#BoycottNRA

Let me get this straight, when kids are murdered at school it's always "guns don't kill people, people kill people" but it's now the guns that gave us our freedom and not the people who fought. That some serious spin and extremely hypocritical.

No it’s the people that gave us our freedom armed with guns and thus we won’t give them up. That was a pretty lousy formed statement on your part.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Let me get this straight, when kids are murdered at school it's always "guns don't kill people, people kill people" but it's now the guns that gave us our freedom and not the people who fought. That some serious spin and extremely hypocritical.

Excellent point. Gun's don't kill people, but guns protect people. That is some serious spin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I thought you said "cool" story. Politicians vote the way their constituents wish. As those wishes change, so do the politicians, and wishes, they are a-changing, bro.

Now that's a cool story.

The funniest thing is you actually think any of this, including new laws, will help. People intent on killing will kill, kinda like the bomber in Austin Texas...
 
Again, anybody, this is the exact same play that resulted in FAWB1994 that was allowed to expire and not renew. Why is that?
 
If it were just one, and that one was your child or grandchild.. worth it?

Why aren't you as adamantly against tobacco. Infinitely easier to save exponentially more lives every year. That's not a political issue for liberals is it? Not a right that you can readily idetify to steal?

The real answer is that you people foolishly believe that massive limitations on the 2A will protect you. Go to some of these countries that you brag about. You won't do as well. You limit the 2A, the 1A is next and then where will all you mouthpieces be?
 
I thought you said "cool" story. Politicians vote the way their constituents wish. As those wishes change, so do the politicians, and wishes, they are a-changing, bro.

Now that's a cool story.

You really think politicians vote the way their constituents wish?

If a politician's vote matches the beliefs of his/her constituents, I promise you it was a mere coincidence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I thought you said "cool" story. Politicians vote the way their constituents wish. As those wishes change, so do the politicians, and wishes, they are a-changing, bro.

Now that's a cool story.

We hear that all the time. But then when elections happen its like there are a whole lot of people who never say a word that show up and vote just the opposite of this scenario.

Weird stuff man...
 
Again, anybody, this is the exact same play that resulted in FAWB1994 that was allowed to expire and not renew. Why is that?

Having now asked three times with no response, you may need to go ahead and answer your own question. Sometimes people just will not play along. When that happens to me, it's almost always when I have an excellent point to make.
 
Let me get this straight, when kids are murdered at school it's always "guns don't kill people, people kill people" but it's now the guns that gave us our freedom and not the people who fought. That some serious spin and extremely hypocritical.
A gun is merely a tool..............................just like you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Wait.. WTF? You'd rather lose a loved one than lose your right to have an AR15? I'm wasting my time here.

No you blithering idiot. I do not want to lose a loved one but if I did i wouldn’t call for any type of ban.

I lost a fiancé to a drunk driver but I’m against all drunk driving laws. There should only be a law against drunk crashing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
FAWB1994 expired because it was piss poor legislation. Even WaPo thinks so. And they at least had the stones to admit it would take an outright ownership ban to be effective.

Dims don’t want to solve this just like they don’t want to solve DACA. It’s way more valuable as a campaigning tool to fix. There was no interest in Congress in 2004 to renew it. Not even when Barry had Congress support.

If they wanted to reinstate FAWB1994 it would have happened early on Barry’s watch. But they want ALL the guns.

Everything you need to know about the assault weapons ban, in one post - The Washington Post

In addition to the academic in this article refer to the work of James Alan Fox. One of his graphs is below. There was no noticeable positive impact from FAWB1994

As the next mass shooting looms: James Alan Fox

Despite their unparalleled firepower, most mass murderers actually do not use assault rifles, but instead rely on more easily transported and concealed semi-automatic handguns. The assailant at Virginia Tech, for example, was able to execute 32 students and faculty with a pair of semi-automatic pistols. Although high capacity magazines allow for dozens of shots without reloading, the same can be accomplished with multiple weapons.

The left doesn’t want gun control to fix school shootings. They want it for disarmament. If they wanted to fix school shootings they would address hardening schools. By using emotional issues like school shootings they go after what they want, all your guns. Just like they don’t want to really fix DACA. Stringing immigrants along insures they keep their votes.
 

Attachments

  • 88521B67-3EA6-4F0B-BCC4-B961AA53A059.jpg
    88521B67-3EA6-4F0B-BCC4-B961AA53A059.jpg
    45.8 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Those three points are rational and reasonable. I believe all 3 of those will be accomplished in the next year or so.

You will get all of the usual responses, but brighter minds will prevail. It's unfortunate that we couldn't lead and could only react to the voices of youth.

The youth of America are just shaking their heads in disgust and disbelief at what we have allowed.

And I shake my head at those like you that come across so concerned about the children but believe Roe vs Wade was the best thing since sliced bread. Go figure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The liberals are clinging at any straw. The liberal media is covering this like they are hoping they've found their next generation of liberals that will be the end of conservatism forever.

I agree we need stronger gun laws but liberals aren't even united on the message. Do individuals need high powered weapons? I would say no. Do they want stronger gun laws or do they want to take guns from people? They don't know or is it because their speakers are barely in their teens.

They ignore family values, personal responsibility and mental health issues. They also ignore that the bad guy doesn't care about laws.

The issues in this country has many layers and if they are not all laid out as issues it only looks to create a bandaid solution. I can tell you the average American is sick of the holier than thou celebrity coming on television and trying to tell everybody else what they need to do while they live like heathen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The liberals are clinging at any straw. The liberal media is covering this like they are hoping they've found their next generation of liberals that will be the end of conservatism forever.

I agree we need stronger gun laws but liberals aren't even united on the message. Do individuals need high powered weapons? I would say no. Do they want stronger gun laws or do they want to take guns from people? They don't know or is it because their speakers are barely in their teens.

They ignore family values, personal responsibility and mental health issues. They also ignore that the bad guy doesn't care about laws.

The issues in this country has many layers and if they are not all laid out as issues it only looks to create a bandaid solution. I can tell you the average American is sick of the holier than thou celebrity coming on television and trying to tell everybody else what they need to do while they live like heathen.

We don't need stronger gun laws, we need better background checks.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top