Britton Colquitt should be kicked off ...He doesn't make that much of a change

#1

tnballer71

New Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2008
Messages
2
Likes
0
#1
If they think by him returning, it will change things...thats stupid...they could make alot more changes for the better!!!!
 
#2
#2
He'll just be able to kick it even further, making it difficult for our sucky kick coverage to tackle the return man.
 
#4
#4
He isn't better? Punting the ball 50 yds instead of 30? No bad punts/blocked punts yet? I just fail to see the reasoning behind this.
 
#5
#5
i think VN could make a change w/ banning the original poster of this thread, but then again it wouldn't make much of a diff.
 
#6
#6
i think VN could make a change w/ banning the original poster of this thread, but then again it wouldn't make much of a diff.

still a big fan of the minimum post count to start a new thread. Heck you have to post at least once to play in the arcade
 
#12
#12
I am not hating.. Just saying Colquitt is a better player :)

I agree, Colquitt will certainly have better punts than Cunningham had. However, like I mentioned earlier, what do you think the over/under is for "Number of punt returns for TD because Colquitt outkicks the coverage" is for the rest of the season? 2? 3? Oh well, as long as he doesn't unilaterally decide to change a called punt to a fake punt 20 yards from the opposing endzone.
 
#13
#13
He isn't better? Punting the ball 50 yds instead of 30? No bad punts/blocked punts yet? I just fail to see the reasoning behind this.


Lets see, 50 yd punt minus 15 yard PF = 35 yard punt, Hum, not much difference other than whats in the cooler at the end of the game!:)
 
#14
#14
I say hush and have a drink on Britton.
jack_daniels.jpg
 
#18
#18
If they think by him returning, it will change things...thats stupid...they could make alot more changes for the better!!!!

Dude, did you sleep through last week, this will be his second game back.....barn door...there goes the horse
 
#23
#23
Whether or not he should have been allowed back on the team has nothing to do with the quality punter he is. (Well, not in the context the op believes, anyway)
 
Advertisement



Back
Top