Anything that gets us closer to being a for real dominant type team is good. I think that's what has many not as happy about the Carolina game as they might be. We all wanna be on a par w Bama...and be a real threat to them.
If that's your perspective, Johnny, then you should be cautiously happy with the victory over South Carolina. It may, just may, be an indicator that we're on exactly the right track to "be on par w Bama" one day, as you wish.
Let me explain:
In Nick Saban's first year in Tuscaoosa, he lost to Auburn, Mississippi State, LSU, Florida State, Georgia, and ... Louisiana-Monroe. No dynasty yet, for sure.
His second season, he only beat Tulane by 20-6. Not a hugely dominating performance against a team that should've been a scrimmage. That same season, he only beat Kentucky 17-14. And was 24-20 over Ole Miss.
In his third year, Nick barely beat our now Fulmer-less Vols, 12-10. And squeaked by Auburn, 26-21. Still building.
His fourth season, Saban beat Arkansas 24-20. He lost to USCe, 35-21. Lost. He also lost to LSU and Auburn that year.
It wasn't until Nick's fifth season as head elephant that his team began dominantly beating everyone on their schedule.
Point is, dynasties take time to develop. To mature. It's the old play-recruit-play cycle. You play a good season, and attract better new players. With them, you play a better season, and then attract even better recruits. And so on. Until eventually, you ratchet yourself up to dominance.
But it doesn't come all at once.
So at first, you just focus on one thing: win every game you can. Just win. Win ugly, win pretty, win big, win barely, just win.
And let the dominating seasons happen when they will.
Go Vols!