madtownvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 18, 2014
- Messages
- 7,206
- Likes
- 31,117
Right, the other poster's "100% reason" was an overstatement. But, I was responding to a more general point that a lack of NIL funds impeded Kellie's success at HS recruiting. I am pretty sure you know that.It is total nonsense to say that Kellie’s failures as a head coach were completely based on her NIL funding or lack thereof, as the previous poster stated.
The primary reason that her NIL funding was not as high as she wanted, and would have fallen off even further if she had been retained, is that the many of the people they were asking to spend the money on players were no longer confident in her abilities to coach a talented roster, based on the results they saw her last two seasons.
"You can provide the reason that there was less NIL funding than some other schools, and that is situationally accurate, but not having a backup plan or other high-level recruits ready to take those spots and that money is malpractice, and that’s exactly how it was viewed by the Tennessee administration."
Okay, what does this statement mean exactly? Kellie was getting out bid for top HS players and what was her back-up plan supposed to be? The main plan B in those situations is the portal, is it not? And that is what she used to fill gaps. Your alternative scenario in which Kellie should have had other high level recruits "waiting" to take those unfilled spots does not seem feasible in a world where everybody is on the recruiting market.
Okay high level recruit, I want you on stand by (so, don't take your other scholarship/NIL offers) in case these specific HS stars I am pursuing commit to another school. Be on alert for my text messages, cause you are my back-up plan!"
Last edited:
