NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 59,495
- Likes
- 86,857
That's making the false assumption that all repubs. will remain in lockstep with the NRA. They aren't. that's going to be the biggest change. What do you think the repub. senators will do when they become convinced that a hard line pro gun stance actually hurts. their chance of being reelected?
That's so insanely stupid. You tell me, what's the problem with having representatives from both sides of the debate coming to a compromise on the legally allowed rounds per second that a gun can fire. That gets over the ridiculous hurdle you guys keep bringing up about defining an assault weapon. Magazine capacity would also be on the table.
Sorry to hear that Hog. That has to be devastating. Must have been really hard to move forward after that. I can't really imagine.No you blithering idiot. I do not want to lose a loved one but if I did i wouldnt call for any type of ban.
I lost a fiancé to a drunk driver but Im against all drunk driving laws. There should only be a law against drunk crashing.
On Facebook Saturday morning, the NRA posted a short membership-drive video along with a brief message.
"Stand and Fight for our Kids' Safety by Joining NRA," it said. "Today's protests aren't spontaneous. Gun-hating billionaires and Hollywood elites are manipulating and exploiting children as part of their plan to DESTROY the Second Amendment and strip us of our right to defend ourselves and our loved ones."
This is what the NRA had to say.....you be the judge.
