So you agree that the criminals will still acquire everything that you are wanting to ban (bad children) and that the law abiding citizens will be the only ones to follow the laws (good children). So you are all about punishing those who follow the law so you can feel safer?
It is exactly what you advocate.I do not agree with this statement at all.
You are really something. You have no idea that even if there is a 'loophole', said 'loophole' must therefore without a doubt be bad and needs closing. 'Loophole' has a negative connotation, therefore if one exists, which youI don't know the answer. Supposedly there is one. If there is, close it. If there's not, you guys have nothing to worry about on that particular issue. easy peasy
IT was called March for Our Lives?Turns out the 800k figure that was given to the media by organizers of the march was just a wee bit off, by like 600k.
From CBS News:
More than 200,000 people attended the March for Our Lives demonstration in Washington D.C. on Saturday, according to Digital Design & Imaging Service Inc (DDIS). The Virginia-based firm uses a proprietary method for calculating crowd size using aerial photos.
The peak crowd size was 202,796 people, with a margin of error of 15 percent, the firm said. The crowd reached its largest size at 1 p.m., according to the companys estimates.
So sorry TnRibs, looks like more people, by a lot, turned out for Trumps inauguration. Hopefully this ruins your day.
So Delta donated three round trip charter flights for protestors.
But they have a neutral stance.
How is ending the NRA discount and offering free flights to the anti gun protestors neutral?
I would love to see someone from Young Republicans or March for Life tweet them about donating flights for upcoming events.
1. "A march for their lies" ?
2. "No one would know your names"
3. Had a hero like Blaine been there your classmates would still be alive. Complete and total lie.
4. The media would then have completely and utterly ignored your story the way they ignored his. 100% total BS lie. I have seen numerous stories on Gaskill and his quick actions. Plus the two shootings were in no way similar. In the latter, the guy was specifically targeting his ex-girlfriend.
The whole statement is intentionally misleading and biased. I rate it as TOTAL BS.
But there is still gun violence in the UK. Btw, way to cherry pick. Lets talk about France who has even stricter gun laws and a larger problem with gun violence. Why isnt gun control working there?
Why didnt the murder rate fall off after the UK banned certain classes if firearms? Why did knife attacks increase? Why wont you admit that government bans dont work? Why are you being intellectually dishonest with everyone in this board?
Nope. Look at every great social change throughout history. Almost always headed, or at least supported, by the youth. Youth didn't grow out of their anti-slavery phase. Youth didn't grow out of their women's right to vote phase. Youth didn't grow out of their gay acceptance phase. Youth didn't grow out of their integration phase.
