we like tymond howard a lot and we lead for him BUT taking him would not affect adams because adams plays the pg/sg role(most likely a point guard).
I agree. The more likely reason for not taking Adams is that even though Chris Jones is going to be very, very good, he is not likely to be a one and done or a two and through. Thus, we have two PGs in Jones and Golden for a few years from 2011 to 2013.
Where we will need to replace is at SF and SG, where Harris, Tatum, Maymon and Hopson will go starting with Hopson after 2010-11, Harris and Tatum after 2011-12 and Maymon after 2012-13 (unless Maymon just blows upand leaves earlier than that).
I'd say our coaches are pretty confident about getting Parker as well. They just need to bridge the 2nd Center spot alongside Hall between Williams leaving and Parker arriving. That may be Michael Chandler (as a one and done or two and through) or the 7'1 Juco Center (as a one and done or two and through).
That's a long-winded way of saying that Howard isn't preferred over Adams because Howard is probably a future SF and Adams a Combo Guard. I tend to think (assuming our coaches have as high an opinion of Adams as does ESPN) that we simply learned our lesson about taking commitments from rising Juniors (call it the "Selby Rule"). Remember the staff was also reluctant to "take" Chris Jones' commitment when he first wanted to go public with it.
If we take Adams now, we get 8-10 schools in his ear saying "Tennessee?" If we wait, those 8-10 schools are having to promote themselves over the other 8-10 instead of focusing just on bashing the Vols.