the world...but you bring it up so I'm going to correct you.
 
Last edited:
#129
#129
littlecat said:
still not the best at reading comprehension at bleeding. I never said anything about ut. I said that we had 2 who have been hurt all year. I said the other plays very limited anyway. It wasn't the end of the world...but you bring it up so i'm going to correct you.
Click to expand...
IMG_7022.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#131
#131
Losing to UT/Barnes in Knoxville is no biggie for Cal. He's doing his friend a favor by helping him keep his job.

UT is no threat to Cal and KY so it's a harmless gesture by Cal.

Cal will make sure that UT doesn't win in Lexington. That would be taking their friendship a bit too far.

Wouldn't doubt Cal referring some second tier players to Barnes and UT.

Bottom Line -- UT and Barnes aren't significant opponents for Cal and UK. They live in different strata of college basketball.

They may have gotten together before the game and plotted their double technical extravaganza similar to what one often sees at wrestling events.
 
#132
#132
1200DPI said:
Losing to UT/Barnes in Knoxville is no biggie for Cal. He's doing his friend a favor by helping him keep his job.

UT is no threat to Cal and KY so it's a harmless gesture by Cal.

Cal will make sure that UT doesn't win in Lexington. That would be taking their friendship a bit too far.

Wouldn't doubt Cal referring some second tier players to Barnes and UT.

Bottom Line -- UT and Barnes aren't significant opponents for Cal and UK. They live in different strata of college basketball.

They may have gotten together before the game and plotted their double technical extravaganza similar to what one often sees at wrestling events.
Click to expand...
:crazy:
 
#133
#133
1200DPI said:
Losing to UT/Barnes in Knoxville is no biggie for Cal. He's doing his friend a favor by helping him keep his job.

UT is no threat to Cal and KY so it's a harmless gesture by Cal.

Cal will make sure that UT doesn't win in Lexington. That would be taking their friendship a bit too far.

Wouldn't doubt Cal referring some second tier players to Barnes and UT.

Bottom Line -- UT and Barnes aren't significant opponents for Cal and UK. They live in different strata of college basketball.

They may have gotten together before the game and plotted their double technical extravaganza similar to what one often sees at wrestling events.
Click to expand...

:eek:lol:
 
#134
#134
1200DPI said:
Losing to UT/Barnes in Knoxville is no biggie for Cal. He's doing his friend a favor by helping him keep his job.

UT is no threat to Cal and KY so it's a harmless gesture by Cal.

Cal will make sure that UT doesn't win in Lexington. That would be taking their friendship a bit too far.

Wouldn't doubt Cal referring some second tier players to Barnes and UT.

Bottom Line -- UT and Barnes aren't significant opponents for Cal and UK. They live in different strata of college basketball.

They may have gotten together before the game and plotted their double technical extravaganza similar to what one often sees at wrestling events.
Click to expand...

https://kentucky.forums.rivals.com/forums/rupp-rafters-basketball-forum.26/

These threads say otherwise.
 
#135
#135
Cal doesn't care about fan forum commentary. It's background noise and irrelevant to him and his program.

He's King in Lexington. Fans are a penny a dozen.
 
#136
#136
1200DPI said:
Losing to UT/Barnes in Knoxville is no biggie for Cal. He's doing his friend a favor by helping him keep his job.

UT is no threat to Cal and KY so it's a harmless gesture by Cal.

Cal will make sure that UT doesn't win in Lexington. That would be taking their friendship a bit too far.

Wouldn't doubt Cal referring some second tier players to Barnes and UT.

Bottom Line -- UT and Barnes aren't significant opponents for Cal and UK. They live in different strata of college basketball.

They may have gotten together before the game and plotted their double technical extravaganza similar to what one often sees at wrestling events.
Click to expand...

When did Mrs Calipari join VolNation?
 
#137
#137
LittleCat said:
Still not the best at reading comprehension Bleeding. I never said anything about UT. I said that we had 2 who have been hurt all year. I said the other plays very limited anyway. It wasn't the end of the world...but you bring it up so I'm going to correct you.
Click to expand...

What was incorrect?

This was my quote...

“It’s not as if they were short 5 guys and we were full strength”

I’ll wait...
 
#138
#138
Kentucky doesn’t get to use the injury excuse or the youth excuse.

You’re Kentucky and have all the talent in the world. Youth is the path you’ve chosen.
 
#139
#139
1200DPI said:
Losing to UT/Barnes in Knoxville is no biggie for Cal. He's doing his friend a favor by helping him keep his job.

UT is no threat to Cal and KY so it's a harmless gesture by Cal.

Cal will make sure that UT doesn't win in Lexington. That would be taking their friendship a bit too far.

Wouldn't doubt Cal referring some second tier players to Barnes and UT.

Bottom Line -- UT and Barnes aren't significant opponents for Cal and UK. They live in different strata of college basketball.

They may have gotten together before the game and plotted their double technical extravaganza similar to what one often sees at wrestling events.
Click to expand...

Worst. Take. Ever.
 
#141
#141
bleedingTNorange said:
What was incorrect?

This was my quote...

“It’s not as if they were short 5 guys and we were full strength”

I’ll wait...
Click to expand...

You're not getting me in an argument where you spend a page and a half arguing semantics and the small details. UK were short quite a few players, UT was probably too, simple as that.
 
#142
#142
LittleCat said:
You're not getting me in an argument where you spend a page and a half arguing semantics and the small details. UK were short quite a few players, UT was probably too, simple as that.
Click to expand...

Still wondering what part of that quote was incorrect?

Both teams were down players, UK played more guys double digit minutes than UT...like my original quote, not as if Kentucky was without 5 guys and Tennessee was full strength.
 
#143
#143
1200DPI said:
Losing to UT/Barnes in Knoxville is no biggie for Cal. He's doing his friend a favor by helping him keep his job.

UT is no threat to Cal and KY so it's a harmless gesture by Cal.

Cal will make sure that UT doesn't win in Lexington. That would be taking their friendship a bit too far.

Wouldn't doubt Cal referring some second tier players to Barnes and UT.

Bottom Line -- UT and Barnes aren't significant opponents for Cal and UK. They live in different strata of college basketball.

They may have gotten together before the game and plotted their double technical extravaganza similar to what one often sees at wrestling events.
Click to expand...

This may be the dumbest thing I've ever seen on any messageboard.
 
#144
#144
Great win. Listened to Bob & Bert via the Tune In App while watching it. That was fun. I need to flip through this thread. That will probably cheer me up a little if tonight’s game doesn’t get fixed when the offense moves towards Barnes in the second half.

KY game makes it hard to criticize the 3* plan, but tonight may reignite the recruiting argument.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top